County Board of Supervisors
Transcript
| Well. | 00:00:00 | |
| Department directors. | 00:00:01 | |
| Who joined us tonight? | 00:00:02 | |
| I want to and also representatives from Ellers and associates that will be talking with us in a few minutes about. | 00:00:04 | |
| Financing. | 00:00:11 | |
| And the financing opportunities? | 00:00:12 | |
| For Dodge County and what the impact would be. | 00:00:14 | |
| If we were to pursue such a thing in the future, but before we go the go to their presentation, I wanted to give a brief overview | 00:00:16 | |
| of some of the material that was distributed. | 00:00:22 | |
| Via e-mail to your emails on Saturday morning. | 00:00:27 | |
| So first and foremost, just to confirm with everyone, we. | 00:00:32 | |
| We have a before you and what you received last week is a balanced budget. | 00:00:35 | |
| We have about $71.9 million in overall budget for general fund. | 00:00:40 | |
| Fund 100. | 00:00:46 | |
| And then all funds you'll notice down a little further down below 183,000,000. | 00:00:48 | |
| $782,824. | 00:00:53 | |
| The adjusted number there is meant to show operational costs when we take out. | 00:00:57 | |
| Transfers between funds because that inflates the number and when we take out internal service. | 00:01:01 | |
| Costs. | 00:01:07 | |
| Because that also inflates, inflates the net. | 00:01:07 | |
| Amount. | 00:01:10 | |
| And then overall property tax? | 00:01:12 | |
| At UH. | 00:01:14 | |
| 37.1. | 00:01:15 | |
| Million. | 00:01:16 | |
| For 2026. | 00:01:18 | |
| I have some. | 00:01:21 | |
| Some information that is interesting that I would love to work have more interactive a discussion on, but we'll do that near the. | 00:01:22 | |
| Latter end of the meeting. | 00:01:29 | |
| But comparison for Dodge County versus the other 71 counties in the state of. | 00:01:30 | |
| Wisconsin. | 00:01:36 | |
| So this is just we, we talked about this previously, but a reminder there, we have two lines. | 00:01:37 | |
| Demonstrating for US operating and capital expenses specifically. | 00:01:42 | |
| The blue one. | 00:01:47 | |
| Is actual. | 00:01:48 | |
| In actual dollars and the orange is when we take. | 00:01:49 | |
| This year's dollars. | 00:01:53 | |
| 2025. | 00:01:54 | |
| And review or. | 00:01:55 | |
| 25 and 26, but go backward. | 00:01:57 | |
| And look at OK. | 00:01:59 | |
| Purchasing power of dollars today. | 00:02:01 | |
| And equivalent value today. | 00:02:03 | |
| In 2012. | 00:02:06 | |
| 2017 What would that look like? | 00:02:07 | |
| And when you do that? | 00:02:09 | |
| You can see that the. | 00:02:11 | |
| The increase is much less dramatic than it might sound when we look at. | 00:02:12 | |
| Dollar for dollar actuals. | 00:02:19 | |
| In in 2025 looking back. | 00:02:20 | |
| Like we have with the blue line. | 00:02:24 | |
| If that makes sense. | 00:02:26 | |
| Property tax over time. | 00:02:28 | |
| In the same form, so taking the number this year and then projecting that backward to look at what our costs were like over the | 00:02:30 | |
| last 10 years. | 00:02:34 | |
| Excuse me? | 00:02:38 | |
| We have actually reduced overtime. | 00:02:39 | |
| What we are spending out of our. | 00:02:43 | |
| Residents pockets are businesses coffers. | 00:02:47 | |
| On property taxes or on property tax funded services in Dodge County. | 00:02:50 | |
| That has gone down. | 00:02:55 | |
| So. | 00:02:56 | |
| I'll show. | 00:02:57 | |
| Some more direct. | 00:02:58 | |
| Detail those numbers. | 00:03:00 | |
| In a coming slide. | 00:03:02 | |
| But then we also look at median homeowner property tax. Now the slides you received on Saturday, there was a bit of a. | 00:03:04 | |
| An error or something that would be confusing, it said. I think median homeowner $300,000. | 00:03:11 | |
| Property tax. | 00:03:17 | |
| So a median home of 300,000 but we've. | 00:03:19 | |
| Assessed or taken a look at the median home. | 00:03:21 | |
| Across time. | 00:03:24 | |
| But you can see there too the median homeowner. | 00:03:26 | |
| Overtime has been paying. | 00:03:29 | |
| Less. | 00:03:30 | |
| Per $1000 or overall? Excuse me? | 00:03:31 | |
| Property tax dollars. | 00:03:34 | |
| When we look at revenues historically. | 00:03:37 | |
| Dodge County. | 00:03:40 | |
| Has. | 00:03:41 | |
| Really. You'll see there. | 00:03:42 | |
| Four major revenues, the blue line or the blue? | 00:03:44 | |
| Chunk of the bar is our property taxes. | 00:03:47 | |
| The yellow chunk of the bar sales tax. | 00:03:50 | |
| Light green is charges for service and. | 00:03:53 | |
| Dark green is. | 00:03:55 | |
| You'll notice that the blue line or the blue bar. | 00:03:57 | |
| Doesn't change much. | 00:04:00 | |
| Over time. | 00:04:02 | |
| And that's because as we look at what we're charging. | 00:04:03 | |
| In property tax. | 00:04:07 | |
| It's remained fairly consistent. | 00:04:09 | |
| It has gone up. What you don't have here is an adjusted version, but I've looked at that and that. | 00:04:11 | |
| Shows that. | 00:04:18 | |
| That amount even more closely aligning or even. | 00:04:19 | |
| As we mentioned in the other slides going down but the. | 00:04:22 | |
| You'll see sales tax as well has increased slightly. | 00:04:25 | |
| But the significant change? | 00:04:28 | |
| Overtime has been charges for service. | 00:04:30 | |
| So as we have grown as an organization or as we've maybe not even grown as an organization, probably better to say as we have. | 00:04:33 | |
| Every year, year by year. | 00:04:41 | |
| We go through this process and we look to reduce or keep the same or as. | 00:04:43 | |
| As reined in as possible our property taxes. | 00:04:49 | |
| We've looked to other. | 00:04:52 | |
| Other things for covering. | 00:04:53 | |
| Covering costs and that's charges for service now in there of course is also Clearview. | 00:04:56 | |
| Which funds its whole operation through its charges for service. But other things have increased as well in terms of charges for | 00:05:01 | |
| service. That's how that's the big. | 00:05:06 | |
| Significant change. | 00:05:11 | |
| That has helped us. | 00:05:12 | |
| To survive and navigate. | 00:05:14 | |
| With a fairly consistent property tax amount. | 00:05:16 | |
| Overtime. | 00:05:19 | |
| Also, you'll see grants have gone up, but not significantly. In fact, they've dropped a little bit in the last. | 00:05:20 | |
| Well, for 2026 we project. | 00:05:26 | |
| What's important here to note is. | 00:05:29 | |
| If we thought about. | 00:05:31 | |
| Cutting a service. | 00:05:33 | |
| See where the revenues are for services. | 00:05:36 | |
| And how much of a percent of our budget they are. | 00:05:38 | |
| It would be. | 00:05:41 | |
| Ill advised. | 00:05:42 | |
| To look at ways to reduce a service. | 00:05:43 | |
| For our residents. | 00:05:46 | |
| Because that's that's a significant percentage of our overall bucket. | 00:05:48 | |
| And I'll share that in another image here in a second. Here's the adjusted of that same. | 00:05:52 | |
| That same bar chart. | 00:05:55 | |
| But now it's. | 00:05:58 | |
| Disregard the the text that's a little bit off, but the table itself. | 00:05:59 | |
| You can see that change. So when we factor in the consumer price index changes over the last 10 years. | 00:06:03 | |
| We've actually reduced our property tax by 5.7, almost 5.8. | 00:06:10 | |
| $1,000,000. | 00:06:14 | |
| In terms of the actual value. | 00:06:15 | |
| Of what we're paying in tax and what that can do in terms of funding services. | 00:06:18 | |
| So this is. | 00:06:25 | |
| What I was thinking of where I'd show it a little bit better, this is just looking at the percentage change. | 00:06:27 | |
| Or excuse me, not the percentage, change the percent of. | 00:06:32 | |
| The revenue, the. | 00:06:36 | |
| Whole bucket of revenues. | 00:06:37 | |
| Each year for these four major revenues, and again blue is property tax, yellow as sales taxed, green is charges for service. | 00:06:38 | |
| Dark green is grants. | 00:06:44 | |
| And you'll see that. | 00:06:46 | |
| Overtime looking even now to 2026. | 00:06:47 | |
| Property tax. | 00:06:51 | |
| Is. | 00:06:52 | |
| 22.5%. | 00:06:53 | |
| Of the overall. | 00:06:55 | |
| Portion or that's the piece of the pie, 22.5% of all of our revenues are comprised by property tax, nearly 50%. | 00:06:57 | |
| Comprised of. | 00:07:05 | |
| Service charges. | 00:07:07 | |
| 6.2%. | 00:07:08 | |
| Being then the sales tax in the 14.1% are grants, which is noted as I mentioned down from the last few years. | 00:07:09 | |
| Things have been reduced. That's not a change in. | 00:07:17 | |
| What we? | 00:07:20 | |
| What we've been doing just a change in what dollars are available for us. A significant contributor to that higher, higher line in | 00:07:21 | |
| and increase from 2021 to 2023 is ARPA dollars as well. | 00:07:27 | |
| So with that. | 00:07:33 | |
| Factored out, it's probably a much more. | 00:07:35 | |
| Consistent or. | 00:07:38 | |
| Flatline. | 00:07:39 | |
| So I like this slide and it was the concept was provided to me. | 00:07:42 | |
| Many, many months ago by our finance director. So I wanted to, Mr. Chair, if it's all right, light up his microphone. | 00:07:48 | |
| And allow. | 00:07:54 | |
| Mr. Tilda Share. | 00:07:56 | |
| Kind of the the point of this slide. | 00:07:58 | |
| OK. | 00:08:15 | |
| Nope. | 00:08:16 | |
| How about tapping it now? | 00:08:18 | |
| Nope. Maybe. Maybe you can just. | 00:08:20 | |
| Yeah, I was gonna say, maybe you could just do that. | 00:08:26 | |
| Nope, it's Bill. | 00:08:30 | |
| Oh, there we go. | 00:08:32 | |
| They're not swung the right way. | 00:08:33 | |
| That's OK, you still got some steps in. | 00:08:35 | |
| Back and back again. | 00:08:38 | |
| So this slide basically. | 00:08:40 | |
| Represents philosophies or approaches to budgeting. Obviously no one will like the. | 00:08:43 | |
| Below budget, right where? | 00:08:49 | |
| If you were to. | 00:08:52 | |
| Think of your revenues versus expenses. You're spending more than you. | 00:08:53 | |
| Then you bring in. | 00:08:58 | |
| Right where you're underwater. | 00:08:59 | |
| Oftentimes in government we talk about a balanced budget. | 00:09:02 | |
| And oftentimes if we just match expenses to revenues? | 00:09:05 | |
| We're treading water. | 00:09:11 | |
| We're really not planning for the future. | 00:09:12 | |
| So oftentimes in. | 00:09:18 | |
| Good governance. | 00:09:21 | |
| You'll see. | 00:09:22 | |
| Departments and so forth basically. | 00:09:24 | |
| Over. | 00:09:28 | |
| Overestimating expenses under estimating revenues. | 00:09:29 | |
| Gives a bit of a cushion. | 00:09:33 | |
| And allows us to. | 00:09:36 | |
| Bring in fund balance and so it's just above budget. | 00:09:38 | |
| But where? | 00:09:43 | |
| The obvious. | 00:09:45 | |
| Thing here that we're just staying afloat in that example. | 00:09:46 | |
| But the obvious thing that we're really trying to do. | 00:09:49 | |
| Is we're trying to. | 00:09:52 | |
| Get up on our skis. | 00:09:53 | |
| And we're really trying to make sure that we're we're planning for the future. | 00:09:55 | |
| And so oftentimes, it won't just be your operational expenses. | 00:09:59 | |
| Balanced against your operational revenues, but you'll. | 00:10:04 | |
| Be trying to. | 00:10:08 | |
| Basically. | 00:10:10 | |
| Plan for the future you're trying to. | 00:10:13 | |
| To to get up on the skis. | 00:10:15 | |
| What I like about this image? | 00:10:18 | |
| Is. | 00:10:20 | |
| To think about. | 00:10:22 | |
| Who's driving the boat? | 00:10:23 | |
| And whose? | 00:10:25 | |
| The water skier. | 00:10:26 | |
| And. | 00:10:28 | |
| Generally speaking as staff. | 00:10:29 | |
| Were were were the ones? | 00:10:31 | |
| Trying to perform were the skiers. | 00:10:34 | |
| As a board and as government. | 00:10:37 | |
| You have the opportunity to. | 00:10:40 | |
| To drive the policies. | 00:10:42 | |
| That that help us to. | 00:10:45 | |
| To move forward or not? | 00:10:47 | |
| And so. | 00:10:49 | |
| That. | 00:10:50 | |
| That's what I like about this image. | 00:10:51 | |
| It was shared with me at one point in time and so I've. | 00:10:53 | |
| I've used it. | 00:10:57 | |
| And so anyways, does that cover what you want in Cameron? | 00:10:58 | |
| It does. Thank you. | 00:11:02 | |
| So and. | 00:11:03 | |
| Enjoy the picture because I'm probably going to share it every year. | 00:11:05 | |
| To a degree and I would say. | 00:11:09 | |
| With what I want to share next. | 00:11:10 | |
| Before we even get to the next slide. | 00:11:13 | |
| We are really in a lot of ways right now. | 00:11:16 | |
| As your administrator, I would share with you. | 00:11:19 | |
| We have been balanced and as costs increased to go up. | 00:11:22 | |
| We are. | 00:11:27 | |
| We're utilizing the. | 00:11:28 | |
| The resources that are there in the in the third stick figure. | 00:11:31 | |
| With a life jacket floating just above the water. | 00:11:34 | |
| You're above budget with fund reserves. | 00:11:37 | |
| So for years we've whittled down fund reserves. | 00:11:40 | |
| For various things. | 00:11:44 | |
| But we've. | 00:11:46 | |
| Been very conservative in our estimates, so we. | 00:11:48 | |
| At the end of the year, even though we plan for and whittle down those fund reserves for operations or expect to when we budget. | 00:11:51 | |
| We've we've been all right. | 00:11:58 | |
| But as costs increase. | 00:12:00 | |
| We have to. | 00:12:02 | |
| Not only review and and. | 00:12:03 | |
| Remove or eliminate certain things, but we also have to be a little more. | 00:12:05 | |
| Aggressive with some of our cost estimates, so. | 00:12:10 | |
| We're not necessarily eroding fund balance. | 00:12:14 | |
| There's some things we'll talk about with fund balance in a little bit, but we are. | 00:12:18 | |
| This year's budget in order to balance. | 00:12:22 | |
| We're looking at. | 00:12:24 | |
| The last three years of. | 00:12:26 | |
| Revenues and expenses when we make our projections. | 00:12:28 | |
| But we're. | 00:12:32 | |
| We're upping that a little bit from where our typical conservative numbers would be just because. | 00:12:33 | |
| We know that. | 00:12:39 | |
| With our. | 00:12:40 | |
| Conservative estimates and operations we've had in the past, it wouldn't work. | 00:12:41 | |
| So. | 00:12:44 | |
| Let me just share with you. | 00:12:46 | |
| In case you. | 00:12:47 | |
| You may recall from our discussion on. | 00:12:48 | |
| Or the e-mail. Excuse me on Saturday. | 00:12:51 | |
| But one of the sections is called Balancing the Budget and Closing Funding gap. | 00:12:54 | |
| So in this section of the very. | 00:12:58 | |
| Lengthy e-mail. | 00:13:01 | |
| Thank you to all those that read it. | 00:13:02 | |
| In that section, we're talking about in a bulleted list. | 00:13:05 | |
| The revenues that we've estimated higher than we typically do. | 00:13:09 | |
| Still within the realm of something that is possible and. | 00:13:12 | |
| I think pretty safe to expect. | 00:13:16 | |
| But much more than. | 00:13:19 | |
| We've relied on those. | 00:13:21 | |
| On those projected revenues, much more than we have in the past. | 00:13:23 | |
| In order to make things work. | 00:13:26 | |
| With the budget that is before you and this. | 00:13:28 | |
| Excludes the. | 00:13:30 | |
| The capital improvement plan items that we're going to. | 00:13:32 | |
| Talk about tonight as well. | 00:13:35 | |
| So one example of that is federal corrections revenue. | 00:13:37 | |
| We've increased the. | 00:13:41 | |
| The anticipated revenue. | 00:13:42 | |
| In the budget by $212,000. | 00:13:44 | |
| We expect to get that. | 00:13:48 | |
| But we're leaving. We're sticking our neck out a little bit farther. | 00:13:49 | |
| To make that work right. | 00:13:53 | |
| We've estimated an increase of $500,000. | 00:13:54 | |
| In the WIMCR Wisconsin. | 00:13:58 | |
| MCR revenue this winter payment. | 00:14:01 | |
| That fits within the trend. | 00:14:04 | |
| But it is again. | 00:14:06 | |
| We're we're not saying. | 00:14:08 | |
| A real low number anymore where? | 00:14:10 | |
| We're estimating. | 00:14:12 | |
| With what we think will be the actual number, but if it's lower. | 00:14:13 | |
| We've put ourselves out a little bit. | 00:14:16 | |
| With some risk. | 00:14:18 | |
| There's also a rolling surplus that we will be applying, so the fund balance in Fund 200 for Human Services and health. | 00:14:21 | |
| From now on, we'll make sure we maintain a minimum balance in that fund. | 00:14:27 | |
| If possible. | 00:14:31 | |
| We won't take money from that fund for any. | 00:14:33 | |
| For any purpose and put toward operations. | 00:14:35 | |
| Any if they're below that minimum balance. | 00:14:38 | |
| So if they have less than that, we'll keep. | 00:14:41 | |
| Going and trying to fill it with reimbursements that we get from the state, but once they reach that minimum balance, we're | 00:14:43 | |
| skimming everything off the top and applying that to their operations to reduce the amount of property tax that we have to | 00:14:48 | |
| allocate to Human Services and health. | 00:14:52 | |
| So again. | 00:14:57 | |
| Ultimately to take away their. | 00:14:59 | |
| We are sticking our neck out a little farther. | 00:15:01 | |
| When it comes to what we're willing to risk or what we're willing to to anticipate for revenues. | 00:15:03 | |
| Which? | 00:15:10 | |
| Again, I don't. | 00:15:10 | |
| Believer said. I don't believe we're setting up. | 00:15:12 | |
| Ourselves up for failure with this budget but. | 00:15:14 | |
| This is a trend and a movement that we need to be aware of. | 00:15:16 | |
| Indirect cost contributions from. | 00:15:20 | |
| Clearview. | 00:15:22 | |
| So Clearview is a. | 00:15:23 | |
| Is a fee based. | 00:15:24 | |
| And. | 00:15:26 | |
| Fee based operation. | 00:15:27 | |
| People coming pay for it and those are the revenues that. | 00:15:29 | |
| Pay for the whole function. | 00:15:33 | |
| We are they had in the past. | 00:15:34 | |
| Allocated. | 00:15:37 | |
| Or written off. | 00:15:38 | |
| About $800,000 of in kind services. | 00:15:39 | |
| Basically in providing. | 00:15:42 | |
| Rooms for wards of the county. | 00:15:44 | |
| That are under the charge or responsibility of Human Services. | 00:15:47 | |
| And health, they've provided those rooms. | 00:15:50 | |
| Free of charge to Human Services and Health. | 00:15:53 | |
| We would no matter what have to find places for these individuals, probably there, but rather than have HSH pay. | 00:15:55 | |
| Clearview has taken that on this year instead of doing that allocation. | 00:16:02 | |
| We simply pulled a full amount of indirect costs for. | 00:16:08 | |
| Services. | 00:16:12 | |
| From our indirect cost reports we do every year. | 00:16:12 | |
| And ask Clearview to put in that full amount which is about 1.4 million. | 00:16:16 | |
| And what that does is. | 00:16:20 | |
| No longer will they do the in kind. | 00:16:22 | |
| Write off or. | 00:16:24 | |
| Provision of those spaces Human Services and health will we will book and document Human Services and health paying the. | 00:16:26 | |
| The rent for the space of the charges. | 00:16:33 | |
| But. | 00:16:36 | |
| Clear views paying directly to Dodge County. | 00:16:37 | |
| A greater amount that. | 00:16:40 | |
| Cancels out that 800,000 and adds an additional $602,000 into our revenue bucket. | 00:16:41 | |
| For operations for the rest of the county. | 00:16:47 | |
| In addition to those things I want to mention. | 00:16:53 | |
| And this is important because I want you to know where we are. | 00:16:57 | |
| Endeavoring to provide. | 00:17:00 | |
| Of value to dodge. | 00:17:03 | |
| For Dodge County residents. | 00:17:05 | |
| And be conservative in what we're providing. | 00:17:07 | |
| There were over $230,000 worth of new requests. | 00:17:09 | |
| And primarily operations related. | 00:17:14 | |
| That were. | 00:17:17 | |
| That were. | 00:17:18 | |
| Rejected. | 00:17:19 | |
| So. | 00:17:20 | |
| Things that departments came. | 00:17:21 | |
| Came forward asking for. | 00:17:23 | |
| Some things were. | 00:17:25 | |
| Were approved. | 00:17:26 | |
| Dollars were allocated a lot of. | 00:17:27 | |
| Capital or one time expenses, but operational things like new positions and for the most part. | 00:17:29 | |
| Those unless they could fund themselves because of a grant or a different service fee. | 00:17:36 | |
| Those those requests were denied. | 00:17:41 | |
| We look at highway. | 00:17:44 | |
| Highway operations and. | 00:17:46 | |
| Sheriff's Office operations, they did have some reductions. | 00:17:49 | |
| We did make some reductions in terms of dollars allocated. | 00:17:52 | |
| The. | 00:17:56 | |
| The highway amount is was based on salary projections, but we've. | 00:17:58 | |
| This time based actual cost on previous years. | 00:18:04 | |
| The sheriff's reduction. | 00:18:06 | |
| Is also related to. | 00:18:08 | |
| Cost, just cost increases in that in the. | 00:18:10 | |
| Sheriff's Office that have been. | 00:18:13 | |
| Addressed with policy changes that have allowed us to reduce. | 00:18:16 | |
| The cost or the anticipated cost for 2026 in the Sheriff's Office? | 00:18:19 | |
| And I will leave it at that right now. | 00:18:25 | |
| But that information is the e-mail that I sent you previously, and the clerk does have copies. | 00:18:27 | |
| That we will provide later on in the. | 00:18:33 | |
| In the meeting. | 00:18:36 | |
| So that you have a hard copy as well as. | 00:18:37 | |
| As well as the e-mail. | 00:18:40 | |
| So moving forward. | 00:18:41 | |
| We have a few options I. | 00:18:42 | |
| Back up a little bit, I'm jumping now to. | 00:18:45 | |
| Not just the budget document, Which? | 00:18:47 | |
| Hopefully you've got some questions. We'll talk about those in a minute. | 00:18:49 | |
| But jumping to capital improvement planning because that's the other piece of what we need to talk about. | 00:18:52 | |
| You'll recall we approved or you approved. | 00:18:57 | |
| A number of projects in the capital improvement plan, but we sat with about $21 million of projects that were. | 00:19:00 | |
| Unfunded or that where funding had been had not been identified. | 00:19:06 | |
| So. | 00:19:10 | |
| That's what we need to or we would like to talk about and dedicate some time to now. And so we have representatives from Ehlers | 00:19:11 | |
| and Associates. | 00:19:14 | |
| That will be joining me. | 00:19:18 | |
| Up front. | 00:19:20 | |
| And I would also ask maybe. | 00:19:22 | |
| Our finance director, if he's willing to come. | 00:19:23 | |
| Come up as well. | 00:19:25 | |
| But as they're getting ready to come up, four or, excuse me, five options. So one option number one we don't really want to do. | 00:19:27 | |
| But always we can do nothing and just cover our eyes, right and and. | 00:19:32 | |
| That will leave us without. | 00:19:38 | |
| Meet meeting our 22 miles of roads per year goal. | 00:19:40 | |
| We can. | 00:19:44 | |
| Apply all of our general fund, fund balance and possibly others. | 00:19:45 | |
| To cover these gaps. | 00:19:51 | |
| Again, not necessarily the wisest option if we want to be not only conservative, but. | 00:19:54 | |
| Plan for rainy days. | 00:20:00 | |
| We could. | 00:20:02 | |
| Endeavor to cut some services and reallocate dollars to capital projects. | 00:20:03 | |
| But I will go back for just a minute. | 00:20:07 | |
| To this slide. | 00:20:10 | |
| To point out that. | 00:20:11 | |
| Services comprise a significant portion of our budget. | 00:20:13 | |
| In terms of revenues? | 00:20:17 | |
| So. | 00:20:18 | |
| When we were taking away from the highest generating source. | 00:20:20 | |
| Of revenue for Dodge County if we address. | 00:20:24 | |
| Or try to cut services. | 00:20:27 | |
| We could initiate A referendum to increase tax base. I know that concerns about a referendum or referendums in the future have | 00:20:30 | |
| been discussed. | 00:20:33 | |
| In the last. | 00:20:36 | |
| Few months. | 00:20:38 | |
| So that's not an option that would really work for funding right now. We would have to wait until later in 2026 before we would | 00:20:40 | |
| know the outcome and begin to fund projects. | 00:20:45 | |
| So we probably would be looking at increased costs or? | 00:20:50 | |
| Again, deferring some of our capital plan items for another year. | 00:20:54 | |
| And then the last one. | 00:20:58 | |
| And the one that. | 00:20:59 | |
| I would like this body to strongly consider. | 00:21:02 | |
| Is issue bonds to generate dollars to fund long term capital improvements? | 00:21:04 | |
| Only the stuff. | 00:21:09 | |
| That's going to last. | 00:21:10 | |
| The next. | 00:21:12 | |
| 20 years. | 00:21:13 | |
| We don't want to. | 00:21:14 | |
| Borrow money. | 00:21:16 | |
| For uh. | 00:21:17 | |
| What we're doing on a daily basis, our operations, that's like going to Check Into Cash. | 00:21:19 | |
| And none of us want to go to Check Into Cash. | 00:21:24 | |
| For dollars. | 00:21:26 | |
| What we're talking about is investing in the infrastructure. | 00:21:27 | |
| That hopefully will be here in some cases long after we have moved on to. | 00:21:31 | |
| Whatever is our next stage of life, and maybe not even here on the county board or here working for Dodge County, but the | 00:21:36 | |
| individuals that are here. | 00:21:40 | |
| Would be using those things. | 00:21:44 | |
| And also paying for them. | 00:21:46 | |
| Rather than you and I saving up. | 00:21:48 | |
| To buy something. | 00:21:50 | |
| That we might not fully utilize. | 00:21:51 | |
| Anyway, umm. | 00:21:53 | |
| So with that. | 00:21:55 | |
| I'll turn time over to Greg Johnson and Phil Carson from ELLERS and also welcome up our Finance Director. | 00:21:58 | |
| Well, actually just Greg Johnson. Phil gets the oh, Phil is coming up good. | 00:22:04 | |
| Greg is the guy. | 00:22:08 | |
| I was going to say poor sucker, but I'm not going to say that, but Greg is the guy that's going to be most doing most of the | 00:22:11 | |
| presentation. | 00:22:13 | |
| But we'll all just. | 00:22:18 | |
| Standing here and crowd around a bit. | 00:22:19 | |
| And as you have questions. | 00:22:22 | |
| We'll take them. | 00:22:25 | |
| Let me. | 00:22:26 | |
| Sorry, Greg, there you are. | 00:22:29 | |
| Take. Take it away. | 00:22:31 | |
| Good evening. Appreciate your time this evening to talk through some capital finance options for, as Cameron mentioned, some of | 00:22:34 | |
| the counties. | 00:22:38 | |
| Larger infrastructure projects. | 00:22:42 | |
| As well as some potential facility improvements going forward. | 00:22:44 | |
| Before we begin and just kind of look at what capital financing options might look like. | 00:22:49 | |
| Let's start with where the county is presently with your existing debt service. | 00:22:54 | |
| Presently in your 2025 budget, the County did not have any levy for debt service. Your existing principal and interest payments | 00:23:00 | |
| are paid from sales tax revenue, Clearview operations and and Hwy. operations. | 00:23:07 | |
| What we show in this chart. | 00:23:15 | |
| As an example, as if a portion of the debt service that's presently paid by sales tax. | 00:23:17 | |
| Were to be incorporated into a tax levy for your 2026 budget. | 00:23:23 | |
| That amount would be approximately $944,250. We'll talk about why we're looking at that in a few moments. | 00:23:28 | |
| But what that would mean to your? | 00:23:35 | |
| Tax rate per thousand. It would add $0.08 per thousand if you converted a portion of your sales tax. | 00:23:37 | |
| Supported debt to levy. | 00:23:43 | |
| So far a $300,000 property that would be about. | 00:23:46 | |
| $25.47 per year. | 00:23:49 | |
| So. | 00:23:53 | |
| Part of the reason we're showing this is when we look at some options in the future for financing capital projects. | 00:23:54 | |
| It starts to kind of. | 00:23:59 | |
| Slowly ramp up. | 00:24:01 | |
| Your levy for debt service and that tax rate impact versus going from zero to. | 00:24:02 | |
| To financing some projects with that and levying for that full amount of debt service. | 00:24:07 | |
| In this financing illustration, we've identified. | 00:24:15 | |
| Financing some projects through the issuance of general obligation debt every other year. | 00:24:18 | |
| So these are some estimates that we worked on with staff just to identify some capital funding amounts. So you'll see these fall | 00:24:25 | |
| into 3 categories. | 00:24:29 | |
| Road improvements, some tower improvements related to communications infrastructure and then facility improvements. | 00:24:34 | |
| So the amount total amount in 2026 is 37,000,020. | 00:24:41 | |
| 28 it's 57 million and in 20-30 it's 37 million. | 00:24:46 | |
| So essentially. | 00:24:51 | |
| Occurring and going through the debt issuance process every other year. | 00:24:53 | |
| What we've done in our financing plan is really structured the debt and amortize it over. | 00:24:59 | |
| Considering useful wife of the assets, so all of the road projects are amortized over 10 years. The tower and facility | 00:25:05 | |
| improvements are amortized over 20. | 00:25:11 | |
| To take into account kind of the useful life of those assets. So we showed estimated debt service schedules for those borrowing | 00:25:17 | |
| amounts every other year. | 00:25:21 | |
| To kind of fund that infrastructure. | 00:25:27 | |
| So I won't go through the debt schedules themselves, which you'll just see for each issuance, we show the debt related to each | 00:25:30 | |
| capital asset being financed, roads, towers and facilities. | 00:25:35 | |
| So it's really a plan that covers out out through 2030. | 00:25:41 | |
| In terms of the looking at kind of what that does to your tax rate for debt service? | 00:25:47 | |
| We're going to kind of work our way across here from from left to right to kind of show that impact. So as I mentioned, if the | 00:25:54 | |
| county levied a portion of its existing debt service in 2026 at $944,250. | 00:26:02 | |
| You know that would be the the fiscal impact on the 2026 budget. So again that is about. | 00:26:09 | |
| 8-8 cents per thousand of value for 300,000 value property. That's $25 a year for debt service. | 00:26:16 | |
| And these columns under proposed at in 20/26/2028 and 2030. We show the gross principal and interest repaid for the debt service | 00:26:24 | |
| for each of those issues. And then we show a portion of the. | 00:26:32 | |
| New debt continued to be repaid by. | 00:26:39 | |
| Sales tax. | 00:26:43 | |
| So the sales tax revenue at this illustration. | 00:26:45 | |
| Is eventually capped out at about 3.5 million for debt. | 00:26:48 | |
| It's increasing about 2% per year until we hit hit that $3.5 billion maximum cap that we set for this model. | 00:26:52 | |
| So when we look at how that could impact your property tax levy in this levy change from prior year. | 00:27:02 | |
| You started with a modest debt service amount of 9 or 44,250 for your 2026 budget and then. | 00:27:09 | |
| Incorporate debt service every other year. | 00:27:17 | |
| From. | 00:27:20 | |
| 2026 to 2027, the levy for debt service would increase approximately $637,000. | 00:27:22 | |
| From the prior year. | 00:27:29 | |
| So for our 300,000. | 00:27:31 | |
| Valued property. | 00:27:33 | |
| That would result in $40 in the. | 00:27:34 | |
| Total tax bill for the county for debt service. | 00:27:37 | |
| So that increase over prior year is about $15. | 00:27:40 | |
| And then you'll see the debt service levy increase annually per year. | 00:27:44 | |
| Is about $1,580,000 and so you'll see that total tax rate for debt service. | 00:27:49 | |
| Starts to ramp up $8.08 per 1013 cents per thousand and gradually starts to peak out at about $0.62 per thousand. | 00:27:55 | |
| Then this far right hand column we show the increase each year for debt service to fund this full. | 00:28:04 | |
| Program of capital improvements with projects funded every other year from 2026 through 2030. | 00:28:11 | |
| So that increase over the fire over the prior year kind of ranges from you know $15 at the lower end to about $36 increase over | 00:28:18 | |
| the prior year for our 300,000 valued property. | 00:28:25 | |
| You'll see going forward in our model, we kind of show in 2033 the debt service levy starts to decrease. That's really to account | 00:28:33 | |
| for the end of our planning model. | 00:28:38 | |
| If the county continued on a. | 00:28:43 | |
| Every other year debt issuance schedule, the next debt issuance would be in 2032, which would hit your levy in 2033, which is why | 00:28:46 | |
| we've built them. | 00:28:50 | |
| A decline. | 00:28:55 | |
| In the. | 00:28:56 | |
| Tax levy increase for that year for debt service. | 00:28:57 | |
| So this is the illustrate. | 00:29:00 | |
| As Cameron mentioned, kind of incorporating some of your. | 00:29:02 | |
| Larger ticket capital investments to kind of amortize that over? | 00:29:06 | |
| Their useful life. | 00:29:11 | |
| And have future generations that will benefit from those assets help to pay for it by incorporating the debt service into your | 00:29:13 | |
| levy. | 00:29:16 | |
| But showing that levee kind of gradually increasing and then that increase year over year. | 00:29:21 | |
| Just for debt service capping out about $1,580,000. | 00:29:26 | |
| To just look at a different scenario, same borrowing amounts, but in this case, if you continue to your current practice of not | 00:29:35 | |
| having a levy for debt service for your existing debt that's outstanding. | 00:29:41 | |
| So 2026 your debt service levy would be 0. | 00:29:47 | |
| As you start to incorporate, you know the same amount of debt service that. | 00:29:52 | |
| Was in the previous illustration. It just results in a more, you know, significant. | 00:29:56 | |
| Uptick in terms of that fiscal impact, so you go from. | 00:30:00 | |
| Obviously no tax rate per thousand to $0.13 per thousand, which on a 300,000 valued property would be about $40 a year for debt | 00:30:05 | |
| service. | 00:30:09 | |
| So. | 00:30:13 | |
| Back at the previous slide. | 00:30:14 | |
| Kind of. | 00:30:16 | |
| You know, shows about a $25 increase, then a $40 increase. Here it would just go from 0 to $40. | 00:30:17 | |
| So just kind of shows, you know. | 00:30:24 | |
| You can look at different options in terms of how you layer in that impact in terms of. | 00:30:26 | |
| Incorporating a debt service levy when there isn't 1 presently. | 00:30:32 | |
| One other item we like to look at is really your state. | 00:30:37 | |
| Borrowing limit. | 00:30:42 | |
| Which is the same for all counties and municipalities. The amount of general obligation. | 00:30:43 | |
| Principal outstanding cannot exceed 5% of the county's total equalized value. | 00:30:49 | |
| So at the end of fiscal year 2025, the county has 16,995,000 of debt outstanding. | 00:30:55 | |
| You're at about 2.96% of your statutory debt limit, which leaves you. | 00:31:02 | |
| 557 million of borrowing capacity. | 00:31:09 | |
| With these financings every other year at the dollar amount that we identified for illustration. | 00:31:12 | |
| For roads, facilities. | 00:31:18 | |
| And other capital items you're looking at, you know that picking out about 15% of your utilization. | 00:31:20 | |
| So really it's as far as legal borrowing capacity, the county has sufficient borrowing capacity. It's really more about. | 00:31:28 | |
| Budgetary impacts levy impacts affordability because legally you have, you know, sufficient borrowing capacity to fund. | 00:31:35 | |
| Capital improvements at the levels that we've identified in our model. | 00:31:43 | |
| So again, just to kind of summarize this model, so the debt was structured to really arrive at a. | 00:31:48 | |
| Consistent levy increase year over year also take into account. | 00:31:54 | |
| The existing debt service and have that. | 00:31:59 | |
| Layered in as you kind of ramp up your your debt. | 00:32:03 | |
| The levy again decreases in 2033 to account for. | 00:32:06 | |
| Future debt, if that were to occur beyond our planning period and your debt capacity utilization reaches about 15%. So it's really | 00:32:11 | |
| more about the levy impact in terms of how that impacts your budget. | 00:32:17 | |
| You just mentioned that there's an extra 0. | 00:32:23 | |
| So it's not. | 00:32:26 | |
| Oh, yes, correct. Yeah, 1,580,000, yeah, there, there is an extra 0 in there, yes. So if we just go back. | 00:32:28 | |
| Again, it's that. | 00:32:37 | |
| Million. | 00:32:40 | |
| 550 in this illustration, and then if we go back to the other one. | 00:32:42 | |
| That kind of ramps up at that million 580. So here's where that number CS apology is extra. | 00:32:46 | |
| Extra 0 typed in there so. | 00:32:51 | |
| Yeah, that's right. That's right. | 00:32:56 | |
| Yes, Cameron gets the Gold Star. | 00:32:58 | |
| So this is again just some illustrations just to kind of show how a. | 00:33:02 | |
| Financing of capital improvements, kind of through issuance of debt could be incorporated into your existing budget. | 00:33:07 | |
| And to kind of look at kind of a multi year plan, but only look at issuance every other year. | 00:33:14 | |
| And really trying to arrive at arrive at a levee impact that's fairly consistent for budgetary purposes. | 00:33:20 | |
| Thank you. Could I ask Greg that before you're finished? I know you mentioned it, but. | 00:33:27 | |
| Would you just maybe touch again? This is. | 00:33:31 | |
| Based on our conversations. | 00:33:34 | |
| But it's a, it's a, It's a guess and a Gee, here's what it could look like. | 00:33:35 | |
| Is that correct? Correct. | 00:33:40 | |
| Correct. | 00:33:42 | |
| Yeah. It's really all driven by kind of these dollar amounts which were kind of identified as kind of some initial planning | 00:33:43 | |
| estimate, so. | 00:33:46 | |
| You know, while you're looking at some different amounts over kind of the the multi year period, we're trying to structure the | 00:33:51 | |
| debt to take into account the useful life of the assets. | 00:33:55 | |
| But also try to arrive at a levee impact that's fairly consistent year over year. | 00:34:00 | |
| For budgetary planning purposes. | 00:34:07 | |
| We have a question if you're ready for questions. | 00:34:11 | |
| Supervisor Der. | 00:34:16 | |
| I just think this is really good, sound municipal policy. | 00:34:21 | |
| And we previously. | 00:34:25 | |
| Denied. | 00:34:27 | |
| A $10 million one percent bond. | 00:34:28 | |
| And my I actually used to work for a municipal bond firm and so. | 00:34:31 | |
| It was pretty astounding. | 00:34:35 | |
| And it was. | 00:34:37 | |
| Honestly, it was just a lack. | 00:34:38 | |
| Of connecting that municipal finance is different from your checkbook. | 00:34:40 | |
| And. | 00:34:44 | |
| If you looked at the debt. | 00:34:45 | |
| That we take on for the size of our county and the taxpayers. | 00:34:46 | |
| We would all be bankrupt if we treated. | 00:34:51 | |
| Our county financing, the way we treat our checkbook. | 00:34:54 | |
| Because we literally cannot fund it every year without. | 00:34:59 | |
| Dramatic. | 00:35:02 | |
| Immediate tax increases. | 00:35:04 | |
| Otherwise we have to let things decline, like the roads that. | 00:35:07 | |
| Everybody's been complaining to me about for years, and so this is truly what. | 00:35:11 | |
| Most. | 00:35:17 | |
| Municipalities. | 00:35:18 | |
| And cities. | 00:35:19 | |
| And state governments do. | 00:35:20 | |
| To fund long term capital projects and I actually think. | 00:35:23 | |
| It's irresponsible for us to just constantly look at the short term, year to year. | 00:35:27 | |
| And so. | 00:35:33 | |
| If you look at Clearview. | 00:35:35 | |
| That amazing building. | 00:35:36 | |
| Right was built. | 00:35:38 | |
| By financing it. | 00:35:40 | |
| And the only thing the county pays? | 00:35:43 | |
| Is just the debt on the bond, which is. | 00:35:45 | |
| You know, coming to its end. | 00:35:47 | |
| And we get money from Clearview. They're like an enterprise fund, like we've made a lot of money from that investment and we've | 00:35:49 | |
| also provided excellent services. | 00:35:54 | |
| So. | 00:35:59 | |
| When you when you fix infrastructure, it's long term. | 00:35:59 | |
| And we? | 00:36:03 | |
| End up providing a lot of value. | 00:36:05 | |
| To future county boards. | 00:36:07 | |
| And excellent service. | 00:36:10 | |
| To the. | 00:36:12 | |
| People that are going to use these things and drive on these roads. | 00:36:13 | |
| But it's also fiscally responsible to spread stuff out over. | 00:36:16 | |
| 10 or 15 or. | 00:36:21 | |
| Were 20 years. | 00:36:23 | |
| That's that's actually normal and responsible. | 00:36:24 | |
| Of funding and. | 00:36:27 | |
| Obviously they've put. | 00:36:29 | |
| Tremendous amount of. | 00:36:30 | |
| Thought into this. | 00:36:31 | |
| And they're showing that this is. | 00:36:32 | |
| You know, for individual homeowner dollars. | 00:36:34 | |
| Just, umm. | 00:36:38 | |
| A few dollars a year. | 00:36:38 | |
| And I think most people would pay that if they knew they could get their roads. | 00:36:40 | |
| Actually done. | 00:36:44 | |
| And remember, this isn't giving us a road rating of A. | 00:36:47 | |
| I think. | 00:36:50 | |
| We can ask them but I think it was a rating more of like B minus or C right? This is just to keep our roads average. | 00:36:51 | |
| And we'd have to borrow a lot more to get. | 00:36:58 | |
| An A rating. | 00:37:00 | |
| So. | 00:37:01 | |
| That's what I have. | 00:37:02 | |
| Anyone else with? | 00:37:05 | |
| Supervisor Van de Zen. | 00:37:07 | |
| I didn't catch it if you said it, but. | 00:37:11 | |
| What's the? | 00:37:12 | |
| Interest on that? | 00:37:14 | |
| Bond interest. | 00:37:15 | |
| So in these illustrations, so for 2026. | 00:37:17 | |
| So when miscible bonds are sold, it's not uncommon that different. | 00:37:21 | |
| Different years will have a different interest rate, but the interest rate is fixed at the time that the debt is sold, so it's | 00:37:26 | |
| locked in place. | 00:37:29 | |
| Typically there's a call feature, an optional call feature that allows you to refinance or make prepayments at some point in the | 00:37:33 | |
| future. But what we're estimating for the financing in 2026, which is rates that are you know higher than what we're presently | 00:37:39 | |
| seeing in the market, but we want to build in kind of some cushion of. | 00:37:45 | |
| 2.6 to about 4.84%. So we ran this analysis. | 00:37:51 | |
| Kind of earlier kind of in September discussions with staff, we were adding about 45 basis points to these rates. A basis point is | 00:37:57 | |
| .01. | 00:38:01 | |
| Percent. So since that time we've kind of seen. | 00:38:05 | |
| Bond yields kind of generally start to decline, but this is a conservative estimate, so. | 00:38:09 | |
| You know, was mentioned kind of where interest rates, you know, have been historically. | 00:38:14 | |
| When you still look at these rates and look at where municipal bond rates have been over, you know, the last 25 to 30 years. | 00:38:19 | |
| We are still in any historically low interest rate environment, not as low as it was. | 00:38:25 | |
| A few years ago, but those were rock bottom. | 00:38:30 | |
| Low rates, but it's, you know, it's still. | 00:38:32 | |
| You can still get capital at attractive interest rates. | 00:38:35 | |
| Anyone else? | 00:38:42 | |
| Supervisor Houchin. | 00:38:46 | |
| Thank you. | 00:38:47 | |
| So in this model. | 00:38:48 | |
| You're doing roads every other year. | 00:38:50 | |
| So. | 00:38:52 | |
| How do we pay for roads? | 00:38:53 | |
| We do roads every year. | 00:38:55 | |
| We would not do them every year. | 00:38:57 | |
| We would, we would, we would do them every year. So. | 00:38:58 | |
| In this In this. | 00:39:02 | |
| Just. | 00:39:04 | |
| Kick at the kick at the cat. Or can if you like cats, we'll say can anyway at this. | 00:39:04 | |
| This what we're talking about doing here is. | 00:39:11 | |
| The borrowing for roads, we're borrowing the dollars enough to accommodate all the projects that we would be putting through those | 00:39:14 | |
| two years. | 00:39:18 | |
| So. | 00:39:22 | |
| We're borrowing every other year because there's a cost. | 00:39:24 | |
| Associated with all the. | 00:39:27 | |
| Folks involved in going to market and borrowing the dollars. | 00:39:28 | |
| This way we're we're reducing that. | 00:39:32 | |
| Plus it's a projection, so. | 00:39:34 | |
| Ebbs and flows, but. | 00:39:38 | |
| That's how we would cover it. So yes, the projects are still happening every other year. | 00:39:39 | |
| But our plans for how to borrow the excuse me happening every year, but. | 00:39:43 | |
| The borrowings just every other. | 00:39:48 | |
| And you think all we're going to need for facilities is 20 million? | 00:39:49 | |
| That just doesn't sound like. | 00:39:52 | |
| Well, I think we probably need more. | 00:39:54 | |
| Yeah, it depends on what we need to do with our. | 00:39:56 | |
| Right. But I think right now looking at. | 00:39:59 | |
| Existing facilities. | 00:40:02 | |
| What we what we truly, truly need and what needs to happen, we still have a little ways out. If you're looking at the screen and | 00:40:05 | |
| see that 2028 is the first time dollars are. | 00:40:09 | |
| Included there. | 00:40:14 | |
| It's at least in part because. | 00:40:15 | |
| We're we're expecting that. | 00:40:18 | |
| We're going to figure out what some of those costs are and take some time to plan for how we. | 00:40:20 | |
| How we fix? | 00:40:24 | |
| Whatever The thing is, and his towers include radios. | 00:40:26 | |
| But again, this is. | 00:40:34 | |
| This is taking a look at what we knew we fell short on. | 00:40:35 | |
| Right up so roads constitute of everything that we did not fund in 2020 for 2026. | 00:40:39 | |
| Through 30 capital improvement plan. | 00:40:47 | |
| That what we have for next year in that plan is 21 million I think total. | 00:40:49 | |
| Ten. Well, whatever the number is 10 million. | 00:40:55 | |
| Only 10 million. | 00:40:58 | |
| Is roadway projects. | 00:40:59 | |
| The rest is for facilities or towers and we have built out such that. | 00:41:01 | |
| We can. We can talk through and we would. | 00:41:06 | |
| Obviously refine a lot of this before we. | 00:41:08 | |
| Actually brought something back to to vote on. | 00:41:11 | |
| Supervisor Sigmund. | 00:41:16 | |
| Thank you very much. Did I see correctly on the slides that? | 00:41:18 | |
| The property tax and levy impact for a $300,000 house is actually going to be less if there's no. | 00:41:23 | |
| Debt tax levy. | 00:41:31 | |
| Then if there is one. | 00:41:33 | |
| We didn't compare. We didn't compare debt, tax money, but maybe. | 00:41:36 | |
| Well, I thought there was. That's with that tax levy. | 00:41:40 | |
| It goes up to $186 in. | 00:41:43 | |
| 2020 some 20-30 something. | 00:41:47 | |
| But if you go to the one without the tax levy. | 00:41:49 | |
| It's only 183. | 00:41:54 | |
| So I'm saying. | 00:41:55 | |
| It goes up more when there's a debt tax levy than if there isn't. | 00:41:57 | |
| Yeah, I. | 00:42:00 | |
| I would turn to Mackenzie I. | 00:42:02 | |
| We just. | 00:42:04 | |
| I just. | 00:42:06 | |
| Talk with the paper earlier, I don't remember what exactly for the $300,000 home. It was like 1000. | 00:42:07 | |
| And 100 some odd dollars if we did nothing, if we just went from. | 00:42:13 | |
| Yet to last year to this year, we're at 1000. | 00:42:18 | |
| And I think $5 or something of that nature for that $300,000 home. | 00:42:22 | |
| So it would go down in. | 00:42:26 | |
| Nominally. | 00:42:28 | |
| And I think. | 00:42:31 | |
| That's what. | 00:42:31 | |
| Cameron was trying to demonstrate. | 00:42:32 | |
| That. | 00:42:34 | |
| It we exacerbate that when we actually apply inflation right and we go back. | 00:42:35 | |
| Your your taxes have. | 00:42:41 | |
| Basically reduced and that's that. | 00:42:43 | |
| In whole numbers. | 00:42:46 | |
| Over the last 10 years, you've seen him drop by. | 00:42:47 | |
| Almost $6 million, right? | 00:42:50 | |
| As contributing to the whole. | 00:42:52 | |
| County budget. | 00:42:55 | |
| All right, I probably wouldn't recommend you go out into the general public and actually try to convince them their taxes have | 00:42:57 | |
| gone down. | 00:43:00 | |
| If you. | 00:43:03 | |
| Figure inflation that's. | 00:43:04 | |
| Not the way to do it. | 00:43:06 | |
| But. | 00:43:08 | |
| I don't think anybody in this room here is against buildings. | 00:43:10 | |
| Towers. | 00:43:14 | |
| That kind of infrastructure with borrowing. | 00:43:15 | |
| But see. | 00:43:18 | |
| That is not roads. Roads get done every year. | 00:43:19 | |
| Roads should be budgeted for every year. | 00:43:23 | |
| Because that's the primary responsibility of how we department. | 00:43:27 | |
| And there's no reason that we have to figure that. Well, we don't have money for roles, but we have money for everything else in | 00:43:31 | |
| the highway department. | 00:43:34 | |
| I think that we're in error here to include roads in this. | 00:43:38 | |
| And I think. | 00:43:42 | |
| Money wise, it probably would. | 00:43:43 | |
| Substantiate that belief. | 00:43:46 | |
| Just. | 00:43:52 | |
| Backing away from how you figured inflation and everything. | 00:43:53 | |
| I was on a school board 20 some years ago on and this old Duffer said. | 00:43:59 | |
| Figures lie and liars figure. | 00:44:04 | |
| We have reached pretty far here. | 00:44:06 | |
| To make us feel good. | 00:44:09 | |
| About raising. | 00:44:11 | |
| Everything. | 00:44:13 | |
| And the public's not going to go for it. I mean, in my district we have a town and a village. | 00:44:14 | |
| That is screaming already because. | 00:44:19 | |
| They're a tax. What would you call it? | 00:44:22 | |
| They pull taxes out of their pockets, too. | 00:44:27 | |
| And now the county's coming and saying, well, we're only going to pull this much. | 00:44:30 | |
| That'd be fine if that's. | 00:44:34 | |
| The only thing that happened, but those tax jurisdictions are also pulling things out. | 00:44:35 | |
| I I mean. | 00:44:42 | |
| Looks good. | 00:44:42 | |
| But somehow I have a little bit of a feeling and I talked with you a few weeks back. | 00:44:44 | |
| And every time I said something, you. | 00:44:48 | |
| Nodded your head. Yeah, you're right, you're right, you know? | 00:44:51 | |
| But. | 00:44:54 | |
| This this thing came forward anyhow, so I'm trying to figure out how you can say that I'm right but yet. | 00:44:55 | |
| Don't change anything, you know. That's what I'm trying to figure out here. | 00:45:01 | |
| But I would recommend not. | 00:45:05 | |
| Doing the roads. | 00:45:06 | |
| In this kind of manner. | 00:45:07 | |
| Let's just fix our roads and not 22 miles. | 00:45:09 | |
| We don't need it. My Rd. got fixed this year. | 00:45:12 | |
| Everybody celebrating. | 00:45:15 | |
| It was 50 years old already. | 00:45:17 | |
| And now we're trying to fix them at 22 because they're no good. | 00:45:19 | |
| I don't think so. I think we can back down to 15 we. | 00:45:22 | |
| Lower that demand for. | 00:45:26 | |
| Money. | 00:45:27 | |
| And. | 00:45:29 | |
| I think we have an easier time budgeting for it in the highway department where it belongs. | 00:45:30 | |
| I mean, there's a lot of things I think should be considered, but. | 00:45:35 | |
| Borrowing for Rose isn't one of them. | 00:45:39 | |
| Like I say, buildings and towers, things like that, fine. | 00:45:41 | |
| You know, because that. | 00:45:44 | |
| That's more longer term, but roads are doing every year. | 00:45:45 | |
| Every year. Every year, so. | 00:45:48 | |
| Thank you. | 00:45:51 | |
| Anyone else? | 00:45:55 | |
| I can respond when we're done with this section. | 00:45:58 | |
| Supervisor Grukenberger. | 00:46:00 | |
| Thank you, Mr. Chairman. | 00:46:03 | |
| Would you be so kind? I mean, there's a lot of numbers and charts and stuff and there's. | 00:46:05 | |
| No paper on the desk for me to. | 00:46:09 | |
| See any of these? | 00:46:12 | |
| Calculations but. | 00:46:14 | |
| If you would be so kind as to go back to that. | 00:46:16 | |
| 628 Thirty chart. | 00:46:19 | |
| So is your. | 00:46:26 | |
| Perception then, that we would borrow 22 million every other year. | 00:46:27 | |
| To the point where over 10, excuse me, over. | 00:46:31 | |
| 20 years, we're going to borrow 200 and. | 00:46:36 | |
| $20 million. | 00:46:38 | |
| We've just accounted for, I understand, but we need a long term plan here. | 00:46:40 | |
| And it's not sustainable. I mean, if we borrow 22 million come in 2032. | 00:46:45 | |
| You know we're drinking this elixir. | 00:46:50 | |
| And we need to. | 00:46:52 | |
| To fix our roads, if this is the plan that we're going to take for our roads, that's going to have to extend into Infinity. | 00:46:54 | |
| 22,000,000 / 10 years will be $220 million. | 00:47:01 | |
| That's what I see when I see this chart borrowing 22 million every other year. | 00:47:06 | |
| Because otherwise, what are you going to do in 2032 and besides? | 00:47:11 | |
| You know just what I see here. You already got $131 million in borrowing over the next, what, 6 years? | 00:47:15 | |
| Yeah, so. | 00:47:22 | |
| Bear with me. | 00:47:26 | |
| What I would explain is this. | 00:47:28 | |
| Of the borrowing, the 22 were basically saying about $11 million per year for roads and that's today's dollars things you know | 00:47:30 | |
| will grow overtime, but we'll just. | 00:47:34 | |
| We'll just think about it in today's dollars. | 00:47:39 | |
| So. | 00:47:43 | |
| What what Ehlers tried to illustrate here is that in 30. | 00:47:45 | |
| You're 33, right? You're going to start to see. | 00:47:49 | |
| The the. | 00:47:52 | |
| Debt service reduce will start to drop off. | 00:47:54 | |
| And so you could continue to plan. | 00:47:57 | |
| And finance in the future and continue to. | 00:48:00 | |
| Pay for those roads in the future. | 00:48:03 | |
| And so it wouldn't drop off right? You just. | 00:48:06 | |
| Keep it flat. | 00:48:08 | |
| Another way that you could do it is you could say, hey, we don't want to do debt service for these roads. | 00:48:10 | |
| We're going to do a referendum. | 00:48:15 | |
| And we're going to put 11,000,000 on the, on the, on the tax levy to take care of roads because it's it's stepped up. | 00:48:18 | |
| And then it's you're not paying the interest, but you would still be increasing the taxes to cover that. | 00:48:25 | |
| That portion right? And So what I'm trying to explain here is, is that. | 00:48:31 | |
| What ELLERS has tried to demonstrate with the property taxes tailing off is that you will have. | 00:48:36 | |
| Flexibility or ability to take on that. | 00:48:42 | |
| That 22 million. | 00:48:45 | |
| Dollars in the future? | 00:48:46 | |
| If that makes sense. | 00:48:48 | |
| And the difference in just to. | 00:48:49 | |
| To one other thought to and I'll. I'll be quiet after that. | 00:48:52 | |
| Is you could go out for referendum today if you wanted to and you know that you need to cover roads, there's $11 million worth of | 00:48:56 | |
| extra roads and, and just put it on on the tax levy and. | 00:49:02 | |
| Great. | 00:49:09 | |
| The the thing about that is those that it's going to create this big jump. | 00:49:11 | |
| In taxes in 11-GO. | 00:49:15 | |
| By using financing. | 00:49:18 | |
| You're kind of ratcheting up. | 00:49:20 | |
| To that and then on the back end, that's the time policy wise, philosophy wise you'd want to think about, well maybe we don't want | 00:49:22 | |
| to do debt service anymore for roads. We really need to cover this. | 00:49:28 | |
| It needs to be a part of our operations. And then and then you go to referendum and you say, hey, it's not going to increase your | 00:49:35 | |
| taxes because. | 00:49:39 | |
| Our debt service is falling off and you could. | 00:49:43 | |
| You could plan for that, if you will. | 00:49:46 | |
| But that's. | 00:49:49 | |
| That's that. | 00:49:50 | |
| Financial planning and. | 00:49:51 | |
| Some philosophy and. | 00:49:53 | |
| Policy discussions that you're going to have to. | 00:49:54 | |
| Make in the future. | 00:49:56 | |
| I just. | 00:50:00 | |
| And you know, I absolutely. | 00:50:01 | |
| Miller 8 and discussion on a $300,000 home or whatever it is because that same $300,000 home. | 00:50:05 | |
| Has increased in value to 318,000. | 00:50:12 | |
| Now certainly I'm a smart enough man to know that the assessment. | 00:50:16 | |
| Doesn't change. | 00:50:20 | |
| But the allocation based on equalized value is going to be higher for that community or that municipality and the portion of the | 00:50:21 | |
| taxes are going to be assigned to that $300,000 home is going to go up by that same 6%. | 00:50:28 | |
| OK, so taxes don't go down? | 00:50:35 | |
| It's the fallacy. | 00:50:38 | |
| Right. | 00:50:39 | |
| That that mill rate somehow or another makes my taxes go down. It doesn't. The only reason that mill rate went down is because my | 00:50:40 | |
| property value went up. | 00:50:44 | |
| So I, I, I, I hate the premise that we start talking mill rate and somehow or another your taxes are going down because the mill | 00:50:49 | |
| rate went down. The mill rate didn't go down. | 00:50:54 | |
| But I mean, the, the, the levy goes down now we're talking some serious business, right? | 00:50:59 | |
| And this is not Levy going down, this is debt Levy. This is. | 00:51:04 | |
| I I even if. | 00:51:09 | |
| If that chart were to be true, and then, you know, the only reason that that Levy is going to go down is because, you know, you | 00:51:11 | |
| stop borrowing, but I have no clue what you're going to do come 2032. | 00:51:16 | |
| Because you're going to be a $22 million hole. | 00:51:21 | |
| In your budget? | 00:51:24 | |
| That you're going to have to fix. | 00:51:26 | |
| Once we start taking 22 million unless you do the 22 million. | 00:51:29 | |
| Over. | 00:51:34 | |
| 20 years. | 00:51:35 | |
| The length of the bonding. | 00:51:36 | |
| Or if it's ten I. | 00:51:38 | |
| If I can see the chart again if it was a 10 year thing. | 00:51:40 | |
| Then it would be 5 years, right? | 00:51:43 | |
| It would be 10 years. | 00:51:45 | |
| Back one. | 00:51:51 | |
| So it's 10 years. | 00:51:53 | |
| So after. | 00:51:54 | |
| 20 years. | 00:51:55 | |
| If you did 22 million over. | 00:51:57 | |
| 10 years, when one falls off, the other one would come on. | 00:51:59 | |
| But you you'd have to do it that way. But you you'd have to absorb. | 00:52:04 | |
| The bonding, the the the cost of those bonds. | 00:52:08 | |
| Ultimately. | 00:52:12 | |
| It's a $220 million borrowing. | 00:52:13 | |
| In in my eyes. | 00:52:15 | |
| And we, we need to start to make cuts, serious cuts. | 00:52:18 | |
| That are. | 00:52:23 | |
| Long term. | 00:52:25 | |
| OK. | 00:52:26 | |
| That not these band aids. We've we've we've had band aids too long Arpa. | 00:52:27 | |
| Hid this problem. | 00:52:31 | |
| It really did. | 00:52:33 | |
| And now we need to. | 00:52:35 | |
| To find money. | 00:52:37 | |
| To do our roads. | 00:52:38 | |
| We haven't made cuts. | 00:52:42 | |
| I I haven't heard the presentation where you said these are the things that you said. You made a few cuts. | 00:52:44 | |
| But. | 00:52:48 | |
| I don't know what those cuts are in the budget because I can't identify them in the paperwork. It's not in the narrative. | 00:52:49 | |
| But we need sustainable long term cuts. | 00:52:55 | |
| That aren't supported by. | 00:52:58 | |
| Debt service levy. | 00:53:01 | |
| This is I mean if I'm. | 00:53:03 | |
| If I'm right, you got $131 million in borrowing here over the next six years. | 00:53:05 | |
| Am I correct? | 00:53:10 | |
| That's what you're proposing. | 00:53:12 | |
| Yeah, but in some of its twenty year bond and some of its 10 year bond, but. | 00:53:14 | |
| All told that. | 00:53:19 | |
| It's probably 3 to 4 million a year. You're going to add 10% to the levy. | 00:53:20 | |
| Right. I mean our levees 37 million, this is going to be about 4 million a year. | 00:53:26 | |
| What gets adding to the added to the levy is. | 00:53:34 | |
| Not to the, not to our levy. This will be a debt service levy which would be on top of it. | 00:53:37 | |
| But it still would be what, like 4 million? | 00:53:42 | |
| Yep. | 00:53:45 | |
| Debt service levy, but well, yeah, actually it's going to 9 million a year. | 00:53:47 | |
| Ramps up tonight. | 00:53:52 | |
| Ramps up the 9 million. | 00:53:55 | |
| So our current levies at what, 3637? | 00:53:56 | |
| So it's a 25% increase? | 00:54:00 | |
| That's what people are going to see, a 25% increase. You can put it in little dollars and stuff like that, but you know the. | 00:54:03 | |
| The value of a home increases over those same 10 years. | 00:54:09 | |
| So that $300,000 home over 10 years at 5% a year certainly is no longer worth. | 00:54:13 | |
| $300,000 You can't keep that column static and then increase all the other ones. | 00:54:18 | |
| That's why the tax rate shown. You can do the math as the. | 00:54:24 | |
| Home value increases you apply the tax rate per. | 00:54:27 | |
| 100,000 of value and you can see how that changes, but it's pretty easy for me to say if our taxes are. | 00:54:31 | |
| $36 million levy and we're going to add 9 million. That's the 25% increase. | 00:54:36 | |
| That's what people are going to see. | 00:54:41 | |
| It happens. | 00:54:43 | |
| That's the math that. | 00:54:45 | |
| Shows up on. | 00:54:46 | |
| My tax bill. | 00:54:47 | |
| In in response to some of that. | 00:54:56 | |
| The. | 00:54:59 | |
| Property goes up 300 to 300,000. | 00:55:00 | |
| From 180 that it was 10 years ago. | 00:55:04 | |
| And as a percent of your value of your tax of your property, your taxes are. | 00:55:07 | |
| Are no higher than they were before. | 00:55:13 | |
| That's fallacy. | 00:55:16 | |
| The allocation to the municipality increases based on that equalized value. | 00:55:18 | |
| Supervisor Durer. | 00:55:25 | |
| I wanted to clarify. | 00:55:27 | |
| I mean, all the folks up here understand this, but I just want to clarify that. | 00:55:30 | |
| Basic. | 00:55:34 | |
| Definitions of infrastructure include. | 00:55:35 | |
| Physical things that go into the future. | 00:55:38 | |
| Structure. | 00:55:42 | |
| That. | 00:55:43 | |
| Roads is like the number one thing that would be called infrastructure. | 00:55:44 | |
| Railroads. | 00:55:49 | |
| Bridges. | 00:55:50 | |
| Water systems. Power grids. | 00:55:52 | |
| There's other things like there are soft infrastructure. | 00:55:55 | |
| Which are sort of pseudo. | 00:55:58 | |
| Services like education. | 00:56:00 | |
| Et cetera, right. So we're talking about municipal finance for hard. | 00:56:03 | |
| Basic. | 00:56:07 | |
| Every. | 00:56:09 | |
| Almost every municipality has. | 00:56:12 | |
| Funding to get it done. | 00:56:14 | |
| Municipal funding and they do municipal bonds and it. | 00:56:16 | |
| And the most? | 00:56:19 | |
| Core reason. | 00:56:21 | |
| Obviously, generally used is for. | 00:56:22 | |
| Hard infrastructure. | 00:56:25 | |
| So this is what what they said before was true. You want to just, you want to just have the do a referendum and then have the tax. | 00:56:27 | |
| In one year like. | 00:56:35 | |
| Boy would we get the calls right. So this is the. | 00:56:37 | |
| Prudent. | 00:56:40 | |
| Financially stable way. | 00:56:41 | |
| To do this. | 00:56:43 | |
| Supervisor Guckenberger. | 00:56:47 | |
| I'm sorry, I need to clarify something. So if we do a referendum. | 00:56:49 | |
| Then the entire bond would be paid off in one year. | 00:56:53 | |
| Or, well, then it wouldn't be. | 00:56:57 | |
| Skyrocketing one year. I mean you would still do a tenure or 20 year note. | 00:56:59 | |
| And you would amortize that? | 00:57:04 | |
| Payment over a longer period of time. | 00:57:06 | |
| Sure, it's going to skyrocket, but no different than any of these numbers up here are going to make it skyrocket if you borrow 22 | 00:57:09 | |
| million. | 00:57:12 | |
| It it's the same thing. | 00:57:15 | |
| Right, unless you say we're going to borrow $100 million in this said referendum. | 00:57:17 | |
| Yes, I think yes. | 00:57:23 | |
| You nailed it at the end there, OK. | 00:57:26 | |
| Supervisor Sigmund. | 00:57:31 | |
| Thank you. | 00:57:34 | |
| Why are we set on this 22 mile? | 00:57:38 | |
| Number. | 00:57:41 | |
| It's not necessary. | 00:57:43 | |
| We could lower that. You only require 7 million a year. | 00:57:44 | |
| Roads, again, are not. | 00:57:48 | |
| The hard infrastructure that we need to borrow for, like a water tower. | 00:57:51 | |
| Are you going to build a water tower every year? Are you going to work on the water tower every year? How about administration | 00:57:56 | |
| building? I mean, every year of the year we're going to do something to administration building. | 00:58:01 | |
| Roads are happening every year. | 00:58:06 | |
| Let's budget for them and do it. | 00:58:08 | |
| In a way that. | 00:58:10 | |
| This is not so aggressive because it's over. | 00:58:11 | |
| Done right now. | 00:58:15 | |
| And that's what's killing us. | 00:58:16 | |
| Cuts. I've heard that there are no cuts. | 00:58:19 | |
| Or very little. Very few. | 00:58:21 | |
| What services would we really lose? | 00:58:24 | |
| If we lost. | 00:58:27 | |
| 10% of our employees. | 00:58:29 | |
| I'm not saying we're going to do that, but just think of it. | 00:58:32 | |
| If 10% of our employees, I mean since 2020, we have gone from 750 employees to. | 00:58:34 | |
| 900. | 00:58:41 | |
| Or what is his last number, 875 to 900? | 00:58:42 | |
| That I just saw tonight. | 00:58:46 | |
| A few months ago I was told by. | 00:58:48 | |
| Our administrator. We were at 1000. | 00:58:50 | |
| But if any of that one quite right, but. | 00:58:52 | |
| We have increased. | 00:58:54 | |
| Almost 20%. | 00:58:56 | |
| In our employee numbers. | 00:58:58 | |
| Has our services increased by 20%? | 00:59:00 | |
| To a population that is level and stagnant and aging. | 00:59:03 | |
| Yes, but so do 20%. | 00:59:08 | |
| More people come to the. | 00:59:11 | |
| Buildings here and get services. | 00:59:14 | |
| I think. | 00:59:17 | |
| We have to look seriously at that. | 00:59:17 | |
| I've also heard that as far as. | 00:59:21 | |
| Cost of living adjustment goes. | 00:59:23 | |
| There is many counties that won't go above 3. | 00:59:26 | |
| Period. And if they go above 2. | 00:59:28 | |
| They require some staff reduction. | 00:59:31 | |
| If you want more than two. | 00:59:33 | |
| I mean. | 00:59:35 | |
| I guess the question is who? | 00:59:37 | |
| Who was consulted to? | 00:59:39 | |
| Find out what parameters are needed here at Dodge County to make us a leader. | 00:59:41 | |
| Of all the counties in excellence. | 00:59:46 | |
| I mean, I haven't made all the meetings, but I don't recall a conversation on what are we going to do here at Dodge County to. | 00:59:50 | |
| Lift us up to the top to. | 00:59:56 | |
| Make us an example of what we believe is. | 00:59:58 | |
| Level of excellence. | 01:00:02 | |
| Debt. We're going to borrow ourselves into prosperity. | 01:00:05 | |
| As a previous supervisor had mentioned. | 01:00:10 | |
| I think you can always present numbers in a way that looked. | 01:00:12 | |
| Good. | 01:00:16 | |
| But it's not always. | 01:00:18 | |
| Correct. | 01:00:19 | |
| So let's reconsider the roads. | 01:00:21 | |
| Let's just budget for them every year and do them and you won't see a jump every year because it's going to be a constant. And if | 01:00:23 | |
| we have to cut something, let's really seriously think about cutting some. | 01:00:28 | |
| That's what we do. | 01:00:34 | |
| The real world. | 01:00:35 | |
| Out here. | 01:00:36 | |
| Thanks. | 01:00:37 | |
| Supervisor Houchin. | 01:00:40 | |
| Thank you. | 01:00:41 | |
| As I. | 01:00:43 | |
| I've spent quite a bit of time on this budget and looking through it and. | 01:00:44 | |
| One thing that bothers me year after year after year. | 01:00:47 | |
| It's always we have to have money for roads. Why isn't that considered first? | 01:00:50 | |
| Why do we have to leave it to the end and then say oh. | 01:00:54 | |
| We don't have any money for roads when we know we have to have money for roads. | 01:00:57 | |
| And I think that's a failure in making the budget. | 01:01:01 | |
| That roads aren't a priority to start with. | 01:01:04 | |
| And then you can figure out. | 01:01:07 | |
| Well, maybe I don't need this, or I don't need that. | 01:01:08 | |
| We know Rhodes is something that's served. | 01:01:11 | |
| Everybody in the county. | 01:01:13 | |
| And more than some of our other services, Not that they aren't important too, but wrote. | 01:01:16 | |
| Everyone in the county has to use a Rd. | 01:01:21 | |
| To go somewhere. | 01:01:24 | |
| And we always leave it and I think that's a failure when we make the budget. | 01:01:26 | |
| That we do not. | 01:01:30 | |
| Look for roads first. Now as I've looked through this and I think we're going to, are we going to talk about specifics? | 01:01:32 | |
| Tonight. | 01:01:38 | |
| Yes. So right now. | 01:01:39 | |
| This is Q&A on the specific details. | 01:01:40 | |
| That were provided by Ellers if you have questions about. | 01:01:43 | |
| What they presented. | 01:01:47 | |
| Want to know where it came from? | 01:01:48 | |
| Why we're talking about it, That's what this part is, OK? | 01:01:50 | |
| And then? | 01:01:53 | |
| Following that presentation and and allowing for the discussion that's happened a little bit in advance of that. | 01:01:54 | |
| But this discussion. | 01:01:59 | |
| Then we're going to finish presenting specifics on the budget. | 01:02:01 | |
| And then I will talk more. | 01:02:04 | |
| Thank you. | 01:02:07 | |
| Thank you, Supervisor. | 01:02:08 | |
| Thank you. Mr. Chairman. I don't have a questions to make a statement, so I'll just hold my statement so we can move things along | 01:02:11 | |
| tonight. | 01:02:14 | |
| Supervisor Derr. | 01:02:19 | |
| I apologize I don't remember the number but like. | 01:02:23 | |
| Over 3/4 probably of our budget is mandated by the state of Wisconsin so that's why we don't do roads first. | 01:02:26 | |
| Because we have to provide jail services, should we cut 20% of that? We have Human Services. We're finally fully staffed. | 01:02:33 | |
| We're providing all kinds of required services. | 01:02:40 | |
| And in the statute, you know so many clients per social worker. | 01:02:44 | |
| And I mean, that's just required. | 01:02:48 | |
| It's across the board. | 01:02:50 | |
| So what are we going to cut the non mandated? We're going to cut all preventative? | 01:02:53 | |
| Care for families so that in 12 years it's just a gigantic cluster. Are we going to just completely stop taking care of our parks? | 01:02:58 | |
| The truth is the. | 01:03:08 | |
| Overwhelming majority of our budget is out of our control. | 01:03:09 | |
| It's mandated. | 01:03:13 | |
| By the state. | 01:03:14 | |
| Supervisor Guckenberger. | 01:03:17 | |
| Thank you, Mr. Chairman. | 01:03:20 | |
| Cameron, if you'd be so kind, just go to your budget CPI adjusted revenues. | 01:03:23 | |
| I mean, it was up there. It's that little chart that shows charges for services. | 01:03:27 | |
| This. | 01:03:33 | |
| I don't know, maybe go up 1? | 01:03:36 | |
| Chart Bar chart. | 01:03:38 | |
| Yes. What? Down, down 1? | 01:03:40 | |
| Right here. | 01:03:42 | |
| Yeah, OK. | 01:03:43 | |
| So I don't disagree that cutting. | 01:03:45 | |
| In these areas where we charge for services. | 01:03:50 | |
| Even based on your chart, you know where you said the dark green and we you know we can't cut because we generate. | 01:03:53 | |
| Revenue. | 01:03:58 | |
| But you do realize that there's just. | 01:03:59 | |
| Three main areas where we're generating all of our revenue and I'm not, I would never have to Cate. | 01:04:02 | |
| Cutting services in those areas. | 01:04:07 | |
| But we have a lot of other areas. | 01:04:10 | |
| In which we could cut services. | 01:04:13 | |
| Potentially, right? | 01:04:15 | |
| So, you know, I, I think it's disingenuous to say we can't cut. | 01:04:17 | |
| Because we're generating revenue. | 01:04:23 | |
| When I see, you know, clearly you know Clearview, I wouldn't advocate cutting staff there. We do generate revenue. | 01:04:25 | |
| I don't see the Sheriff's Office up there, at least it doesn't appear to be, unless that 4.6 million constitutes. | 01:04:32 | |
| The Sheriff's Office. | 01:04:38 | |
| OK. And Health and Human Services, I suspect most of those revenues or charges for services are coming from grants? | 01:04:39 | |
| Right. | 01:04:46 | |
| Because I don't believe we actually charge for services to the end user. | 01:04:47 | |
| But in those areas. | 01:04:51 | |
| I agree. | 01:04:54 | |
| There's there's no opportunity to cut. | 01:04:55 | |
| But that's only three departments out of, you know, 20 some departments in our organization. | 01:04:58 | |
| So. | 01:05:05 | |
| I don't think it's fair to come into this room and say that there's no place to cut. | 01:05:07 | |
| There's OK. | 01:05:13 | |
| Every. Every. | 01:05:15 | |
| Day by day progress. | 01:05:17 | |
| Personal enrichment, growth. We figure out things. This is true. | 01:05:18 | |
| And so there's always probably something that could be done, but what I'm telling you with resources I have right now. | 01:05:22 | |
| I I think that would be a. | 01:05:29 | |
| Poor choice when we're talking about those three large departments, those three large departments draw on. | 01:05:30 | |
| All of the services. | 01:05:35 | |
| Held in. | 01:05:37 | |
| General Administration. | 01:05:38 | |
| So when we're talking about what their charges for services and their function if we were to at the same vein talk about. | 01:05:40 | |
| Any reductions to general administration? | 01:05:46 | |
| We have to take into account the fact that that's going to reduce the quality of the service for which they're getting charged. | 01:05:49 | |
| They're charging and getting revenue. | 01:05:55 | |
| So there's there's, there's nothing is. | 01:05:57 | |
| Everything's tied together. | 01:06:01 | |
| So that's all I want to say about that. | 01:06:02 | |
| But. | 01:06:04 | |
| Well, yeah, I don't know. That was the last question for now. Go ahead. Please do. | 01:06:08 | |
| Just just one more point that that you probably don't it. It's not representative in this in this chart. | 01:06:14 | |
| But you can see in 20 and 21 that there's kind of a jump, right? | 01:06:20 | |
| If we looked at just the. | 01:06:25 | |
| You know the adjusted. | 01:06:27 | |
| That gives you the trend, that tells you that you had a change, you had a policy change in those years. | 01:06:29 | |
| And that policy change was capital improvements. | 01:06:36 | |
| It was investment in roads. | 01:06:39 | |
| And so. | 01:06:42 | |
| The the fact is is. | 01:06:43 | |
| Your revenue hasn't grown. | 01:06:44 | |
| Especially in. | 01:06:47 | |
| Terms of property tax. | 01:06:48 | |
| Hasn't grown to cover the expenses. | 01:06:49 | |
| And so now you're up against. | 01:06:52 | |
| You're you're, you're seeing the gap. | 01:06:54 | |
| You're feeling that gap and and it's real and I don't. | 01:06:56 | |
| I'm not trying to be disingenuous at all. This is. | 01:06:59 | |
| This is a real. | 01:07:03 | |
| Policy problem that you're you're needing to face. | 01:07:03 | |
| But I think that it's it's wise for us to see. | 01:07:07 | |
| The history and understand the history. | 01:07:10 | |
| And so in 2017 to 2020. | 01:07:13 | |
| You had a certain level of service. | 01:07:16 | |
| It was all operations. | 01:07:18 | |
| And then in 20 and 21. | 01:07:20 | |
| You decided, you know what, we want to start investing in more capital projects. | 01:07:22 | |
| Part of that was with ARPA. | 01:07:26 | |
| But part of it was just philosophy change too. I'm. | 01:07:28 | |
| I'm I wasn't here, but that's what I'm presuming I'm. | 01:07:31 | |
| Giving the benefit of the doubt that that was. | 01:07:35 | |
| That was the thought process. | 01:07:38 | |
| One other comment just on the 22 or changing your standard for 22 miles to let's say you upped it, you only replaced roads at 30 | 01:07:40 | |
| miles or every 30 years. | 01:07:46 | |
| They delta in that is $2,000,000. | 01:07:51 | |
| About. | 01:07:54 | |
| So instead of $10 million, you're now spending $8 million. | 01:07:56 | |
| But you still have an $8 million gap that you're going to need to cover. | 01:08:00 | |
| And so. | 01:08:04 | |
| Anyway. | 01:08:05 | |
| The 22 mile Rd. | 01:08:09 | |
| Actually is on a 25 year. | 01:08:11 | |
| Yes, thank you Basis. | 01:08:14 | |
| So you'd be cutting. | 01:08:16 | |
| You'd be going to 30 years from 25, correct? Sorry. | 01:08:18 | |
| Supervisor Supervisor Krause. | 01:08:22 | |
| So I. | 01:08:24 | |
| I'm not opposed to borrowing for some roads. | 01:08:25 | |
| I mean. | 01:08:28 | |
| We need to, we need to keep them up. | 01:08:29 | |
| Updated. | 01:08:31 | |
| The longer they go, the worse they're going to get. | 01:08:32 | |
| It's going to cost more to fix. | 01:08:34 | |
| We have inflation. | 01:08:36 | |
| And the ideas? | 01:08:38 | |
| And I respect everyone's opinions but the idea of cutting back and they do maybe 15 miles a road or. | 01:08:39 | |
| 10 miles a road a year will also affect their transportation aid. | 01:08:45 | |
| So if we're going to cut there, we're going to lose. | 01:08:49 | |
| Transportation aid also, so I think it's something else that we need to consider. | 01:08:51 | |
| Thank you. Thank you. | 01:08:54 | |
| OK, let's go ahead. | 01:08:57 | |
| All right, if there are no more questions for Ehlers, this is. | 01:09:00 | |
| Food for thought. | 01:09:04 | |
| And again. | 01:09:06 | |
| Talk more after. Thank you. | 01:09:08 | |
| Gentlemen. | 01:09:09 | |
| So. | 01:09:11 | |
| Borrowing dollars is one of the alternatives I want to go back to. | 01:09:12 | |
| Just share. | 01:09:18 | |
| From what was. | 01:09:19 | |
| Discussed tonight. | 01:09:20 | |
| OK, here we go. | 01:09:24 | |
| Trouble with the mouse. | 01:09:27 | |
| Maybe it push? | 01:09:32 | |
| Points to or relates to what? | 01:09:34 | |
| What Nathan was just sharing. | 01:09:37 | |
| But when you look at these. | 01:09:39 | |
| This. | 01:09:41 | |
| Arrangement of. | 01:09:42 | |
| Revenues and the percentages. | 01:09:44 | |
| Of the whole that each one is. | 01:09:47 | |
| When we're talking about cutting. | 01:09:50 | |
| We're talking about 22% of the overall. | 01:09:52 | |
| Our overall expense. | 01:09:56 | |
| $0.20 on the dollar is what we're talking about cutting. | 01:09:58 | |
| I know that. | 01:10:01 | |
| We're dealing with a little bit of an increase. | 01:10:03 | |
| If we talk about financing. | 01:10:05 | |
| Through borrowing dollars. | 01:10:08 | |
| But it's. | 01:10:10 | |
| No matter what. | 01:10:11 | |
| We do. | 01:10:12 | |
| We have to do something to cover that gap as. | 01:10:14 | |
| Mentioned. | 01:10:17 | |
| And. | 01:10:18 | |
| We're dealing with the percentage that will go up, but. | 01:10:20 | |
| Marginally. | 01:10:24 | |
| Compared to the other. | 01:10:25 | |
| To the other costs. | 01:10:27 | |
| I would expect. | 01:10:28 | |
| We'll have numbers we can provide more refined, A more refined presentation of what? | 01:10:29 | |
| The cost impact would be. | 01:10:34 | |
| And in later meetings, and I've taken some notes from what's been discussed today to make sure we do that. | 01:10:36 | |
| But to this point I guess. | 01:10:42 | |
| I would just move on to. | 01:10:44 | |
| Going back to. | 01:10:46 | |
| The presentation and moving on to the next part. | 01:10:48 | |
| And really? | 01:10:51 | |
| For the sake of time we've gone through. | 01:10:53 | |
| In the past and discussed. | 01:10:57 | |
| Where we're, where we're pulling dollars from. Maybe I'll just share it so we can see. Just a reminder of where dollars are coming | 01:10:59 | |
| from. | 01:11:02 | |
| To fund our priorities. | 01:11:06 | |
| OK, I'm not going to go through, but you can see the numbers there. | 01:11:07 | |
| And we talked about things that were unfunded. | 01:11:13 | |
| Mentioning again the roads Nathan rounded up. I'm rounding down. But the point is. | 01:11:17 | |
| That between 10 and 11,000,000 is what you're going to be looking at every every year if we continue the course we're on. | 01:11:22 | |
| For road construction and that's. | 01:11:28 | |
| Taking out of the. | 01:11:31 | |
| Mixture any. | 01:11:32 | |
| Savings from. | 01:11:33 | |
| An innovation that comes along or. | 01:11:35 | |
| A really good. | 01:11:38 | |
| Borrowing rate in the future and how that impacts the layers of. | 01:11:40 | |
| Of cost into the borrowing if there if we did one. | 01:11:44 | |
| But again. | 01:11:50 | |
| When we look at. | 01:11:51 | |
| Where we are. | 01:11:52 | |
| Compared to some other. | 01:11:53 | |
| Oh, excuse me. | 01:11:56 | |
| Before that slide. | 01:11:57 | |
| Look at where we are compared to our goals overall. | 01:11:58 | |
| For Dodge County. | 01:12:02 | |
| These are the I'm just. | 01:12:03 | |
| Coming back to the. | 01:12:04 | |
| The piece about. | 01:12:06 | |
| Excuse me? | 01:12:07 | |
| Our strategic plan or the strategic plan that you all worked on and approved? | 01:12:09 | |
| And set up. | 01:12:13 | |
| These are the areas of focus. | 01:12:15 | |
| And as. | 01:12:17 | |
| True to what's been talked about tonight, the highways are a big part of that. | 01:12:18 | |
| The roadways are huge. | 01:12:21 | |
| And we need to take care of them. I will say it was mentioned earlier, why don't we start and I. | 01:12:24 | |
| I know I don't want to listen. | 01:12:30 | |
| Supervisor Sigmund So. | 01:12:31 | |
| Doesn't always mean agreement, it just means under understanding. | 01:12:33 | |
| But I will tell you that. | 01:12:36 | |
| I would love to start. | 01:12:39 | |
| Like that in a budget process, but. | 01:12:41 | |
| It was mentioned I think Supervisor Derr and maybe others but. | 01:12:43 | |
| We don't have necessarily that luxury. | 01:12:47 | |
| Our dollar amount that we have to work with, there's lots of different dollars that have different restrictions. | 01:12:49 | |
| And as I mentioned already. | 01:12:55 | |
| With. | 01:12:57 | |
| Everything relates, so we could say roads, but. | 01:12:59 | |
| Then what we can do about? | 01:13:04 | |
| All these other costs that are tied to taking care of the people and or the other resources that are used to take care of those | 01:13:05 | |
| roads. | 01:13:09 | |
| So that's the pickle. | 01:13:13 | |
| With. | 01:13:14 | |
| With that is there's there's just a little bit more complication than. | 01:13:16 | |
| Then I'm sure it looks like. | 01:13:20 | |
| From from this end. | 01:13:22 | |
| So with that. | 01:13:23 | |
| I've written down a number of things from what's been shared in comments. | 01:13:26 | |
| That I would. I think most of that is. | 01:13:30 | |
| Information I. | 01:13:33 | |
| Can respond to in a communication if if needed. | 01:13:34 | |
| The one thing I will say about. | 01:13:39 | |
| Value and dollars. | 01:13:41 | |
| And is just. | 01:13:44 | |
| Open air for everyone is. | 01:13:46 | |
| How much did a? | 01:13:48 | |
| Bottle of Coca-Cola cost when you were a kid. | 01:13:49 | |
| And. | 01:13:54 | |
| We're not inflating or having trouble with performance or function. | 01:13:55 | |
| Anymore than Coca-Cola is. | 01:13:59 | |
| Today, yeah. | 01:14:01 | |
| But uh. | 01:14:02 | |
| I know that I pay more for a bottle of Coca-Cola today. | 01:14:03 | |
| Than I did with my dad as a little kid walking down the street to the gas station. | 01:14:06 | |
| And it's not because I'm in Wisconsin instead of Michigan. And it's not because Coca-Cola is less efficient. | 01:14:10 | |
| Or needs to cut something? | 01:14:16 | |
| It's because Coca-Cola costs more. | 01:14:18 | |
| That's all I'm going to say about that. | 01:14:21 | |
| So with that. | 01:14:23 | |
| Now we have the budget. | 01:14:25 | |
| And tada the book so. | 01:14:27 | |
| I've shared a bunch of information, I'm happy to answer any questions about that. | 01:14:31 | |
| But if you had questions about specifically the budget document. | 01:14:34 | |
| I know Supervisor Houchin also has. | 01:14:38 | |
| It takes and dedicates time to looking through the specific line item detail of the reports and we've talked and had a good | 01:14:41 | |
| conversation about that. I have that document I believe here available as well. | 01:14:47 | |
| So. | 01:14:53 | |
| Any what other questions do you all have about the budget? Are you going to address the ones that were sent in first or? | 01:14:55 | |
| So I can the only ones that. | 01:15:03 | |
| That I took time to. | 01:15:06 | |
| Address were the ones I sent in that e-mail on Saturday. | 01:15:08 | |
| So are you talking about those, Mr. Chair? OK. | 01:15:12 | |
| I know that. | 01:15:15 | |
| And thank you to those that have had questions and have called and talked with. | 01:15:16 | |
| Finance staff or others to get your answers. | 01:15:19 | |
| And thank you to the Finance and other staff and Human Services and elsewhere for answering those. | 01:15:22 | |
| So yes, how much do we charge private owners for the airport hangars to exist on airport land? | 01:15:28 | |
| I mentioned that finance team is looking into this or will be looking into this. | 01:15:34 | |
| To evaluate rent fees. | 01:15:38 | |
| I wonder if there's if I should turn anytime to Mackenzie or Nathan to talk about that. Do you have anything now that you would be | 01:15:40 | |
| prepared to share? It's OK if you don't. We can continue. | 01:15:45 | |
| Working on this. | 01:15:50 | |
| Nothing. The one thing I. | 01:15:55 | |
| One thing I can share is that the hangar. | 01:15:57 | |
| Contracts are 20. | 01:16:00 | |
| Leases. | 01:16:01 | |
| And so the ability to. | 01:16:02 | |
| To change them is somewhat limited, but moving forward that is something that. | 01:16:05 | |
| That, uh. | 01:16:09 | |
| The support the supervisors could could consider as a or. | 01:16:10 | |
| We can consider as a. | 01:16:14 | |
| A rental fee increase. | 01:16:16 | |
| Yeah. Thank you. | 01:16:18 | |
| Thank you. | 01:16:20 | |
| Supervisor Keel. | 01:16:22 | |
| I was just going to. | 01:16:24 | |
| Say that. | 01:16:26 | |
| The leases we had for airport hangars in my past. | 01:16:27 | |
| Work we. | 01:16:32 | |
| Had an escalator inflation. | 01:16:34 | |
| Amount in for like every five years or something. | 01:16:36 | |
| So I was just saying. | 01:16:40 | |
| To look around and see what others have. | 01:16:42 | |
| Thank you. | 01:16:46 | |
| Supervised game to Sandy. | 01:16:47 | |
| I think we pay $0.11 a square foot. | 01:16:50 | |
| Now it's been that way since 2022. | 01:16:53 | |
| I think we have 44. | 01:16:56 | |
| Leasable lots, I think we leased 40 of them. | 01:16:59 | |
| And it's like $3100 a year and it's like 70. | 01:17:02 | |
| $70 a year. | 01:17:06 | |
| Other other airports are. | 01:17:10 | |
| Waukesha is at $0.27 a square foot. | 01:17:15 | |
| I think Watertown was. | 01:17:19 | |
| Had gone up in there like 13 cents a square foot, but. | 01:17:23 | |
| They all varied and I think they. | 01:17:27 | |
| Figure in like a 3% increase of your. | 01:17:31 | |
| Supervisor Steger. | 01:17:36 | |
| Thank you, Mr. Chairman. | 01:17:38 | |
| 20 year lease on a hangar. | 01:17:41 | |
| I would assume that they do have an escalating. | 01:17:44 | |
| Fee each year or. | 01:17:48 | |
| Increase in cost. | 01:17:51 | |
| According to. | 01:17:52 | |
| Inflation. | 01:17:53 | |
| Or is it a 20 year lease at one set price? | 01:17:55 | |
| I can't speak to that. | 01:18:00 | |
| And I don't know if we have staff that can, but. | 01:18:01 | |
| Brian might be able to answer is gonna say. | 01:18:03 | |
| This is actually. | 01:18:06 | |
| The last. | 01:18:07 | |
| The last? Well, no. | 01:18:08 | |
| We have the public hearing on the 30th. | 01:18:09 | |
| But otherwise, the last time you'll have the privilege here and from our highway commissioner, so. | 01:18:12 | |
| Brian, can you add, thank you insight on the insight on this? Yeah, the the releases were re. | 01:18:16 | |
| Reevaluated in 2022 by the Highway Committee. | 01:18:22 | |
| Rents were reviewed. | 01:18:26 | |
| With like airports. | 01:18:28 | |
| And we were found to what we said it at was a little higher than the average. | 01:18:30 | |
| Hadn't been visited in a while. Some of the differences in hangar lease costs are. | 01:18:34 | |
| What do you offer as an airport? | 01:18:40 | |
| If you compare to Waukesha or Watertown and they have sewer and water service to their hangar lots significant difference from | 01:18:42 | |
| what Juno has to offer. | 01:18:47 | |
| So I think if you want to compare. | 01:18:51 | |
| Lot lease rates. | 01:18:54 | |
| You need to compare to like airports. | 01:18:56 | |
| We're in the ballpark. It can be adjusted. It's a 20 year lease, but. | 01:19:00 | |
| There is an opportunity to adjust rates as necessary. | 01:19:04 | |
| Throughout the course of that 20 years. | 01:19:07 | |
| And I think that can be done, but it shouldn't be done. | 01:19:09 | |
| Arbitrarily, it has to be done with some. | 01:19:12 | |
| A logical, fair approach. | 01:19:15 | |
| And there are more than. | 01:19:17 | |
| 15. | 01:19:20 | |
| Hanger lots available today so we're not saturated with tenants and. | 01:19:21 | |
| And. | 01:19:25 | |
| I think for today it's probably in a good place, but could we revisit it? | 01:19:27 | |
| In a year or two for a. | 01:19:31 | |
| Potential rate increase. | 01:19:32 | |
| At any rate, that's not a big revenue generator. Never will be. | 01:19:34 | |
| They're 3 to $700.00 a lot. | 01:19:38 | |
| I think it's important to understand that the county leases the. | 01:19:43 | |
| The the ground, they don't lease the building. The building is owned by the individual and they're so sold and and exchanged on a | 01:19:46 | |
| regular basis. | 01:19:50 | |
| But it's never going to be a great revenue generator. The egg land generates more. Obviously you visited that month or so ago. | 01:19:55 | |
| I made some adjustments there. | 01:20:03 | |
| There is an opportunity, I think for more growth at the airport with some. | 01:20:05 | |
| Business potential. | 01:20:10 | |
| There's several. | 01:20:12 | |
| People right now talking to me about. | 01:20:13 | |
| Wanting to develop business hangars out there. | 01:20:16 | |
| Could be a different rate. Of course they want sewer and water, that's got to be considered. | 01:20:18 | |
| That's going to take some heavy lifting on someone's part to recognize. | 01:20:22 | |
| What it might take to have sewer and water on some commercial. | 01:20:26 | |
| Hanger lots, maybe in the front of the field instead of the rear of field. | 01:20:29 | |
| I've recently learned that. | 01:20:33 | |
| All the airports in the area are. | 01:20:35 | |
| They're built out. | 01:20:38 | |
| So suddenly Joan was becoming more attractive. | 01:20:39 | |
| You you may see some real growth in your airport. | 01:20:43 | |
| The next 5 to 10 years, if you are fair minded and aggressive, you might actually see. | 01:20:45 | |
| Some some more benefit to having that airfield out there than you have in the past. | 01:20:51 | |
| Thank you. | 01:20:57 | |
| Thank you, Brian. | 01:20:58 | |
| That's it for now. | 01:21:02 | |
| All right. So I'll continue down the just going over some of these questions. So what new positions were added in 2026? | 01:21:05 | |
| I in my. | 01:21:13 | |
| Message directed everybody to the back pages, so the back pages of the of the document you received. | 01:21:15 | |
| And for those that received it, some of you may have received one with some loose pages. | 01:21:21 | |
| So. | 01:21:26 | |
| The loose pages are. | 01:21:27 | |
| We we found a few things and so we made. | 01:21:29 | |
| They're they're not substantial, but they were. | 01:21:32 | |
| Corrections that were made to the documents, so the loose pages are what you have there. | 01:21:35 | |
| And on the back page of that report. | 01:21:39 | |
| The very last page of that report. | 01:21:41 | |
| Is meant to at a table. | 01:21:44 | |
| Show uh. | 01:21:46 | |
| What's been changed? | 01:21:48 | |
| In terms of. | 01:21:49 | |
| And and the challenge? | 01:21:50 | |
| We're still working on making improvements to the kind of report we might be able to pull out of our. | 01:21:53 | |
| UKG. | 01:21:59 | |
| HRI is system. | 01:22:01 | |
| But it's been, it's been sometimes it is sometimes a challenge. | 01:22:04 | |
| So thankfully for finance folks, you've got the Fte's there listed. | 01:22:08 | |
| That doesn't always. | 01:22:14 | |
| Directly reflect positions, but a lot of times it does. | 01:22:15 | |
| But that's the information that shows what we have for positions. So in talking through what the positions are, I'll just just | 01:22:19 | |
| overview. | 01:22:22 | |
| Numbers we had. | 01:22:27 | |
| As I went through and reviewed. | 01:22:29 | |
| And then confirmed with finance. | 01:22:31 | |
| 17.3. | 01:22:34 | |
| New full-time equivalent. | 01:22:36 | |
| Equivalence. | 01:22:39 | |
| In terms of. | 01:22:40 | |
| Of positions. | 01:22:41 | |
| We have reduced. | 01:22:42 | |
| Or eliminated. | 01:22:44 | |
| 20.45 full-time equivalents. | 01:22:45 | |
| And total non pool meaning those that. | 01:22:48 | |
| Are actually filling a position. | 01:22:52 | |
| Whether it be somebody that's working. | 01:22:54 | |
| 10 hours a week or someone that's working full time. | 01:22:56 | |
| But non pool full-time equivalents. | 01:23:00 | |
| Are 929.66 so to the question earlier that number. | 01:23:03 | |
| Or my. | 01:23:08 | |
| Getting a number versus providing an estimate or recalling. | 01:23:09 | |
| A very general number. Sometimes that has changed. | 01:23:14 | |
| But that number does change and fluctuate as people come in or people leave. | 01:23:17 | |
| But the estimated or anticipated budgeted space. | 01:23:20 | |
| Is 9 point. | 01:23:24 | |
| Or 929.66 full-time equivalents. | 01:23:25 | |
| Pool positions are a little bit different. We have a specific set of hours for those positions and. | 01:23:29 | |
| Every department that has pool positions. | 01:23:34 | |
| They can hire. | 01:23:37 | |
| 100 people for. | 01:23:39 | |
| Each one 4.1 hour if they wanted to. It's it's not really relevant for us. | 01:23:42 | |
| Just as long as the. | 01:23:47 | |
| Total hour amount. | 01:23:48 | |
| Stays the same. So we have a rate of paper, those positions, we have the hours, we know that. | 01:23:50 | |
| We need to fill. | 01:23:54 | |
| And then our departments fill those. So that would be. | 01:23:55 | |
| A big one is is court, but there are also in the Sheriff's Office, there are Human Services and health. | 01:23:59 | |
| And and clear. | 01:24:04 | |
| There are positions like that. | 01:24:06 | |
| So. | 01:24:08 | |
| And other places that I'm. | 01:24:09 | |
| Probably that I'm forgetting. | 01:24:10 | |
| But that was the answer to that question. | 01:24:13 | |
| So. | 01:24:15 | |
| Next is. | 01:24:16 | |
| Here we interest. | 01:24:19 | |
| A question was the art of interest, I believe, right? Yes, yes. | 01:24:21 | |
| So the ARPA interest, I apologize. | 01:24:25 | |
| In my. | 01:24:27 | |
| In my document. | 01:24:28 | |
| Finance. They provided me with a number, I just forgot to include it before I sent it out. So the ARPA interest total right now is | 01:24:31 | |
| $1,069,827. | 01:24:36 | |
| If anybody wants to write that down, I can also resend this with that number in it. | 01:24:41 | |
| But again, yes, so it's. | 01:24:46 | |
| 1,000,000. | 01:24:47 | |
| 69,000. | 01:24:50 | |
| 800. | 01:24:53 | |
| $27. | 01:24:55 | |
| So that is the interest that's been earned. | 01:24:58 | |
| On. | 01:25:01 | |
| On ARPA dollars and that interest. | 01:25:02 | |
| Believe many of you know, but just to. | 01:25:04 | |
| Restate if you don't. | 01:25:06 | |
| So those dollars are not tied. | 01:25:08 | |
| To any of the federal regulations associated with the ARPA program. | 01:25:11 | |
| Those dollars are dollars that. | 01:25:15 | |
| As interest earned. | 01:25:17 | |
| Belong to Dodge County. | 01:25:19 | |
| So we have not directly said we're going to use that 1,069,827. | 01:25:23 | |
| It's not right, it's not singled out as a specific, it's in the balance of funds. | 01:25:28 | |
| So. | 01:25:34 | |
| When you look at fund balances and things like that. | 01:25:34 | |
| It's in there, but it's not pulled out or parsed out. | 01:25:37 | |
| So I think and I know in fact a couple supervisors have talked with me. | 01:25:40 | |
| About those dollars and applying those dollars and we could just as easily state with just apply. | 01:25:45 | |
| $1,069,827.00 of. | 01:25:52 | |
| Fund balance. | 01:25:55 | |
| That's what we would essentially be doing, whether we call it the interest or not, that's where those dollars they sit in the | 01:25:57 | |
| overall. | 01:26:00 | |
| Added together bucket. | 01:26:03 | |
| Does that make sense? Am I speaking out of school? | 01:26:05 | |
| Finance. | 01:26:07 | |
| Folks, OK. | 01:26:08 | |
| The next one did we set aside dollars in the Community Development Fund? We did. | 01:26:11 | |
| So we have about. | 01:26:16 | |
| Oh gosh, I want to say it was like 42. | 01:26:17 | |
| 1000. | 01:26:19 | |
| Something. | 01:26:20 | |
| That is remaining we we actually through. | 01:26:22 | |
| The application process and then the work of the advisory. | 01:26:25 | |
| Committee and then the Executive Committee, we've allocated over $1.9 million of the 2 million. | 01:26:30 | |
| To projects. | 01:26:35 | |
| I can get your figures on the number of housing units over all that would be. | 01:26:37 | |
| Coming of the. | 01:26:41 | |
| The proposals. | 01:26:42 | |
| But they're they're very positive. | 01:26:44 | |
| Projects for Dodge County. | 01:26:46 | |
| But we didn't exhaust. | 01:26:49 | |
| Exactly and completely 2 million. So whatever that balances would roll over and then we did plan for a $2,000,000 allocation. | 01:26:50 | |
| So there is $2,000,000 set aside for next year. | 01:26:58 | |
| And then? | 01:27:02 | |
| Where department requests included or rejected in the budget, I've kind of gone through. | 01:27:04 | |
| Thread already so. | 01:27:09 | |
| That was that were the that were. | 01:27:10 | |
| Those were the questions. | 01:27:13 | |
| Any follow up or? | 01:27:15 | |
| Something that. | 01:27:17 | |
| Missed that you? | 01:27:19 | |
| Wanted to know about and maybe you called or sent an e-mail and it hasn't been addressed. | 01:27:21 | |
| We can try to take care of that tonight. | 01:27:26 | |
| Supervisor Sigmund. | 01:27:31 | |
| Thank you. Could you just explain? I think I read about some leftover. | 01:27:33 | |
| Sales tax from 2024 is that. | 01:27:37 | |
| In there what? | 01:27:41 | |
| Could you just explain how that all? | 01:27:42 | |
| Is work work so? | 01:27:44 | |
| Thank you. So that I'm thinking that you're looking at the letter. | 01:27:45 | |
| Rate, Rate that front letter. | 01:27:50 | |
| Yep, so. | 01:27:52 | |
| That. | 01:27:54 | |
| That sales tax fund balance that. | 01:27:56 | |
| I believe should be 2025. | 01:27:58 | |
| And that's just an error on my part. | 01:28:01 | |
| I have it crossed out on here. | 01:28:04 | |
| So what page? | 01:28:06 | |
| I'm looking at page five of the budget document. | 01:28:07 | |
| And it's right in the first paragraph. | 01:28:12 | |
| 2nd to last complete line. | 01:28:15 | |
| And yes, it says the remaining in the 20. | 01:28:17 | |
| For debt payments? | 01:28:20 | |
| And the sentence of the 6.4 million remaining. | 01:28:22 | |
| In the 2024 sales tax fund balance, that's 2020. | 01:28:26 | |
| So thank you. | 01:28:29 | |
| So just to be clear. | 01:28:33 | |
| Just to be clear, it's. | 01:28:36 | |
| What's remaining in 2025 is a 3.9. | 01:28:38 | |
| Yes, that's what we're rejecting. | 01:28:42 | |
| Correct. | 01:28:45 | |
| Thank you. | 01:28:46 | |
| So when we're talking about the 6.457, I think that was. | 01:28:47 | |
| That was to date remaining. | 01:28:51 | |
| Oh, with an expectation, right, that we're going to apply? | 01:28:53 | |
| Additional fund balance, so will be two 2 million at the end. | 01:28:57 | |
| Yes. | 01:29:00 | |
| Thank you. | 01:29:01 | |
| 2.3. | 01:29:02 | |
| Supervisor Teal. | 01:29:04 | |
| Keel. | 01:29:08 | |
| I think a summary. | 01:29:11 | |
| I haven't asked for this. | 01:29:13 | |
| Before but. | 01:29:14 | |
| I think. | 01:29:16 | |
| A summary where you show maybe? | 01:29:18 | |
| Sales tax. | 01:29:21 | |
| Applied in the budget? Something that brings it all together, yes. | 01:29:23 | |
| I can see it. | 01:29:27 | |
| Say on. | 01:29:29 | |
| Pages 12. | 01:29:32 | |
| 13 where you show total revenues, but maybe. | 01:29:34 | |
| Something that shows projects. | 01:29:38 | |
| And what it has applied to. | 01:29:40 | |
| Thank you. Yeah. | 01:29:42 | |
| Both for. | 01:29:44 | |
| Safe for the current year. | 01:29:45 | |
| And for next year? | 01:29:47 | |
| And how many roads? | 01:29:48 | |
| Miles, this is. | 01:29:50 | |
| Anticipated at this point. | 01:29:52 | |
| To cover. | 01:29:55 | |
| I think that would be good and maybe. | 01:29:57 | |
| When you look at highways. | 01:30:00 | |
| Look at some history and see. | 01:30:03 | |
| What have we done for a few years and how did we fund it and how many roads have we done? | 01:30:06 | |
| Give us some history. | 01:30:13 | |
| Of how did you fund it? Sales tax? ARPA. | 01:30:16 | |
| Levy grants. | 01:30:20 | |
| You know, funding local. | 01:30:22 | |
| Chip money. | 01:30:25 | |
| Local Rd. assistance funds, whatever it was, but how? | 01:30:27 | |
| Have we? | 01:30:31 | |
| Progressed over the last. | 01:30:32 | |
| Five years. | 01:30:34 | |
| 10 years, whatever. | 01:30:36 | |
| Is feasible. | 01:30:38 | |
| Might give you. | 01:30:40 | |
| A history to say. | 01:30:42 | |
| Here's what we've done in. | 01:30:44 | |
| We did. | 01:30:46 | |
| 5 miles for. | 01:30:47 | |
| 10 million. | 01:30:50 | |
| Or 5 million and now that 5 miles is going to be 10 million. | 01:30:51 | |
| It just to show the progression. | 01:30:57 | |
| Yeah. Thank you. | 01:30:59 | |
| We can do that and the good news is when we approach the budget this year. | 01:31:02 | |
| We approached it and provided you with. | 01:31:06 | |
| Substantial completion, but not completion. | 01:31:09 | |
| So that we could. | 01:31:12 | |
| Make improvement. So we could probably still add something to this budget for the final. | 01:31:13 | |
| But I appreciate it. | 01:31:17 | |
| Thank you. | 01:31:18 | |
| Go ahead. | 01:31:20 | |
| That's it, That's it. | 01:31:21 | |
| Well, Mr. Chair, if that's it, I do not have. | 01:31:24 | |
| Other. | 01:31:26 | |
| Highlights to. | 01:31:28 | |
| To bring up at this time. | 01:31:29 | |
| I'm looking back at department directors. | 01:31:31 | |
| See if anybody's brains. | 01:31:34 | |
| Gears are turning. They want to share something new. | 01:31:36 | |
| I think anymore specific questions, Supervisor Keel. | 01:31:38 | |
| Her revenue, I just wanted to ask. | 01:31:44 | |
| When you said 500,000 was added to Wimker. | 01:31:48 | |
| To make it what? | 01:31:53 | |
| So 800,000. | 01:31:55 | |
| Ah OK. I can't answer that right now because at one point I believe. | 01:31:58 | |
| 300,000 in previous budget and she's getting out of that one plugged in you're going to. | 01:32:02 | |
| So so last year budgeted. | 01:32:11 | |
| 1.3 So we added or sorry, this year we budgeted 1.3 but we added 500 to be 1.8. | 01:32:14 | |
| We this year we budgeted 500 and now next year it's 1.8. | 01:32:21 | |
| Sorry. | 01:32:26 | |
| 500 last year, 1.8 this year. | 01:32:27 | |
| Yeah, correct. | 01:32:35 | |
| What? What was the? | 01:32:38 | |
| Well, and that's probably also how I. | 01:32:40 | |
| Wrote it and said it. So we can clarify that. So what was submitted by the department's what what was submitted originally by the | 01:32:42 | |
| department was the 1.3. We changed it to 1.8. So as an additional 500,000. So it's the yes, it was the, it was the adding in. | 01:32:50 | |
| Anticipated revenues. | 01:32:58 | |
| That we have. | 01:33:00 | |
| Deliberately not added in in the past. | 01:33:01 | |
| So that we. | 01:33:03 | |
| And if it doesn't show up? | 01:33:05 | |
| We're not out 1.8 million. | 01:33:07 | |
| In terms of revenues, we're out. | 01:33:09 | |
| Less than that, last year we only budgeted 500,000. | 01:33:11 | |
| So if we got. | 01:33:14 | |
| 500,000 Great if we got more win. | 01:33:16 | |
| And if we got less, we were only out 500,000. | 01:33:19 | |
| I guess what's the point of mentioning it, right? | 01:33:22 | |
| Yes, ma'am. | 01:33:26 | |
| Which is also the three-year average. | 01:33:29 | |
| We based it on a historical average. | 01:33:31 | |
| OK. Any other specific questions? | 01:33:36 | |
| All right, Kathy. Supervisor Houchin. | 01:33:44 | |
| Thank you. | 01:33:46 | |
| There's some things as I go through the budget. | 01:33:47 | |
| I have a problem. | 01:33:49 | |
| With borrowing money. | 01:33:51 | |
| For roads at the same time, we're giving away $2,000,000 in grants. | 01:33:54 | |
| To me that doesn't make sense if we don't have the money to give and we've only done it for one year. | 01:33:59 | |
| Given those grants. | 01:34:04 | |
| Maybe we take a little break, see how the. | 01:34:06 | |
| How the investment? | 01:34:09 | |
| Worked. | 01:34:10 | |
| Do we even have benchmarks on those investments? | 01:34:11 | |
| Are there benchmarks? | 01:34:15 | |
| So yes, I, I will say yes, we have built into our contracts. | 01:34:16 | |
| Timelines and requirements. | 01:34:22 | |
| So. | 01:34:23 | |
| When these entities apply, they give us. | 01:34:24 | |
| A projection of. | 01:34:27 | |
| How long they think their their project is going to take and what is going to yield? | 01:34:28 | |
| And we want we hold them to a specific timeline. I believe there may be additional details. I'm looking toward corporation counsel | 01:34:32 | |
| because she's been. | 01:34:35 | |
| An integral part of drafting those. | 01:34:39 | |
| But we told them to it. And if they don't? | 01:34:42 | |
| Come in within the time frame to get reimbursed because they can show us the deliverable. | 01:34:45 | |
| Than those dollars don't get. | 01:34:51 | |
| Distributed. | 01:34:52 | |
| But at the same time, some of our tips are. | 01:34:55 | |
| And they might not payout. | 01:34:59 | |
| We might not see the. | 01:35:01 | |
| The value of that for. | 01:35:03 | |
| 5-10 years. | 01:35:05 | |
| Not yeah. | 01:35:07 | |
| Not in property tax, correct? | 01:35:08 | |
| And so I think. | 01:35:10 | |
| To borrow money when we're getting. | 01:35:14 | |
| I know you, I know it. It always feels good to be a funny away. | 01:35:17 | |
| If we don't have it, we. | 01:35:26 | |
| I see. | 01:35:30 | |
| What you're saying? | 01:35:30 | |
| Our to. | 01:35:38 | |
| Thank you. | 01:35:42 | |
| One thing that I will if I can. | 01:35:43 | |
| Go ahead. | 01:35:46 | |
| Just a couple thoughts because I appreciate Kathy to comment. We've talked about this one already a little bit. | 01:35:47 | |
| And. | 01:35:53 | |
| Yes. | 01:35:53 | |
| With with tax increment financing districts, we're not going to see. | 01:35:54 | |
| That return in property tax value. | 01:35:58 | |
| A base value increase for. | 01:36:01 | |
| Depends on which district, right? But the potential is always 20 or 27 years. That's the the time frame depending on which type of | 01:36:04 | |
| tax increment district it is. | 01:36:09 | |
| But if we get the development in that district. | 01:36:13 | |
| It yields a lot of other fruit. | 01:36:17 | |
| For us. | 01:36:19 | |
| So. | 01:36:20 | |
| The benefit of the people moving in and investing, whether they be people that end up contributing to bodies like this in their. | 01:36:21 | |
| Locale have kids that are going to school. | 01:36:28 | |
| That gets more money from the state for our school districts, so or. | 01:36:31 | |
| From us. From us too, I guess. | 01:36:35 | |
| As residents. But you're growing. You're growing the base of. | 01:36:37 | |
| I guess assets and resources. | 01:36:42 | |
| Even though you're not seeing the specific. | 01:36:44 | |
| Revenue set of property tax over that same time period, it's difficult to measure. | 01:36:47 | |
| That's why property tax is what we measure. | 01:36:53 | |
| But there are other, there are other value adds, excuse me, to the community or to the county as a whole of having it. | 01:36:55 | |
| So I would just want to share that. | 01:37:01 | |
| That thought before. | 01:37:04 | |
| Yeah, before the the opportunity. | 01:37:06 | |
| Goes away. | 01:37:09 | |
| So thank you. | 01:37:10 | |
| Supervisor. | 01:37:10 | |
| I was going to say something similar. This is not giving. | 01:37:12 | |
| This is not going to Saint Vinnie's, this is an investment in our community. | 01:37:15 | |
| And I know one of our supervisors just talked about our stagnating population. | 01:37:20 | |
| You know. | 01:37:24 | |
| I grew up here. | 01:37:25 | |
| And. | 01:37:26 | |
| We are. | 01:37:27 | |
| Within 2000. | 01:37:27 | |
| People City Beaver Dam. | 01:37:29 | |
| Since I. | 01:37:31 | |
| Came here in grade school. | 01:37:32 | |
| So. | 01:37:33 | |
| Yeah, it's stagnated. So when you invest in housing. | 01:37:35 | |
| You attract. | 01:37:39 | |
| Pill from out. | 01:37:41 | |
| I don't know where we're talking about cutting 10% of the workforce. Clearview's got a terrific shortage. | 01:37:43 | |
| Of workers and we're putting in a multi $1,000,000 project. | 01:37:48 | |
| Maybe not horrific, but we have a shortage. | 01:37:52 | |
| And we're putting this multi. | 01:37:54 | |
| $1,000,000 expansion and if we don't even have people right. | 01:37:56 | |
| It's we've got to fill it. | 01:37:59 | |
| Right. And if we can't fill it with staff, then we can't fill it with patients. So like cutting Clearview? | 01:38:02 | |
| Would not be a great idea. | 01:38:07 | |
| But similarly, not investing in the community looks good on paper. | 01:38:09 | |
| But. | 01:38:15 | |
| Wouldn't it be amazing? | 01:38:16 | |
| If when the younger people here are older and they look back and go wow, look at how everything is going so well and businesses | 01:38:18 | |
| are thriving and our population is up. | 01:38:23 | |
| And we did that because we invested in the community. | 01:38:28 | |
| So it's not just a gift. | 01:38:32 | |
| And there's also a huge housing shortage. So if these are housing developments. | 01:38:35 | |
| That's critical. | 01:38:40 | |
| You don't have enough housing. How are we going to grow? | 01:38:41 | |
| The community. | 01:38:44 | |
| Any other comments? | 01:38:50 | |
| I have one more, Mr. Chair, if I could. | 01:38:54 | |
| Just. | 01:38:56 | |
| Wanted to mention. | 01:38:58 | |
| For those of you and. | 01:38:59 | |
| I would appreciate and understand and expect that. | 01:39:01 | |
| Nearly everyone or everyone. | 01:39:04 | |
| Looking hard at what we are doing in terms of operations and how that relates to what we might be. | 01:39:06 | |
| Asking our residents to pay in some other form of. | 01:39:12 | |
| Of added property tax in coming years. | 01:39:15 | |
| We are one thing. | 01:39:20 | |
| That will be significant overtime. | 01:39:22 | |
| We are coaching all of our departments. | 01:39:25 | |
| So that when we are talking about all of the capital, things were not. | 01:39:28 | |
| Debating tonight or discussing tonight? | 01:39:32 | |
| But the the vehicles or. | 01:39:34 | |
| New lighting. | 01:39:37 | |
| In a facility. | 01:39:39 | |
| Air conditioner on top of the building, whatever those things might be. | 01:39:41 | |
| As we. | 01:39:45 | |
| Build those out. | 01:39:46 | |
| We are coaching and requiring proof. | 01:39:48 | |
| Of budgeting for the long term replacement of that item. | 01:39:51 | |
| In the future. | 01:39:55 | |
| So. | 01:39:56 | |
| Understanding just a point about conservative. | 01:39:58 | |
| Budgeting. | 01:40:01 | |
| We're not asked. People aren't coming and asking for something now and then not planning for how they're going to pay for it | 01:40:02 | |
| later. | 01:40:05 | |
| When they have to come ask again. | 01:40:09 | |
| We're we're looking for and requiring folks to set aside dollars and. | 01:40:11 | |
| To the extent. | 01:40:17 | |
| A lot of it this year didn't didn't show up because we still said no to the requests. | 01:40:18 | |
| But in the future. | 01:40:22 | |
| There's. | 01:40:23 | |
| There's other. | 01:40:25 | |
| Value adds that we're working on trying to reduce. | 01:40:26 | |
| Our our overhead cost or at least our. | 01:40:30 | |
| Long term. | 01:40:33 | |
| Surprise impact planning for the future with operations, maintenance and replacement. | 01:40:34 | |
| Thank you. | 01:40:41 | |
| And that is all that I have, Mr. Chair, so. | 01:40:42 | |
| OK. | 01:40:45 | |
| What do we have on the desk tonight? | 01:40:49 | |
| On your desks you have an e-mail. | 01:40:52 | |
| From the county administrator with the questions and you also have an outline of the meetings and the deadlines for budget | 01:40:55 | |
| amendments. | 01:41:00 | |
| Provided by my office as a reminder for you. | 01:41:05 | |
| Thank you. | 01:41:09 | |
| Supervisor Johnson. | 01:41:12 | |
| OK, I make a motion to adjourn to our the next meeting this Thursday, October 30th at 6:00 PM. | 01:41:14 | |
| I have a second by Supervisor Miller. | 01:41:21 | |
| All in favor signify by aye. | 01:41:23 | |
| Opposed. That is carried. | 01:41:26 |
* use Ctrl+F (Cmd+F on Mac) to search in document
Loading...
Document list
| Document Name | Document type | |
|---|---|---|
| October 28 2025 Proceedings | General Document |
* use Ctrl+F (Cmd+F on Mac) to search in document
Loading...
Transcript
| Well. | 00:00:00 | |
| Department directors. | 00:00:01 | |
| Who joined us tonight? | 00:00:02 | |
| I want to and also representatives from Ellers and associates that will be talking with us in a few minutes about. | 00:00:04 | |
| Financing. | 00:00:11 | |
| And the financing opportunities? | 00:00:12 | |
| For Dodge County and what the impact would be. | 00:00:14 | |
| If we were to pursue such a thing in the future, but before we go the go to their presentation, I wanted to give a brief overview | 00:00:16 | |
| of some of the material that was distributed. | 00:00:22 | |
| Via e-mail to your emails on Saturday morning. | 00:00:27 | |
| So first and foremost, just to confirm with everyone, we. | 00:00:32 | |
| We have a before you and what you received last week is a balanced budget. | 00:00:35 | |
| We have about $71.9 million in overall budget for general fund. | 00:00:40 | |
| Fund 100. | 00:00:46 | |
| And then all funds you'll notice down a little further down below 183,000,000. | 00:00:48 | |
| $782,824. | 00:00:53 | |
| The adjusted number there is meant to show operational costs when we take out. | 00:00:57 | |
| Transfers between funds because that inflates the number and when we take out internal service. | 00:01:01 | |
| Costs. | 00:01:07 | |
| Because that also inflates, inflates the net. | 00:01:07 | |
| Amount. | 00:01:10 | |
| And then overall property tax? | 00:01:12 | |
| At UH. | 00:01:14 | |
| 37.1. | 00:01:15 | |
| Million. | 00:01:16 | |
| For 2026. | 00:01:18 | |
| I have some. | 00:01:21 | |
| Some information that is interesting that I would love to work have more interactive a discussion on, but we'll do that near the. | 00:01:22 | |
| Latter end of the meeting. | 00:01:29 | |
| But comparison for Dodge County versus the other 71 counties in the state of. | 00:01:30 | |
| Wisconsin. | 00:01:36 | |
| So this is just we, we talked about this previously, but a reminder there, we have two lines. | 00:01:37 | |
| Demonstrating for US operating and capital expenses specifically. | 00:01:42 | |
| The blue one. | 00:01:47 | |
| Is actual. | 00:01:48 | |
| In actual dollars and the orange is when we take. | 00:01:49 | |
| This year's dollars. | 00:01:53 | |
| 2025. | 00:01:54 | |
| And review or. | 00:01:55 | |
| 25 and 26, but go backward. | 00:01:57 | |
| And look at OK. | 00:01:59 | |
| Purchasing power of dollars today. | 00:02:01 | |
| And equivalent value today. | 00:02:03 | |
| In 2012. | 00:02:06 | |
| 2017 What would that look like? | 00:02:07 | |
| And when you do that? | 00:02:09 | |
| You can see that the. | 00:02:11 | |
| The increase is much less dramatic than it might sound when we look at. | 00:02:12 | |
| Dollar for dollar actuals. | 00:02:19 | |
| In in 2025 looking back. | 00:02:20 | |
| Like we have with the blue line. | 00:02:24 | |
| If that makes sense. | 00:02:26 | |
| Property tax over time. | 00:02:28 | |
| In the same form, so taking the number this year and then projecting that backward to look at what our costs were like over the | 00:02:30 | |
| last 10 years. | 00:02:34 | |
| Excuse me? | 00:02:38 | |
| We have actually reduced overtime. | 00:02:39 | |
| What we are spending out of our. | 00:02:43 | |
| Residents pockets are businesses coffers. | 00:02:47 | |
| On property taxes or on property tax funded services in Dodge County. | 00:02:50 | |
| That has gone down. | 00:02:55 | |
| So. | 00:02:56 | |
| I'll show. | 00:02:57 | |
| Some more direct. | 00:02:58 | |
| Detail those numbers. | 00:03:00 | |
| In a coming slide. | 00:03:02 | |
| But then we also look at median homeowner property tax. Now the slides you received on Saturday, there was a bit of a. | 00:03:04 | |
| An error or something that would be confusing, it said. I think median homeowner $300,000. | 00:03:11 | |
| Property tax. | 00:03:17 | |
| So a median home of 300,000 but we've. | 00:03:19 | |
| Assessed or taken a look at the median home. | 00:03:21 | |
| Across time. | 00:03:24 | |
| But you can see there too the median homeowner. | 00:03:26 | |
| Overtime has been paying. | 00:03:29 | |
| Less. | 00:03:30 | |
| Per $1000 or overall? Excuse me? | 00:03:31 | |
| Property tax dollars. | 00:03:34 | |
| When we look at revenues historically. | 00:03:37 | |
| Dodge County. | 00:03:40 | |
| Has. | 00:03:41 | |
| Really. You'll see there. | 00:03:42 | |
| Four major revenues, the blue line or the blue? | 00:03:44 | |
| Chunk of the bar is our property taxes. | 00:03:47 | |
| The yellow chunk of the bar sales tax. | 00:03:50 | |
| Light green is charges for service and. | 00:03:53 | |
| Dark green is. | 00:03:55 | |
| You'll notice that the blue line or the blue bar. | 00:03:57 | |
| Doesn't change much. | 00:04:00 | |
| Over time. | 00:04:02 | |
| And that's because as we look at what we're charging. | 00:04:03 | |
| In property tax. | 00:04:07 | |
| It's remained fairly consistent. | 00:04:09 | |
| It has gone up. What you don't have here is an adjusted version, but I've looked at that and that. | 00:04:11 | |
| Shows that. | 00:04:18 | |
| That amount even more closely aligning or even. | 00:04:19 | |
| As we mentioned in the other slides going down but the. | 00:04:22 | |
| You'll see sales tax as well has increased slightly. | 00:04:25 | |
| But the significant change? | 00:04:28 | |
| Overtime has been charges for service. | 00:04:30 | |
| So as we have grown as an organization or as we've maybe not even grown as an organization, probably better to say as we have. | 00:04:33 | |
| Every year, year by year. | 00:04:41 | |
| We go through this process and we look to reduce or keep the same or as. | 00:04:43 | |
| As reined in as possible our property taxes. | 00:04:49 | |
| We've looked to other. | 00:04:52 | |
| Other things for covering. | 00:04:53 | |
| Covering costs and that's charges for service now in there of course is also Clearview. | 00:04:56 | |
| Which funds its whole operation through its charges for service. But other things have increased as well in terms of charges for | 00:05:01 | |
| service. That's how that's the big. | 00:05:06 | |
| Significant change. | 00:05:11 | |
| That has helped us. | 00:05:12 | |
| To survive and navigate. | 00:05:14 | |
| With a fairly consistent property tax amount. | 00:05:16 | |
| Overtime. | 00:05:19 | |
| Also, you'll see grants have gone up, but not significantly. In fact, they've dropped a little bit in the last. | 00:05:20 | |
| Well, for 2026 we project. | 00:05:26 | |
| What's important here to note is. | 00:05:29 | |
| If we thought about. | 00:05:31 | |
| Cutting a service. | 00:05:33 | |
| See where the revenues are for services. | 00:05:36 | |
| And how much of a percent of our budget they are. | 00:05:38 | |
| It would be. | 00:05:41 | |
| Ill advised. | 00:05:42 | |
| To look at ways to reduce a service. | 00:05:43 | |
| For our residents. | 00:05:46 | |
| Because that's that's a significant percentage of our overall bucket. | 00:05:48 | |
| And I'll share that in another image here in a second. Here's the adjusted of that same. | 00:05:52 | |
| That same bar chart. | 00:05:55 | |
| But now it's. | 00:05:58 | |
| Disregard the the text that's a little bit off, but the table itself. | 00:05:59 | |
| You can see that change. So when we factor in the consumer price index changes over the last 10 years. | 00:06:03 | |
| We've actually reduced our property tax by 5.7, almost 5.8. | 00:06:10 | |
| $1,000,000. | 00:06:14 | |
| In terms of the actual value. | 00:06:15 | |
| Of what we're paying in tax and what that can do in terms of funding services. | 00:06:18 | |
| So this is. | 00:06:25 | |
| What I was thinking of where I'd show it a little bit better, this is just looking at the percentage change. | 00:06:27 | |
| Or excuse me, not the percentage, change the percent of. | 00:06:32 | |
| The revenue, the. | 00:06:36 | |
| Whole bucket of revenues. | 00:06:37 | |
| Each year for these four major revenues, and again blue is property tax, yellow as sales taxed, green is charges for service. | 00:06:38 | |
| Dark green is grants. | 00:06:44 | |
| And you'll see that. | 00:06:46 | |
| Overtime looking even now to 2026. | 00:06:47 | |
| Property tax. | 00:06:51 | |
| Is. | 00:06:52 | |
| 22.5%. | 00:06:53 | |
| Of the overall. | 00:06:55 | |
| Portion or that's the piece of the pie, 22.5% of all of our revenues are comprised by property tax, nearly 50%. | 00:06:57 | |
| Comprised of. | 00:07:05 | |
| Service charges. | 00:07:07 | |
| 6.2%. | 00:07:08 | |
| Being then the sales tax in the 14.1% are grants, which is noted as I mentioned down from the last few years. | 00:07:09 | |
| Things have been reduced. That's not a change in. | 00:07:17 | |
| What we? | 00:07:20 | |
| What we've been doing just a change in what dollars are available for us. A significant contributor to that higher, higher line in | 00:07:21 | |
| and increase from 2021 to 2023 is ARPA dollars as well. | 00:07:27 | |
| So with that. | 00:07:33 | |
| Factored out, it's probably a much more. | 00:07:35 | |
| Consistent or. | 00:07:38 | |
| Flatline. | 00:07:39 | |
| So I like this slide and it was the concept was provided to me. | 00:07:42 | |
| Many, many months ago by our finance director. So I wanted to, Mr. Chair, if it's all right, light up his microphone. | 00:07:48 | |
| And allow. | 00:07:54 | |
| Mr. Tilda Share. | 00:07:56 | |
| Kind of the the point of this slide. | 00:07:58 | |
| OK. | 00:08:15 | |
| Nope. | 00:08:16 | |
| How about tapping it now? | 00:08:18 | |
| Nope. Maybe. Maybe you can just. | 00:08:20 | |
| Yeah, I was gonna say, maybe you could just do that. | 00:08:26 | |
| Nope, it's Bill. | 00:08:30 | |
| Oh, there we go. | 00:08:32 | |
| They're not swung the right way. | 00:08:33 | |
| That's OK, you still got some steps in. | 00:08:35 | |
| Back and back again. | 00:08:38 | |
| So this slide basically. | 00:08:40 | |
| Represents philosophies or approaches to budgeting. Obviously no one will like the. | 00:08:43 | |
| Below budget, right where? | 00:08:49 | |
| If you were to. | 00:08:52 | |
| Think of your revenues versus expenses. You're spending more than you. | 00:08:53 | |
| Then you bring in. | 00:08:58 | |
| Right where you're underwater. | 00:08:59 | |
| Oftentimes in government we talk about a balanced budget. | 00:09:02 | |
| And oftentimes if we just match expenses to revenues? | 00:09:05 | |
| We're treading water. | 00:09:11 | |
| We're really not planning for the future. | 00:09:12 | |
| So oftentimes in. | 00:09:18 | |
| Good governance. | 00:09:21 | |
| You'll see. | 00:09:22 | |
| Departments and so forth basically. | 00:09:24 | |
| Over. | 00:09:28 | |
| Overestimating expenses under estimating revenues. | 00:09:29 | |
| Gives a bit of a cushion. | 00:09:33 | |
| And allows us to. | 00:09:36 | |
| Bring in fund balance and so it's just above budget. | 00:09:38 | |
| But where? | 00:09:43 | |
| The obvious. | 00:09:45 | |
| Thing here that we're just staying afloat in that example. | 00:09:46 | |
| But the obvious thing that we're really trying to do. | 00:09:49 | |
| Is we're trying to. | 00:09:52 | |
| Get up on our skis. | 00:09:53 | |
| And we're really trying to make sure that we're we're planning for the future. | 00:09:55 | |
| And so oftentimes, it won't just be your operational expenses. | 00:09:59 | |
| Balanced against your operational revenues, but you'll. | 00:10:04 | |
| Be trying to. | 00:10:08 | |
| Basically. | 00:10:10 | |
| Plan for the future you're trying to. | 00:10:13 | |
| To to get up on the skis. | 00:10:15 | |
| What I like about this image? | 00:10:18 | |
| Is. | 00:10:20 | |
| To think about. | 00:10:22 | |
| Who's driving the boat? | 00:10:23 | |
| And whose? | 00:10:25 | |
| The water skier. | 00:10:26 | |
| And. | 00:10:28 | |
| Generally speaking as staff. | 00:10:29 | |
| Were were were the ones? | 00:10:31 | |
| Trying to perform were the skiers. | 00:10:34 | |
| As a board and as government. | 00:10:37 | |
| You have the opportunity to. | 00:10:40 | |
| To drive the policies. | 00:10:42 | |
| That that help us to. | 00:10:45 | |
| To move forward or not? | 00:10:47 | |
| And so. | 00:10:49 | |
| That. | 00:10:50 | |
| That's what I like about this image. | 00:10:51 | |
| It was shared with me at one point in time and so I've. | 00:10:53 | |
| I've used it. | 00:10:57 | |
| And so anyways, does that cover what you want in Cameron? | 00:10:58 | |
| It does. Thank you. | 00:11:02 | |
| So and. | 00:11:03 | |
| Enjoy the picture because I'm probably going to share it every year. | 00:11:05 | |
| To a degree and I would say. | 00:11:09 | |
| With what I want to share next. | 00:11:10 | |
| Before we even get to the next slide. | 00:11:13 | |
| We are really in a lot of ways right now. | 00:11:16 | |
| As your administrator, I would share with you. | 00:11:19 | |
| We have been balanced and as costs increased to go up. | 00:11:22 | |
| We are. | 00:11:27 | |
| We're utilizing the. | 00:11:28 | |
| The resources that are there in the in the third stick figure. | 00:11:31 | |
| With a life jacket floating just above the water. | 00:11:34 | |
| You're above budget with fund reserves. | 00:11:37 | |
| So for years we've whittled down fund reserves. | 00:11:40 | |
| For various things. | 00:11:44 | |
| But we've. | 00:11:46 | |
| Been very conservative in our estimates, so we. | 00:11:48 | |
| At the end of the year, even though we plan for and whittle down those fund reserves for operations or expect to when we budget. | 00:11:51 | |
| We've we've been all right. | 00:11:58 | |
| But as costs increase. | 00:12:00 | |
| We have to. | 00:12:02 | |
| Not only review and and. | 00:12:03 | |
| Remove or eliminate certain things, but we also have to be a little more. | 00:12:05 | |
| Aggressive with some of our cost estimates, so. | 00:12:10 | |
| We're not necessarily eroding fund balance. | 00:12:14 | |
| There's some things we'll talk about with fund balance in a little bit, but we are. | 00:12:18 | |
| This year's budget in order to balance. | 00:12:22 | |
| We're looking at. | 00:12:24 | |
| The last three years of. | 00:12:26 | |
| Revenues and expenses when we make our projections. | 00:12:28 | |
| But we're. | 00:12:32 | |
| We're upping that a little bit from where our typical conservative numbers would be just because. | 00:12:33 | |
| We know that. | 00:12:39 | |
| With our. | 00:12:40 | |
| Conservative estimates and operations we've had in the past, it wouldn't work. | 00:12:41 | |
| So. | 00:12:44 | |
| Let me just share with you. | 00:12:46 | |
| In case you. | 00:12:47 | |
| You may recall from our discussion on. | 00:12:48 | |
| Or the e-mail. Excuse me on Saturday. | 00:12:51 | |
| But one of the sections is called Balancing the Budget and Closing Funding gap. | 00:12:54 | |
| So in this section of the very. | 00:12:58 | |
| Lengthy e-mail. | 00:13:01 | |
| Thank you to all those that read it. | 00:13:02 | |
| In that section, we're talking about in a bulleted list. | 00:13:05 | |
| The revenues that we've estimated higher than we typically do. | 00:13:09 | |
| Still within the realm of something that is possible and. | 00:13:12 | |
| I think pretty safe to expect. | 00:13:16 | |
| But much more than. | 00:13:19 | |
| We've relied on those. | 00:13:21 | |
| On those projected revenues, much more than we have in the past. | 00:13:23 | |
| In order to make things work. | 00:13:26 | |
| With the budget that is before you and this. | 00:13:28 | |
| Excludes the. | 00:13:30 | |
| The capital improvement plan items that we're going to. | 00:13:32 | |
| Talk about tonight as well. | 00:13:35 | |
| So one example of that is federal corrections revenue. | 00:13:37 | |
| We've increased the. | 00:13:41 | |
| The anticipated revenue. | 00:13:42 | |
| In the budget by $212,000. | 00:13:44 | |
| We expect to get that. | 00:13:48 | |
| But we're leaving. We're sticking our neck out a little bit farther. | 00:13:49 | |
| To make that work right. | 00:13:53 | |
| We've estimated an increase of $500,000. | 00:13:54 | |
| In the WIMCR Wisconsin. | 00:13:58 | |
| MCR revenue this winter payment. | 00:14:01 | |
| That fits within the trend. | 00:14:04 | |
| But it is again. | 00:14:06 | |
| We're we're not saying. | 00:14:08 | |
| A real low number anymore where? | 00:14:10 | |
| We're estimating. | 00:14:12 | |
| With what we think will be the actual number, but if it's lower. | 00:14:13 | |
| We've put ourselves out a little bit. | 00:14:16 | |
| With some risk. | 00:14:18 | |
| There's also a rolling surplus that we will be applying, so the fund balance in Fund 200 for Human Services and health. | 00:14:21 | |
| From now on, we'll make sure we maintain a minimum balance in that fund. | 00:14:27 | |
| If possible. | 00:14:31 | |
| We won't take money from that fund for any. | 00:14:33 | |
| For any purpose and put toward operations. | 00:14:35 | |
| Any if they're below that minimum balance. | 00:14:38 | |
| So if they have less than that, we'll keep. | 00:14:41 | |
| Going and trying to fill it with reimbursements that we get from the state, but once they reach that minimum balance, we're | 00:14:43 | |
| skimming everything off the top and applying that to their operations to reduce the amount of property tax that we have to | 00:14:48 | |
| allocate to Human Services and health. | 00:14:52 | |
| So again. | 00:14:57 | |
| Ultimately to take away their. | 00:14:59 | |
| We are sticking our neck out a little farther. | 00:15:01 | |
| When it comes to what we're willing to risk or what we're willing to to anticipate for revenues. | 00:15:03 | |
| Which? | 00:15:10 | |
| Again, I don't. | 00:15:10 | |
| Believer said. I don't believe we're setting up. | 00:15:12 | |
| Ourselves up for failure with this budget but. | 00:15:14 | |
| This is a trend and a movement that we need to be aware of. | 00:15:16 | |
| Indirect cost contributions from. | 00:15:20 | |
| Clearview. | 00:15:22 | |
| So Clearview is a. | 00:15:23 | |
| Is a fee based. | 00:15:24 | |
| And. | 00:15:26 | |
| Fee based operation. | 00:15:27 | |
| People coming pay for it and those are the revenues that. | 00:15:29 | |
| Pay for the whole function. | 00:15:33 | |
| We are they had in the past. | 00:15:34 | |
| Allocated. | 00:15:37 | |
| Or written off. | 00:15:38 | |
| About $800,000 of in kind services. | 00:15:39 | |
| Basically in providing. | 00:15:42 | |
| Rooms for wards of the county. | 00:15:44 | |
| That are under the charge or responsibility of Human Services. | 00:15:47 | |
| And health, they've provided those rooms. | 00:15:50 | |
| Free of charge to Human Services and Health. | 00:15:53 | |
| We would no matter what have to find places for these individuals, probably there, but rather than have HSH pay. | 00:15:55 | |
| Clearview has taken that on this year instead of doing that allocation. | 00:16:02 | |
| We simply pulled a full amount of indirect costs for. | 00:16:08 | |
| Services. | 00:16:12 | |
| From our indirect cost reports we do every year. | 00:16:12 | |
| And ask Clearview to put in that full amount which is about 1.4 million. | 00:16:16 | |
| And what that does is. | 00:16:20 | |
| No longer will they do the in kind. | 00:16:22 | |
| Write off or. | 00:16:24 | |
| Provision of those spaces Human Services and health will we will book and document Human Services and health paying the. | 00:16:26 | |
| The rent for the space of the charges. | 00:16:33 | |
| But. | 00:16:36 | |
| Clear views paying directly to Dodge County. | 00:16:37 | |
| A greater amount that. | 00:16:40 | |
| Cancels out that 800,000 and adds an additional $602,000 into our revenue bucket. | 00:16:41 | |
| For operations for the rest of the county. | 00:16:47 | |
| In addition to those things I want to mention. | 00:16:53 | |
| And this is important because I want you to know where we are. | 00:16:57 | |
| Endeavoring to provide. | 00:17:00 | |
| Of value to dodge. | 00:17:03 | |
| For Dodge County residents. | 00:17:05 | |
| And be conservative in what we're providing. | 00:17:07 | |
| There were over $230,000 worth of new requests. | 00:17:09 | |
| And primarily operations related. | 00:17:14 | |
| That were. | 00:17:17 | |
| That were. | 00:17:18 | |
| Rejected. | 00:17:19 | |
| So. | 00:17:20 | |
| Things that departments came. | 00:17:21 | |
| Came forward asking for. | 00:17:23 | |
| Some things were. | 00:17:25 | |
| Were approved. | 00:17:26 | |
| Dollars were allocated a lot of. | 00:17:27 | |
| Capital or one time expenses, but operational things like new positions and for the most part. | 00:17:29 | |
| Those unless they could fund themselves because of a grant or a different service fee. | 00:17:36 | |
| Those those requests were denied. | 00:17:41 | |
| We look at highway. | 00:17:44 | |
| Highway operations and. | 00:17:46 | |
| Sheriff's Office operations, they did have some reductions. | 00:17:49 | |
| We did make some reductions in terms of dollars allocated. | 00:17:52 | |
| The. | 00:17:56 | |
| The highway amount is was based on salary projections, but we've. | 00:17:58 | |
| This time based actual cost on previous years. | 00:18:04 | |
| The sheriff's reduction. | 00:18:06 | |
| Is also related to. | 00:18:08 | |
| Cost, just cost increases in that in the. | 00:18:10 | |
| Sheriff's Office that have been. | 00:18:13 | |
| Addressed with policy changes that have allowed us to reduce. | 00:18:16 | |
| The cost or the anticipated cost for 2026 in the Sheriff's Office? | 00:18:19 | |
| And I will leave it at that right now. | 00:18:25 | |
| But that information is the e-mail that I sent you previously, and the clerk does have copies. | 00:18:27 | |
| That we will provide later on in the. | 00:18:33 | |
| In the meeting. | 00:18:36 | |
| So that you have a hard copy as well as. | 00:18:37 | |
| As well as the e-mail. | 00:18:40 | |
| So moving forward. | 00:18:41 | |
| We have a few options I. | 00:18:42 | |
| Back up a little bit, I'm jumping now to. | 00:18:45 | |
| Not just the budget document, Which? | 00:18:47 | |
| Hopefully you've got some questions. We'll talk about those in a minute. | 00:18:49 | |
| But jumping to capital improvement planning because that's the other piece of what we need to talk about. | 00:18:52 | |
| You'll recall we approved or you approved. | 00:18:57 | |
| A number of projects in the capital improvement plan, but we sat with about $21 million of projects that were. | 00:19:00 | |
| Unfunded or that where funding had been had not been identified. | 00:19:06 | |
| So. | 00:19:10 | |
| That's what we need to or we would like to talk about and dedicate some time to now. And so we have representatives from Ehlers | 00:19:11 | |
| and Associates. | 00:19:14 | |
| That will be joining me. | 00:19:18 | |
| Up front. | 00:19:20 | |
| And I would also ask maybe. | 00:19:22 | |
| Our finance director, if he's willing to come. | 00:19:23 | |
| Come up as well. | 00:19:25 | |
| But as they're getting ready to come up, four or, excuse me, five options. So one option number one we don't really want to do. | 00:19:27 | |
| But always we can do nothing and just cover our eyes, right and and. | 00:19:32 | |
| That will leave us without. | 00:19:38 | |
| Meet meeting our 22 miles of roads per year goal. | 00:19:40 | |
| We can. | 00:19:44 | |
| Apply all of our general fund, fund balance and possibly others. | 00:19:45 | |
| To cover these gaps. | 00:19:51 | |
| Again, not necessarily the wisest option if we want to be not only conservative, but. | 00:19:54 | |
| Plan for rainy days. | 00:20:00 | |
| We could. | 00:20:02 | |
| Endeavor to cut some services and reallocate dollars to capital projects. | 00:20:03 | |
| But I will go back for just a minute. | 00:20:07 | |
| To this slide. | 00:20:10 | |
| To point out that. | 00:20:11 | |
| Services comprise a significant portion of our budget. | 00:20:13 | |
| In terms of revenues? | 00:20:17 | |
| So. | 00:20:18 | |
| When we were taking away from the highest generating source. | 00:20:20 | |
| Of revenue for Dodge County if we address. | 00:20:24 | |
| Or try to cut services. | 00:20:27 | |
| We could initiate A referendum to increase tax base. I know that concerns about a referendum or referendums in the future have | 00:20:30 | |
| been discussed. | 00:20:33 | |
| In the last. | 00:20:36 | |
| Few months. | 00:20:38 | |
| So that's not an option that would really work for funding right now. We would have to wait until later in 2026 before we would | 00:20:40 | |
| know the outcome and begin to fund projects. | 00:20:45 | |
| So we probably would be looking at increased costs or? | 00:20:50 | |
| Again, deferring some of our capital plan items for another year. | 00:20:54 | |
| And then the last one. | 00:20:58 | |
| And the one that. | 00:20:59 | |
| I would like this body to strongly consider. | 00:21:02 | |
| Is issue bonds to generate dollars to fund long term capital improvements? | 00:21:04 | |
| Only the stuff. | 00:21:09 | |
| That's going to last. | 00:21:10 | |
| The next. | 00:21:12 | |
| 20 years. | 00:21:13 | |
| We don't want to. | 00:21:14 | |
| Borrow money. | 00:21:16 | |
| For uh. | 00:21:17 | |
| What we're doing on a daily basis, our operations, that's like going to Check Into Cash. | 00:21:19 | |
| And none of us want to go to Check Into Cash. | 00:21:24 | |
| For dollars. | 00:21:26 | |
| What we're talking about is investing in the infrastructure. | 00:21:27 | |
| That hopefully will be here in some cases long after we have moved on to. | 00:21:31 | |
| Whatever is our next stage of life, and maybe not even here on the county board or here working for Dodge County, but the | 00:21:36 | |
| individuals that are here. | 00:21:40 | |
| Would be using those things. | 00:21:44 | |
| And also paying for them. | 00:21:46 | |
| Rather than you and I saving up. | 00:21:48 | |
| To buy something. | 00:21:50 | |
| That we might not fully utilize. | 00:21:51 | |
| Anyway, umm. | 00:21:53 | |
| So with that. | 00:21:55 | |
| I'll turn time over to Greg Johnson and Phil Carson from ELLERS and also welcome up our Finance Director. | 00:21:58 | |
| Well, actually just Greg Johnson. Phil gets the oh, Phil is coming up good. | 00:22:04 | |
| Greg is the guy. | 00:22:08 | |
| I was going to say poor sucker, but I'm not going to say that, but Greg is the guy that's going to be most doing most of the | 00:22:11 | |
| presentation. | 00:22:13 | |
| But we'll all just. | 00:22:18 | |
| Standing here and crowd around a bit. | 00:22:19 | |
| And as you have questions. | 00:22:22 | |
| We'll take them. | 00:22:25 | |
| Let me. | 00:22:26 | |
| Sorry, Greg, there you are. | 00:22:29 | |
| Take. Take it away. | 00:22:31 | |
| Good evening. Appreciate your time this evening to talk through some capital finance options for, as Cameron mentioned, some of | 00:22:34 | |
| the counties. | 00:22:38 | |
| Larger infrastructure projects. | 00:22:42 | |
| As well as some potential facility improvements going forward. | 00:22:44 | |
| Before we begin and just kind of look at what capital financing options might look like. | 00:22:49 | |
| Let's start with where the county is presently with your existing debt service. | 00:22:54 | |
| Presently in your 2025 budget, the County did not have any levy for debt service. Your existing principal and interest payments | 00:23:00 | |
| are paid from sales tax revenue, Clearview operations and and Hwy. operations. | 00:23:07 | |
| What we show in this chart. | 00:23:15 | |
| As an example, as if a portion of the debt service that's presently paid by sales tax. | 00:23:17 | |
| Were to be incorporated into a tax levy for your 2026 budget. | 00:23:23 | |
| That amount would be approximately $944,250. We'll talk about why we're looking at that in a few moments. | 00:23:28 | |
| But what that would mean to your? | 00:23:35 | |
| Tax rate per thousand. It would add $0.08 per thousand if you converted a portion of your sales tax. | 00:23:37 | |
| Supported debt to levy. | 00:23:43 | |
| So far a $300,000 property that would be about. | 00:23:46 | |
| $25.47 per year. | 00:23:49 | |
| So. | 00:23:53 | |
| Part of the reason we're showing this is when we look at some options in the future for financing capital projects. | 00:23:54 | |
| It starts to kind of. | 00:23:59 | |
| Slowly ramp up. | 00:24:01 | |
| Your levy for debt service and that tax rate impact versus going from zero to. | 00:24:02 | |
| To financing some projects with that and levying for that full amount of debt service. | 00:24:07 | |
| In this financing illustration, we've identified. | 00:24:15 | |
| Financing some projects through the issuance of general obligation debt every other year. | 00:24:18 | |
| So these are some estimates that we worked on with staff just to identify some capital funding amounts. So you'll see these fall | 00:24:25 | |
| into 3 categories. | 00:24:29 | |
| Road improvements, some tower improvements related to communications infrastructure and then facility improvements. | 00:24:34 | |
| So the amount total amount in 2026 is 37,000,020. | 00:24:41 | |
| 28 it's 57 million and in 20-30 it's 37 million. | 00:24:46 | |
| So essentially. | 00:24:51 | |
| Occurring and going through the debt issuance process every other year. | 00:24:53 | |
| What we've done in our financing plan is really structured the debt and amortize it over. | 00:24:59 | |
| Considering useful wife of the assets, so all of the road projects are amortized over 10 years. The tower and facility | 00:25:05 | |
| improvements are amortized over 20. | 00:25:11 | |
| To take into account kind of the useful life of those assets. So we showed estimated debt service schedules for those borrowing | 00:25:17 | |
| amounts every other year. | 00:25:21 | |
| To kind of fund that infrastructure. | 00:25:27 | |
| So I won't go through the debt schedules themselves, which you'll just see for each issuance, we show the debt related to each | 00:25:30 | |
| capital asset being financed, roads, towers and facilities. | 00:25:35 | |
| So it's really a plan that covers out out through 2030. | 00:25:41 | |
| In terms of the looking at kind of what that does to your tax rate for debt service? | 00:25:47 | |
| We're going to kind of work our way across here from from left to right to kind of show that impact. So as I mentioned, if the | 00:25:54 | |
| county levied a portion of its existing debt service in 2026 at $944,250. | 00:26:02 | |
| You know that would be the the fiscal impact on the 2026 budget. So again that is about. | 00:26:09 | |
| 8-8 cents per thousand of value for 300,000 value property. That's $25 a year for debt service. | 00:26:16 | |
| And these columns under proposed at in 20/26/2028 and 2030. We show the gross principal and interest repaid for the debt service | 00:26:24 | |
| for each of those issues. And then we show a portion of the. | 00:26:32 | |
| New debt continued to be repaid by. | 00:26:39 | |
| Sales tax. | 00:26:43 | |
| So the sales tax revenue at this illustration. | 00:26:45 | |
| Is eventually capped out at about 3.5 million for debt. | 00:26:48 | |
| It's increasing about 2% per year until we hit hit that $3.5 billion maximum cap that we set for this model. | 00:26:52 | |
| So when we look at how that could impact your property tax levy in this levy change from prior year. | 00:27:02 | |
| You started with a modest debt service amount of 9 or 44,250 for your 2026 budget and then. | 00:27:09 | |
| Incorporate debt service every other year. | 00:27:17 | |
| From. | 00:27:20 | |
| 2026 to 2027, the levy for debt service would increase approximately $637,000. | 00:27:22 | |
| From the prior year. | 00:27:29 | |
| So for our 300,000. | 00:27:31 | |
| Valued property. | 00:27:33 | |
| That would result in $40 in the. | 00:27:34 | |
| Total tax bill for the county for debt service. | 00:27:37 | |
| So that increase over prior year is about $15. | 00:27:40 | |
| And then you'll see the debt service levy increase annually per year. | 00:27:44 | |
| Is about $1,580,000 and so you'll see that total tax rate for debt service. | 00:27:49 | |
| Starts to ramp up $8.08 per 1013 cents per thousand and gradually starts to peak out at about $0.62 per thousand. | 00:27:55 | |
| Then this far right hand column we show the increase each year for debt service to fund this full. | 00:28:04 | |
| Program of capital improvements with projects funded every other year from 2026 through 2030. | 00:28:11 | |
| So that increase over the fire over the prior year kind of ranges from you know $15 at the lower end to about $36 increase over | 00:28:18 | |
| the prior year for our 300,000 valued property. | 00:28:25 | |
| You'll see going forward in our model, we kind of show in 2033 the debt service levy starts to decrease. That's really to account | 00:28:33 | |
| for the end of our planning model. | 00:28:38 | |
| If the county continued on a. | 00:28:43 | |
| Every other year debt issuance schedule, the next debt issuance would be in 2032, which would hit your levy in 2033, which is why | 00:28:46 | |
| we've built them. | 00:28:50 | |
| A decline. | 00:28:55 | |
| In the. | 00:28:56 | |
| Tax levy increase for that year for debt service. | 00:28:57 | |
| So this is the illustrate. | 00:29:00 | |
| As Cameron mentioned, kind of incorporating some of your. | 00:29:02 | |
| Larger ticket capital investments to kind of amortize that over? | 00:29:06 | |
| Their useful life. | 00:29:11 | |
| And have future generations that will benefit from those assets help to pay for it by incorporating the debt service into your | 00:29:13 | |
| levy. | 00:29:16 | |
| But showing that levee kind of gradually increasing and then that increase year over year. | 00:29:21 | |
| Just for debt service capping out about $1,580,000. | 00:29:26 | |
| To just look at a different scenario, same borrowing amounts, but in this case, if you continue to your current practice of not | 00:29:35 | |
| having a levy for debt service for your existing debt that's outstanding. | 00:29:41 | |
| So 2026 your debt service levy would be 0. | 00:29:47 | |
| As you start to incorporate, you know the same amount of debt service that. | 00:29:52 | |
| Was in the previous illustration. It just results in a more, you know, significant. | 00:29:56 | |
| Uptick in terms of that fiscal impact, so you go from. | 00:30:00 | |
| Obviously no tax rate per thousand to $0.13 per thousand, which on a 300,000 valued property would be about $40 a year for debt | 00:30:05 | |
| service. | 00:30:09 | |
| So. | 00:30:13 | |
| Back at the previous slide. | 00:30:14 | |
| Kind of. | 00:30:16 | |
| You know, shows about a $25 increase, then a $40 increase. Here it would just go from 0 to $40. | 00:30:17 | |
| So just kind of shows, you know. | 00:30:24 | |
| You can look at different options in terms of how you layer in that impact in terms of. | 00:30:26 | |
| Incorporating a debt service levy when there isn't 1 presently. | 00:30:32 | |
| One other item we like to look at is really your state. | 00:30:37 | |
| Borrowing limit. | 00:30:42 | |
| Which is the same for all counties and municipalities. The amount of general obligation. | 00:30:43 | |
| Principal outstanding cannot exceed 5% of the county's total equalized value. | 00:30:49 | |
| So at the end of fiscal year 2025, the county has 16,995,000 of debt outstanding. | 00:30:55 | |
| You're at about 2.96% of your statutory debt limit, which leaves you. | 00:31:02 | |
| 557 million of borrowing capacity. | 00:31:09 | |
| With these financings every other year at the dollar amount that we identified for illustration. | 00:31:12 | |
| For roads, facilities. | 00:31:18 | |
| And other capital items you're looking at, you know that picking out about 15% of your utilization. | 00:31:20 | |
| So really it's as far as legal borrowing capacity, the county has sufficient borrowing capacity. It's really more about. | 00:31:28 | |
| Budgetary impacts levy impacts affordability because legally you have, you know, sufficient borrowing capacity to fund. | 00:31:35 | |
| Capital improvements at the levels that we've identified in our model. | 00:31:43 | |
| So again, just to kind of summarize this model, so the debt was structured to really arrive at a. | 00:31:48 | |
| Consistent levy increase year over year also take into account. | 00:31:54 | |
| The existing debt service and have that. | 00:31:59 | |
| Layered in as you kind of ramp up your your debt. | 00:32:03 | |
| The levy again decreases in 2033 to account for. | 00:32:06 | |
| Future debt, if that were to occur beyond our planning period and your debt capacity utilization reaches about 15%. So it's really | 00:32:11 | |
| more about the levy impact in terms of how that impacts your budget. | 00:32:17 | |
| You just mentioned that there's an extra 0. | 00:32:23 | |
| So it's not. | 00:32:26 | |
| Oh, yes, correct. Yeah, 1,580,000, yeah, there, there is an extra 0 in there, yes. So if we just go back. | 00:32:28 | |
| Again, it's that. | 00:32:37 | |
| Million. | 00:32:40 | |
| 550 in this illustration, and then if we go back to the other one. | 00:32:42 | |
| That kind of ramps up at that million 580. So here's where that number CS apology is extra. | 00:32:46 | |
| Extra 0 typed in there so. | 00:32:51 | |
| Yeah, that's right. That's right. | 00:32:56 | |
| Yes, Cameron gets the Gold Star. | 00:32:58 | |
| So this is again just some illustrations just to kind of show how a. | 00:33:02 | |
| Financing of capital improvements, kind of through issuance of debt could be incorporated into your existing budget. | 00:33:07 | |
| And to kind of look at kind of a multi year plan, but only look at issuance every other year. | 00:33:14 | |
| And really trying to arrive at arrive at a levee impact that's fairly consistent for budgetary purposes. | 00:33:20 | |
| Thank you. Could I ask Greg that before you're finished? I know you mentioned it, but. | 00:33:27 | |
| Would you just maybe touch again? This is. | 00:33:31 | |
| Based on our conversations. | 00:33:34 | |
| But it's a, it's a, It's a guess and a Gee, here's what it could look like. | 00:33:35 | |
| Is that correct? Correct. | 00:33:40 | |
| Correct. | 00:33:42 | |
| Yeah. It's really all driven by kind of these dollar amounts which were kind of identified as kind of some initial planning | 00:33:43 | |
| estimate, so. | 00:33:46 | |
| You know, while you're looking at some different amounts over kind of the the multi year period, we're trying to structure the | 00:33:51 | |
| debt to take into account the useful life of the assets. | 00:33:55 | |
| But also try to arrive at a levee impact that's fairly consistent year over year. | 00:34:00 | |
| For budgetary planning purposes. | 00:34:07 | |
| We have a question if you're ready for questions. | 00:34:11 | |
| Supervisor Der. | 00:34:16 | |
| I just think this is really good, sound municipal policy. | 00:34:21 | |
| And we previously. | 00:34:25 | |
| Denied. | 00:34:27 | |
| A $10 million one percent bond. | 00:34:28 | |
| And my I actually used to work for a municipal bond firm and so. | 00:34:31 | |
| It was pretty astounding. | 00:34:35 | |
| And it was. | 00:34:37 | |
| Honestly, it was just a lack. | 00:34:38 | |
| Of connecting that municipal finance is different from your checkbook. | 00:34:40 | |
| And. | 00:34:44 | |
| If you looked at the debt. | 00:34:45 | |
| That we take on for the size of our county and the taxpayers. | 00:34:46 | |
| We would all be bankrupt if we treated. | 00:34:51 | |
| Our county financing, the way we treat our checkbook. | 00:34:54 | |
| Because we literally cannot fund it every year without. | 00:34:59 | |
| Dramatic. | 00:35:02 | |
| Immediate tax increases. | 00:35:04 | |
| Otherwise we have to let things decline, like the roads that. | 00:35:07 | |
| Everybody's been complaining to me about for years, and so this is truly what. | 00:35:11 | |
| Most. | 00:35:17 | |
| Municipalities. | 00:35:18 | |
| And cities. | 00:35:19 | |
| And state governments do. | 00:35:20 | |
| To fund long term capital projects and I actually think. | 00:35:23 | |
| It's irresponsible for us to just constantly look at the short term, year to year. | 00:35:27 | |
| And so. | 00:35:33 | |
| If you look at Clearview. | 00:35:35 | |
| That amazing building. | 00:35:36 | |
| Right was built. | 00:35:38 | |
| By financing it. | 00:35:40 | |
| And the only thing the county pays? | 00:35:43 | |
| Is just the debt on the bond, which is. | 00:35:45 | |
| You know, coming to its end. | 00:35:47 | |
| And we get money from Clearview. They're like an enterprise fund, like we've made a lot of money from that investment and we've | 00:35:49 | |
| also provided excellent services. | 00:35:54 | |
| So. | 00:35:59 | |
| When you when you fix infrastructure, it's long term. | 00:35:59 | |
| And we? | 00:36:03 | |
| End up providing a lot of value. | 00:36:05 | |
| To future county boards. | 00:36:07 | |
| And excellent service. | 00:36:10 | |
| To the. | 00:36:12 | |
| People that are going to use these things and drive on these roads. | 00:36:13 | |
| But it's also fiscally responsible to spread stuff out over. | 00:36:16 | |
| 10 or 15 or. | 00:36:21 | |
| Were 20 years. | 00:36:23 | |
| That's that's actually normal and responsible. | 00:36:24 | |
| Of funding and. | 00:36:27 | |
| Obviously they've put. | 00:36:29 | |
| Tremendous amount of. | 00:36:30 | |
| Thought into this. | 00:36:31 | |
| And they're showing that this is. | 00:36:32 | |
| You know, for individual homeowner dollars. | 00:36:34 | |
| Just, umm. | 00:36:38 | |
| A few dollars a year. | 00:36:38 | |
| And I think most people would pay that if they knew they could get their roads. | 00:36:40 | |
| Actually done. | 00:36:44 | |
| And remember, this isn't giving us a road rating of A. | 00:36:47 | |
| I think. | 00:36:50 | |
| We can ask them but I think it was a rating more of like B minus or C right? This is just to keep our roads average. | 00:36:51 | |
| And we'd have to borrow a lot more to get. | 00:36:58 | |
| An A rating. | 00:37:00 | |
| So. | 00:37:01 | |
| That's what I have. | 00:37:02 | |
| Anyone else with? | 00:37:05 | |
| Supervisor Van de Zen. | 00:37:07 | |
| I didn't catch it if you said it, but. | 00:37:11 | |
| What's the? | 00:37:12 | |
| Interest on that? | 00:37:14 | |
| Bond interest. | 00:37:15 | |
| So in these illustrations, so for 2026. | 00:37:17 | |
| So when miscible bonds are sold, it's not uncommon that different. | 00:37:21 | |
| Different years will have a different interest rate, but the interest rate is fixed at the time that the debt is sold, so it's | 00:37:26 | |
| locked in place. | 00:37:29 | |
| Typically there's a call feature, an optional call feature that allows you to refinance or make prepayments at some point in the | 00:37:33 | |
| future. But what we're estimating for the financing in 2026, which is rates that are you know higher than what we're presently | 00:37:39 | |
| seeing in the market, but we want to build in kind of some cushion of. | 00:37:45 | |
| 2.6 to about 4.84%. So we ran this analysis. | 00:37:51 | |
| Kind of earlier kind of in September discussions with staff, we were adding about 45 basis points to these rates. A basis point is | 00:37:57 | |
| .01. | 00:38:01 | |
| Percent. So since that time we've kind of seen. | 00:38:05 | |
| Bond yields kind of generally start to decline, but this is a conservative estimate, so. | 00:38:09 | |
| You know, was mentioned kind of where interest rates, you know, have been historically. | 00:38:14 | |
| When you still look at these rates and look at where municipal bond rates have been over, you know, the last 25 to 30 years. | 00:38:19 | |
| We are still in any historically low interest rate environment, not as low as it was. | 00:38:25 | |
| A few years ago, but those were rock bottom. | 00:38:30 | |
| Low rates, but it's, you know, it's still. | 00:38:32 | |
| You can still get capital at attractive interest rates. | 00:38:35 | |
| Anyone else? | 00:38:42 | |
| Supervisor Houchin. | 00:38:46 | |
| Thank you. | 00:38:47 | |
| So in this model. | 00:38:48 | |
| You're doing roads every other year. | 00:38:50 | |
| So. | 00:38:52 | |
| How do we pay for roads? | 00:38:53 | |
| We do roads every year. | 00:38:55 | |
| We would not do them every year. | 00:38:57 | |
| We would, we would, we would do them every year. So. | 00:38:58 | |
| In this In this. | 00:39:02 | |
| Just. | 00:39:04 | |
| Kick at the kick at the cat. Or can if you like cats, we'll say can anyway at this. | 00:39:04 | |
| This what we're talking about doing here is. | 00:39:11 | |
| The borrowing for roads, we're borrowing the dollars enough to accommodate all the projects that we would be putting through those | 00:39:14 | |
| two years. | 00:39:18 | |
| So. | 00:39:22 | |
| We're borrowing every other year because there's a cost. | 00:39:24 | |
| Associated with all the. | 00:39:27 | |
| Folks involved in going to market and borrowing the dollars. | 00:39:28 | |
| This way we're we're reducing that. | 00:39:32 | |
| Plus it's a projection, so. | 00:39:34 | |
| Ebbs and flows, but. | 00:39:38 | |
| That's how we would cover it. So yes, the projects are still happening every other year. | 00:39:39 | |
| But our plans for how to borrow the excuse me happening every year, but. | 00:39:43 | |
| The borrowings just every other. | 00:39:48 | |
| And you think all we're going to need for facilities is 20 million? | 00:39:49 | |
| That just doesn't sound like. | 00:39:52 | |
| Well, I think we probably need more. | 00:39:54 | |
| Yeah, it depends on what we need to do with our. | 00:39:56 | |
| Right. But I think right now looking at. | 00:39:59 | |
| Existing facilities. | 00:40:02 | |
| What we what we truly, truly need and what needs to happen, we still have a little ways out. If you're looking at the screen and | 00:40:05 | |
| see that 2028 is the first time dollars are. | 00:40:09 | |
| Included there. | 00:40:14 | |
| It's at least in part because. | 00:40:15 | |
| We're we're expecting that. | 00:40:18 | |
| We're going to figure out what some of those costs are and take some time to plan for how we. | 00:40:20 | |
| How we fix? | 00:40:24 | |
| Whatever The thing is, and his towers include radios. | 00:40:26 | |
| But again, this is. | 00:40:34 | |
| This is taking a look at what we knew we fell short on. | 00:40:35 | |
| Right up so roads constitute of everything that we did not fund in 2020 for 2026. | 00:40:39 | |
| Through 30 capital improvement plan. | 00:40:47 | |
| That what we have for next year in that plan is 21 million I think total. | 00:40:49 | |
| Ten. Well, whatever the number is 10 million. | 00:40:55 | |
| Only 10 million. | 00:40:58 | |
| Is roadway projects. | 00:40:59 | |
| The rest is for facilities or towers and we have built out such that. | 00:41:01 | |
| We can. We can talk through and we would. | 00:41:06 | |
| Obviously refine a lot of this before we. | 00:41:08 | |
| Actually brought something back to to vote on. | 00:41:11 | |
| Supervisor Sigmund. | 00:41:16 | |
| Thank you very much. Did I see correctly on the slides that? | 00:41:18 | |
| The property tax and levy impact for a $300,000 house is actually going to be less if there's no. | 00:41:23 | |
| Debt tax levy. | 00:41:31 | |
| Then if there is one. | 00:41:33 | |
| We didn't compare. We didn't compare debt, tax money, but maybe. | 00:41:36 | |
| Well, I thought there was. That's with that tax levy. | 00:41:40 | |
| It goes up to $186 in. | 00:41:43 | |
| 2020 some 20-30 something. | 00:41:47 | |
| But if you go to the one without the tax levy. | 00:41:49 | |
| It's only 183. | 00:41:54 | |
| So I'm saying. | 00:41:55 | |
| It goes up more when there's a debt tax levy than if there isn't. | 00:41:57 | |
| Yeah, I. | 00:42:00 | |
| I would turn to Mackenzie I. | 00:42:02 | |
| We just. | 00:42:04 | |
| I just. | 00:42:06 | |
| Talk with the paper earlier, I don't remember what exactly for the $300,000 home. It was like 1000. | 00:42:07 | |
| And 100 some odd dollars if we did nothing, if we just went from. | 00:42:13 | |
| Yet to last year to this year, we're at 1000. | 00:42:18 | |
| And I think $5 or something of that nature for that $300,000 home. | 00:42:22 | |
| So it would go down in. | 00:42:26 | |
| Nominally. | 00:42:28 | |
| And I think. | 00:42:31 | |
| That's what. | 00:42:31 | |
| Cameron was trying to demonstrate. | 00:42:32 | |
| That. | 00:42:34 | |
| It we exacerbate that when we actually apply inflation right and we go back. | 00:42:35 | |
| Your your taxes have. | 00:42:41 | |
| Basically reduced and that's that. | 00:42:43 | |
| In whole numbers. | 00:42:46 | |
| Over the last 10 years, you've seen him drop by. | 00:42:47 | |
| Almost $6 million, right? | 00:42:50 | |
| As contributing to the whole. | 00:42:52 | |
| County budget. | 00:42:55 | |
| All right, I probably wouldn't recommend you go out into the general public and actually try to convince them their taxes have | 00:42:57 | |
| gone down. | 00:43:00 | |
| If you. | 00:43:03 | |
| Figure inflation that's. | 00:43:04 | |
| Not the way to do it. | 00:43:06 | |
| But. | 00:43:08 | |
| I don't think anybody in this room here is against buildings. | 00:43:10 | |
| Towers. | 00:43:14 | |
| That kind of infrastructure with borrowing. | 00:43:15 | |
| But see. | 00:43:18 | |
| That is not roads. Roads get done every year. | 00:43:19 | |
| Roads should be budgeted for every year. | 00:43:23 | |
| Because that's the primary responsibility of how we department. | 00:43:27 | |
| And there's no reason that we have to figure that. Well, we don't have money for roles, but we have money for everything else in | 00:43:31 | |
| the highway department. | 00:43:34 | |
| I think that we're in error here to include roads in this. | 00:43:38 | |
| And I think. | 00:43:42 | |
| Money wise, it probably would. | 00:43:43 | |
| Substantiate that belief. | 00:43:46 | |
| Just. | 00:43:52 | |
| Backing away from how you figured inflation and everything. | 00:43:53 | |
| I was on a school board 20 some years ago on and this old Duffer said. | 00:43:59 | |
| Figures lie and liars figure. | 00:44:04 | |
| We have reached pretty far here. | 00:44:06 | |
| To make us feel good. | 00:44:09 | |
| About raising. | 00:44:11 | |
| Everything. | 00:44:13 | |
| And the public's not going to go for it. I mean, in my district we have a town and a village. | 00:44:14 | |
| That is screaming already because. | 00:44:19 | |
| They're a tax. What would you call it? | 00:44:22 | |
| They pull taxes out of their pockets, too. | 00:44:27 | |
| And now the county's coming and saying, well, we're only going to pull this much. | 00:44:30 | |
| That'd be fine if that's. | 00:44:34 | |
| The only thing that happened, but those tax jurisdictions are also pulling things out. | 00:44:35 | |
| I I mean. | 00:44:42 | |
| Looks good. | 00:44:42 | |
| But somehow I have a little bit of a feeling and I talked with you a few weeks back. | 00:44:44 | |
| And every time I said something, you. | 00:44:48 | |
| Nodded your head. Yeah, you're right, you're right, you know? | 00:44:51 | |
| But. | 00:44:54 | |
| This this thing came forward anyhow, so I'm trying to figure out how you can say that I'm right but yet. | 00:44:55 | |
| Don't change anything, you know. That's what I'm trying to figure out here. | 00:45:01 | |
| But I would recommend not. | 00:45:05 | |
| Doing the roads. | 00:45:06 | |
| In this kind of manner. | 00:45:07 | |
| Let's just fix our roads and not 22 miles. | 00:45:09 | |
| We don't need it. My Rd. got fixed this year. | 00:45:12 | |
| Everybody celebrating. | 00:45:15 | |
| It was 50 years old already. | 00:45:17 | |
| And now we're trying to fix them at 22 because they're no good. | 00:45:19 | |
| I don't think so. I think we can back down to 15 we. | 00:45:22 | |
| Lower that demand for. | 00:45:26 | |
| Money. | 00:45:27 | |
| And. | 00:45:29 | |
| I think we have an easier time budgeting for it in the highway department where it belongs. | 00:45:30 | |
| I mean, there's a lot of things I think should be considered, but. | 00:45:35 | |
| Borrowing for Rose isn't one of them. | 00:45:39 | |
| Like I say, buildings and towers, things like that, fine. | 00:45:41 | |
| You know, because that. | 00:45:44 | |
| That's more longer term, but roads are doing every year. | 00:45:45 | |
| Every year. Every year, so. | 00:45:48 | |
| Thank you. | 00:45:51 | |
| Anyone else? | 00:45:55 | |
| I can respond when we're done with this section. | 00:45:58 | |
| Supervisor Grukenberger. | 00:46:00 | |
| Thank you, Mr. Chairman. | 00:46:03 | |
| Would you be so kind? I mean, there's a lot of numbers and charts and stuff and there's. | 00:46:05 | |
| No paper on the desk for me to. | 00:46:09 | |
| See any of these? | 00:46:12 | |
| Calculations but. | 00:46:14 | |
| If you would be so kind as to go back to that. | 00:46:16 | |
| 628 Thirty chart. | 00:46:19 | |
| So is your. | 00:46:26 | |
| Perception then, that we would borrow 22 million every other year. | 00:46:27 | |
| To the point where over 10, excuse me, over. | 00:46:31 | |
| 20 years, we're going to borrow 200 and. | 00:46:36 | |
| $20 million. | 00:46:38 | |
| We've just accounted for, I understand, but we need a long term plan here. | 00:46:40 | |
| And it's not sustainable. I mean, if we borrow 22 million come in 2032. | 00:46:45 | |
| You know we're drinking this elixir. | 00:46:50 | |
| And we need to. | 00:46:52 | |
| To fix our roads, if this is the plan that we're going to take for our roads, that's going to have to extend into Infinity. | 00:46:54 | |
| 22,000,000 / 10 years will be $220 million. | 00:47:01 | |
| That's what I see when I see this chart borrowing 22 million every other year. | 00:47:06 | |
| Because otherwise, what are you going to do in 2032 and besides? | 00:47:11 | |
| You know just what I see here. You already got $131 million in borrowing over the next, what, 6 years? | 00:47:15 | |
| Yeah, so. | 00:47:22 | |
| Bear with me. | 00:47:26 | |
| What I would explain is this. | 00:47:28 | |
| Of the borrowing, the 22 were basically saying about $11 million per year for roads and that's today's dollars things you know | 00:47:30 | |
| will grow overtime, but we'll just. | 00:47:34 | |
| We'll just think about it in today's dollars. | 00:47:39 | |
| So. | 00:47:43 | |
| What what Ehlers tried to illustrate here is that in 30. | 00:47:45 | |
| You're 33, right? You're going to start to see. | 00:47:49 | |
| The the. | 00:47:52 | |
| Debt service reduce will start to drop off. | 00:47:54 | |
| And so you could continue to plan. | 00:47:57 | |
| And finance in the future and continue to. | 00:48:00 | |
| Pay for those roads in the future. | 00:48:03 | |
| And so it wouldn't drop off right? You just. | 00:48:06 | |
| Keep it flat. | 00:48:08 | |
| Another way that you could do it is you could say, hey, we don't want to do debt service for these roads. | 00:48:10 | |
| We're going to do a referendum. | 00:48:15 | |
| And we're going to put 11,000,000 on the, on the, on the tax levy to take care of roads because it's it's stepped up. | 00:48:18 | |
| And then it's you're not paying the interest, but you would still be increasing the taxes to cover that. | 00:48:25 | |
| That portion right? And So what I'm trying to explain here is, is that. | 00:48:31 | |
| What ELLERS has tried to demonstrate with the property taxes tailing off is that you will have. | 00:48:36 | |
| Flexibility or ability to take on that. | 00:48:42 | |
| That 22 million. | 00:48:45 | |
| Dollars in the future? | 00:48:46 | |
| If that makes sense. | 00:48:48 | |
| And the difference in just to. | 00:48:49 | |
| To one other thought to and I'll. I'll be quiet after that. | 00:48:52 | |
| Is you could go out for referendum today if you wanted to and you know that you need to cover roads, there's $11 million worth of | 00:48:56 | |
| extra roads and, and just put it on on the tax levy and. | 00:49:02 | |
| Great. | 00:49:09 | |
| The the thing about that is those that it's going to create this big jump. | 00:49:11 | |
| In taxes in 11-GO. | 00:49:15 | |
| By using financing. | 00:49:18 | |
| You're kind of ratcheting up. | 00:49:20 | |
| To that and then on the back end, that's the time policy wise, philosophy wise you'd want to think about, well maybe we don't want | 00:49:22 | |
| to do debt service anymore for roads. We really need to cover this. | 00:49:28 | |
| It needs to be a part of our operations. And then and then you go to referendum and you say, hey, it's not going to increase your | 00:49:35 | |
| taxes because. | 00:49:39 | |
| Our debt service is falling off and you could. | 00:49:43 | |
| You could plan for that, if you will. | 00:49:46 | |
| But that's. | 00:49:49 | |
| That's that. | 00:49:50 | |
| Financial planning and. | 00:49:51 | |
| Some philosophy and. | 00:49:53 | |
| Policy discussions that you're going to have to. | 00:49:54 | |
| Make in the future. | 00:49:56 | |
| I just. | 00:50:00 | |
| And you know, I absolutely. | 00:50:01 | |
| Miller 8 and discussion on a $300,000 home or whatever it is because that same $300,000 home. | 00:50:05 | |
| Has increased in value to 318,000. | 00:50:12 | |
| Now certainly I'm a smart enough man to know that the assessment. | 00:50:16 | |
| Doesn't change. | 00:50:20 | |
| But the allocation based on equalized value is going to be higher for that community or that municipality and the portion of the | 00:50:21 | |
| taxes are going to be assigned to that $300,000 home is going to go up by that same 6%. | 00:50:28 | |
| OK, so taxes don't go down? | 00:50:35 | |
| It's the fallacy. | 00:50:38 | |
| Right. | 00:50:39 | |
| That that mill rate somehow or another makes my taxes go down. It doesn't. The only reason that mill rate went down is because my | 00:50:40 | |
| property value went up. | 00:50:44 | |
| So I, I, I, I hate the premise that we start talking mill rate and somehow or another your taxes are going down because the mill | 00:50:49 | |
| rate went down. The mill rate didn't go down. | 00:50:54 | |
| But I mean, the, the, the levy goes down now we're talking some serious business, right? | 00:50:59 | |
| And this is not Levy going down, this is debt Levy. This is. | 00:51:04 | |
| I I even if. | 00:51:09 | |
| If that chart were to be true, and then, you know, the only reason that that Levy is going to go down is because, you know, you | 00:51:11 | |
| stop borrowing, but I have no clue what you're going to do come 2032. | 00:51:16 | |
| Because you're going to be a $22 million hole. | 00:51:21 | |
| In your budget? | 00:51:24 | |
| That you're going to have to fix. | 00:51:26 | |
| Once we start taking 22 million unless you do the 22 million. | 00:51:29 | |
| Over. | 00:51:34 | |
| 20 years. | 00:51:35 | |
| The length of the bonding. | 00:51:36 | |
| Or if it's ten I. | 00:51:38 | |
| If I can see the chart again if it was a 10 year thing. | 00:51:40 | |
| Then it would be 5 years, right? | 00:51:43 | |
| It would be 10 years. | 00:51:45 | |
| Back one. | 00:51:51 | |
| So it's 10 years. | 00:51:53 | |
| So after. | 00:51:54 | |
| 20 years. | 00:51:55 | |
| If you did 22 million over. | 00:51:57 | |
| 10 years, when one falls off, the other one would come on. | 00:51:59 | |
| But you you'd have to do it that way. But you you'd have to absorb. | 00:52:04 | |
| The bonding, the the the cost of those bonds. | 00:52:08 | |
| Ultimately. | 00:52:12 | |
| It's a $220 million borrowing. | 00:52:13 | |
| In in my eyes. | 00:52:15 | |
| And we, we need to start to make cuts, serious cuts. | 00:52:18 | |
| That are. | 00:52:23 | |
| Long term. | 00:52:25 | |
| OK. | 00:52:26 | |
| That not these band aids. We've we've we've had band aids too long Arpa. | 00:52:27 | |
| Hid this problem. | 00:52:31 | |
| It really did. | 00:52:33 | |
| And now we need to. | 00:52:35 | |
| To find money. | 00:52:37 | |
| To do our roads. | 00:52:38 | |
| We haven't made cuts. | 00:52:42 | |
| I I haven't heard the presentation where you said these are the things that you said. You made a few cuts. | 00:52:44 | |
| But. | 00:52:48 | |
| I don't know what those cuts are in the budget because I can't identify them in the paperwork. It's not in the narrative. | 00:52:49 | |
| But we need sustainable long term cuts. | 00:52:55 | |
| That aren't supported by. | 00:52:58 | |
| Debt service levy. | 00:53:01 | |
| This is I mean if I'm. | 00:53:03 | |
| If I'm right, you got $131 million in borrowing here over the next six years. | 00:53:05 | |
| Am I correct? | 00:53:10 | |
| That's what you're proposing. | 00:53:12 | |
| Yeah, but in some of its twenty year bond and some of its 10 year bond, but. | 00:53:14 | |
| All told that. | 00:53:19 | |
| It's probably 3 to 4 million a year. You're going to add 10% to the levy. | 00:53:20 | |
| Right. I mean our levees 37 million, this is going to be about 4 million a year. | 00:53:26 | |
| What gets adding to the added to the levy is. | 00:53:34 | |
| Not to the, not to our levy. This will be a debt service levy which would be on top of it. | 00:53:37 | |
| But it still would be what, like 4 million? | 00:53:42 | |
| Yep. | 00:53:45 | |
| Debt service levy, but well, yeah, actually it's going to 9 million a year. | 00:53:47 | |
| Ramps up tonight. | 00:53:52 | |
| Ramps up the 9 million. | 00:53:55 | |
| So our current levies at what, 3637? | 00:53:56 | |
| So it's a 25% increase? | 00:54:00 | |
| That's what people are going to see, a 25% increase. You can put it in little dollars and stuff like that, but you know the. | 00:54:03 | |
| The value of a home increases over those same 10 years. | 00:54:09 | |
| So that $300,000 home over 10 years at 5% a year certainly is no longer worth. | 00:54:13 | |
| $300,000 You can't keep that column static and then increase all the other ones. | 00:54:18 | |
| That's why the tax rate shown. You can do the math as the. | 00:54:24 | |
| Home value increases you apply the tax rate per. | 00:54:27 | |
| 100,000 of value and you can see how that changes, but it's pretty easy for me to say if our taxes are. | 00:54:31 | |
| $36 million levy and we're going to add 9 million. That's the 25% increase. | 00:54:36 | |
| That's what people are going to see. | 00:54:41 | |
| It happens. | 00:54:43 | |
| That's the math that. | 00:54:45 | |
| Shows up on. | 00:54:46 | |
| My tax bill. | 00:54:47 | |
| In in response to some of that. | 00:54:56 | |
| The. | 00:54:59 | |
| Property goes up 300 to 300,000. | 00:55:00 | |
| From 180 that it was 10 years ago. | 00:55:04 | |
| And as a percent of your value of your tax of your property, your taxes are. | 00:55:07 | |
| Are no higher than they were before. | 00:55:13 | |
| That's fallacy. | 00:55:16 | |
| The allocation to the municipality increases based on that equalized value. | 00:55:18 | |
| Supervisor Durer. | 00:55:25 | |
| I wanted to clarify. | 00:55:27 | |
| I mean, all the folks up here understand this, but I just want to clarify that. | 00:55:30 | |
| Basic. | 00:55:34 | |
| Definitions of infrastructure include. | 00:55:35 | |
| Physical things that go into the future. | 00:55:38 | |
| Structure. | 00:55:42 | |
| That. | 00:55:43 | |
| Roads is like the number one thing that would be called infrastructure. | 00:55:44 | |
| Railroads. | 00:55:49 | |
| Bridges. | 00:55:50 | |
| Water systems. Power grids. | 00:55:52 | |
| There's other things like there are soft infrastructure. | 00:55:55 | |
| Which are sort of pseudo. | 00:55:58 | |
| Services like education. | 00:56:00 | |
| Et cetera, right. So we're talking about municipal finance for hard. | 00:56:03 | |
| Basic. | 00:56:07 | |
| Every. | 00:56:09 | |
| Almost every municipality has. | 00:56:12 | |
| Funding to get it done. | 00:56:14 | |
| Municipal funding and they do municipal bonds and it. | 00:56:16 | |
| And the most? | 00:56:19 | |
| Core reason. | 00:56:21 | |
| Obviously, generally used is for. | 00:56:22 | |
| Hard infrastructure. | 00:56:25 | |
| So this is what what they said before was true. You want to just, you want to just have the do a referendum and then have the tax. | 00:56:27 | |
| In one year like. | 00:56:35 | |
| Boy would we get the calls right. So this is the. | 00:56:37 | |
| Prudent. | 00:56:40 | |
| Financially stable way. | 00:56:41 | |
| To do this. | 00:56:43 | |
| Supervisor Guckenberger. | 00:56:47 | |
| I'm sorry, I need to clarify something. So if we do a referendum. | 00:56:49 | |
| Then the entire bond would be paid off in one year. | 00:56:53 | |
| Or, well, then it wouldn't be. | 00:56:57 | |
| Skyrocketing one year. I mean you would still do a tenure or 20 year note. | 00:56:59 | |
| And you would amortize that? | 00:57:04 | |
| Payment over a longer period of time. | 00:57:06 | |
| Sure, it's going to skyrocket, but no different than any of these numbers up here are going to make it skyrocket if you borrow 22 | 00:57:09 | |
| million. | 00:57:12 | |
| It it's the same thing. | 00:57:15 | |
| Right, unless you say we're going to borrow $100 million in this said referendum. | 00:57:17 | |
| Yes, I think yes. | 00:57:23 | |
| You nailed it at the end there, OK. | 00:57:26 | |
| Supervisor Sigmund. | 00:57:31 | |
| Thank you. | 00:57:34 | |
| Why are we set on this 22 mile? | 00:57:38 | |
| Number. | 00:57:41 | |
| It's not necessary. | 00:57:43 | |
| We could lower that. You only require 7 million a year. | 00:57:44 | |
| Roads, again, are not. | 00:57:48 | |
| The hard infrastructure that we need to borrow for, like a water tower. | 00:57:51 | |
| Are you going to build a water tower every year? Are you going to work on the water tower every year? How about administration | 00:57:56 | |
| building? I mean, every year of the year we're going to do something to administration building. | 00:58:01 | |
| Roads are happening every year. | 00:58:06 | |
| Let's budget for them and do it. | 00:58:08 | |
| In a way that. | 00:58:10 | |
| This is not so aggressive because it's over. | 00:58:11 | |
| Done right now. | 00:58:15 | |
| And that's what's killing us. | 00:58:16 | |
| Cuts. I've heard that there are no cuts. | 00:58:19 | |
| Or very little. Very few. | 00:58:21 | |
| What services would we really lose? | 00:58:24 | |
| If we lost. | 00:58:27 | |
| 10% of our employees. | 00:58:29 | |
| I'm not saying we're going to do that, but just think of it. | 00:58:32 | |
| If 10% of our employees, I mean since 2020, we have gone from 750 employees to. | 00:58:34 | |
| 900. | 00:58:41 | |
| Or what is his last number, 875 to 900? | 00:58:42 | |
| That I just saw tonight. | 00:58:46 | |
| A few months ago I was told by. | 00:58:48 | |
| Our administrator. We were at 1000. | 00:58:50 | |
| But if any of that one quite right, but. | 00:58:52 | |
| We have increased. | 00:58:54 | |
| Almost 20%. | 00:58:56 | |
| In our employee numbers. | 00:58:58 | |
| Has our services increased by 20%? | 00:59:00 | |
| To a population that is level and stagnant and aging. | 00:59:03 | |
| Yes, but so do 20%. | 00:59:08 | |
| More people come to the. | 00:59:11 | |
| Buildings here and get services. | 00:59:14 | |
| I think. | 00:59:17 | |
| We have to look seriously at that. | 00:59:17 | |
| I've also heard that as far as. | 00:59:21 | |
| Cost of living adjustment goes. | 00:59:23 | |
| There is many counties that won't go above 3. | 00:59:26 | |
| Period. And if they go above 2. | 00:59:28 | |
| They require some staff reduction. | 00:59:31 | |
| If you want more than two. | 00:59:33 | |
| I mean. | 00:59:35 | |
| I guess the question is who? | 00:59:37 | |
| Who was consulted to? | 00:59:39 | |
| Find out what parameters are needed here at Dodge County to make us a leader. | 00:59:41 | |
| Of all the counties in excellence. | 00:59:46 | |
| I mean, I haven't made all the meetings, but I don't recall a conversation on what are we going to do here at Dodge County to. | 00:59:50 | |
| Lift us up to the top to. | 00:59:56 | |
| Make us an example of what we believe is. | 00:59:58 | |
| Level of excellence. | 01:00:02 | |
| Debt. We're going to borrow ourselves into prosperity. | 01:00:05 | |
| As a previous supervisor had mentioned. | 01:00:10 | |
| I think you can always present numbers in a way that looked. | 01:00:12 | |
| Good. | 01:00:16 | |
| But it's not always. | 01:00:18 | |
| Correct. | 01:00:19 | |
| So let's reconsider the roads. | 01:00:21 | |
| Let's just budget for them every year and do them and you won't see a jump every year because it's going to be a constant. And if | 01:00:23 | |
| we have to cut something, let's really seriously think about cutting some. | 01:00:28 | |
| That's what we do. | 01:00:34 | |
| The real world. | 01:00:35 | |
| Out here. | 01:00:36 | |
| Thanks. | 01:00:37 | |
| Supervisor Houchin. | 01:00:40 | |
| Thank you. | 01:00:41 | |
| As I. | 01:00:43 | |
| I've spent quite a bit of time on this budget and looking through it and. | 01:00:44 | |
| One thing that bothers me year after year after year. | 01:00:47 | |
| It's always we have to have money for roads. Why isn't that considered first? | 01:00:50 | |
| Why do we have to leave it to the end and then say oh. | 01:00:54 | |
| We don't have any money for roads when we know we have to have money for roads. | 01:00:57 | |
| And I think that's a failure in making the budget. | 01:01:01 | |
| That roads aren't a priority to start with. | 01:01:04 | |
| And then you can figure out. | 01:01:07 | |
| Well, maybe I don't need this, or I don't need that. | 01:01:08 | |
| We know Rhodes is something that's served. | 01:01:11 | |
| Everybody in the county. | 01:01:13 | |
| And more than some of our other services, Not that they aren't important too, but wrote. | 01:01:16 | |
| Everyone in the county has to use a Rd. | 01:01:21 | |
| To go somewhere. | 01:01:24 | |
| And we always leave it and I think that's a failure when we make the budget. | 01:01:26 | |
| That we do not. | 01:01:30 | |
| Look for roads first. Now as I've looked through this and I think we're going to, are we going to talk about specifics? | 01:01:32 | |
| Tonight. | 01:01:38 | |
| Yes. So right now. | 01:01:39 | |
| This is Q&A on the specific details. | 01:01:40 | |
| That were provided by Ellers if you have questions about. | 01:01:43 | |
| What they presented. | 01:01:47 | |
| Want to know where it came from? | 01:01:48 | |
| Why we're talking about it, That's what this part is, OK? | 01:01:50 | |
| And then? | 01:01:53 | |
| Following that presentation and and allowing for the discussion that's happened a little bit in advance of that. | 01:01:54 | |
| But this discussion. | 01:01:59 | |
| Then we're going to finish presenting specifics on the budget. | 01:02:01 | |
| And then I will talk more. | 01:02:04 | |
| Thank you. | 01:02:07 | |
| Thank you, Supervisor. | 01:02:08 | |
| Thank you. Mr. Chairman. I don't have a questions to make a statement, so I'll just hold my statement so we can move things along | 01:02:11 | |
| tonight. | 01:02:14 | |
| Supervisor Derr. | 01:02:19 | |
| I apologize I don't remember the number but like. | 01:02:23 | |
| Over 3/4 probably of our budget is mandated by the state of Wisconsin so that's why we don't do roads first. | 01:02:26 | |
| Because we have to provide jail services, should we cut 20% of that? We have Human Services. We're finally fully staffed. | 01:02:33 | |
| We're providing all kinds of required services. | 01:02:40 | |
| And in the statute, you know so many clients per social worker. | 01:02:44 | |
| And I mean, that's just required. | 01:02:48 | |
| It's across the board. | 01:02:50 | |
| So what are we going to cut the non mandated? We're going to cut all preventative? | 01:02:53 | |
| Care for families so that in 12 years it's just a gigantic cluster. Are we going to just completely stop taking care of our parks? | 01:02:58 | |
| The truth is the. | 01:03:08 | |
| Overwhelming majority of our budget is out of our control. | 01:03:09 | |
| It's mandated. | 01:03:13 | |
| By the state. | 01:03:14 | |
| Supervisor Guckenberger. | 01:03:17 | |
| Thank you, Mr. Chairman. | 01:03:20 | |
| Cameron, if you'd be so kind, just go to your budget CPI adjusted revenues. | 01:03:23 | |
| I mean, it was up there. It's that little chart that shows charges for services. | 01:03:27 | |
| This. | 01:03:33 | |
| I don't know, maybe go up 1? | 01:03:36 | |
| Chart Bar chart. | 01:03:38 | |
| Yes. What? Down, down 1? | 01:03:40 | |
| Right here. | 01:03:42 | |
| Yeah, OK. | 01:03:43 | |
| So I don't disagree that cutting. | 01:03:45 | |
| In these areas where we charge for services. | 01:03:50 | |
| Even based on your chart, you know where you said the dark green and we you know we can't cut because we generate. | 01:03:53 | |
| Revenue. | 01:03:58 | |
| But you do realize that there's just. | 01:03:59 | |
| Three main areas where we're generating all of our revenue and I'm not, I would never have to Cate. | 01:04:02 | |
| Cutting services in those areas. | 01:04:07 | |
| But we have a lot of other areas. | 01:04:10 | |
| In which we could cut services. | 01:04:13 | |
| Potentially, right? | 01:04:15 | |
| So, you know, I, I think it's disingenuous to say we can't cut. | 01:04:17 | |
| Because we're generating revenue. | 01:04:23 | |
| When I see, you know, clearly you know Clearview, I wouldn't advocate cutting staff there. We do generate revenue. | 01:04:25 | |
| I don't see the Sheriff's Office up there, at least it doesn't appear to be, unless that 4.6 million constitutes. | 01:04:32 | |
| The Sheriff's Office. | 01:04:38 | |
| OK. And Health and Human Services, I suspect most of those revenues or charges for services are coming from grants? | 01:04:39 | |
| Right. | 01:04:46 | |
| Because I don't believe we actually charge for services to the end user. | 01:04:47 | |
| But in those areas. | 01:04:51 | |
| I agree. | 01:04:54 | |
| There's there's no opportunity to cut. | 01:04:55 | |
| But that's only three departments out of, you know, 20 some departments in our organization. | 01:04:58 | |
| So. | 01:05:05 | |
| I don't think it's fair to come into this room and say that there's no place to cut. | 01:05:07 | |
| There's OK. | 01:05:13 | |
| Every. Every. | 01:05:15 | |
| Day by day progress. | 01:05:17 | |
| Personal enrichment, growth. We figure out things. This is true. | 01:05:18 | |
| And so there's always probably something that could be done, but what I'm telling you with resources I have right now. | 01:05:22 | |
| I I think that would be a. | 01:05:29 | |
| Poor choice when we're talking about those three large departments, those three large departments draw on. | 01:05:30 | |
| All of the services. | 01:05:35 | |
| Held in. | 01:05:37 | |
| General Administration. | 01:05:38 | |
| So when we're talking about what their charges for services and their function if we were to at the same vein talk about. | 01:05:40 | |
| Any reductions to general administration? | 01:05:46 | |
| We have to take into account the fact that that's going to reduce the quality of the service for which they're getting charged. | 01:05:49 | |
| They're charging and getting revenue. | 01:05:55 | |
| So there's there's, there's nothing is. | 01:05:57 | |
| Everything's tied together. | 01:06:01 | |
| So that's all I want to say about that. | 01:06:02 | |
| But. | 01:06:04 | |
| Well, yeah, I don't know. That was the last question for now. Go ahead. Please do. | 01:06:08 | |
| Just just one more point that that you probably don't it. It's not representative in this in this chart. | 01:06:14 | |
| But you can see in 20 and 21 that there's kind of a jump, right? | 01:06:20 | |
| If we looked at just the. | 01:06:25 | |
| You know the adjusted. | 01:06:27 | |
| That gives you the trend, that tells you that you had a change, you had a policy change in those years. | 01:06:29 | |
| And that policy change was capital improvements. | 01:06:36 | |
| It was investment in roads. | 01:06:39 | |
| And so. | 01:06:42 | |
| The the fact is is. | 01:06:43 | |
| Your revenue hasn't grown. | 01:06:44 | |
| Especially in. | 01:06:47 | |
| Terms of property tax. | 01:06:48 | |
| Hasn't grown to cover the expenses. | 01:06:49 | |
| And so now you're up against. | 01:06:52 | |
| You're you're, you're seeing the gap. | 01:06:54 | |
| You're feeling that gap and and it's real and I don't. | 01:06:56 | |
| I'm not trying to be disingenuous at all. This is. | 01:06:59 | |
| This is a real. | 01:07:03 | |
| Policy problem that you're you're needing to face. | 01:07:03 | |
| But I think that it's it's wise for us to see. | 01:07:07 | |
| The history and understand the history. | 01:07:10 | |
| And so in 2017 to 2020. | 01:07:13 | |
| You had a certain level of service. | 01:07:16 | |
| It was all operations. | 01:07:18 | |
| And then in 20 and 21. | 01:07:20 | |
| You decided, you know what, we want to start investing in more capital projects. | 01:07:22 | |
| Part of that was with ARPA. | 01:07:26 | |
| But part of it was just philosophy change too. I'm. | 01:07:28 | |
| I'm I wasn't here, but that's what I'm presuming I'm. | 01:07:31 | |
| Giving the benefit of the doubt that that was. | 01:07:35 | |
| That was the thought process. | 01:07:38 | |
| One other comment just on the 22 or changing your standard for 22 miles to let's say you upped it, you only replaced roads at 30 | 01:07:40 | |
| miles or every 30 years. | 01:07:46 | |
| They delta in that is $2,000,000. | 01:07:51 | |
| About. | 01:07:54 | |
| So instead of $10 million, you're now spending $8 million. | 01:07:56 | |
| But you still have an $8 million gap that you're going to need to cover. | 01:08:00 | |
| And so. | 01:08:04 | |
| Anyway. | 01:08:05 | |
| The 22 mile Rd. | 01:08:09 | |
| Actually is on a 25 year. | 01:08:11 | |
| Yes, thank you Basis. | 01:08:14 | |
| So you'd be cutting. | 01:08:16 | |
| You'd be going to 30 years from 25, correct? Sorry. | 01:08:18 | |
| Supervisor Supervisor Krause. | 01:08:22 | |
| So I. | 01:08:24 | |
| I'm not opposed to borrowing for some roads. | 01:08:25 | |
| I mean. | 01:08:28 | |
| We need to, we need to keep them up. | 01:08:29 | |
| Updated. | 01:08:31 | |
| The longer they go, the worse they're going to get. | 01:08:32 | |
| It's going to cost more to fix. | 01:08:34 | |
| We have inflation. | 01:08:36 | |
| And the ideas? | 01:08:38 | |
| And I respect everyone's opinions but the idea of cutting back and they do maybe 15 miles a road or. | 01:08:39 | |
| 10 miles a road a year will also affect their transportation aid. | 01:08:45 | |
| So if we're going to cut there, we're going to lose. | 01:08:49 | |
| Transportation aid also, so I think it's something else that we need to consider. | 01:08:51 | |
| Thank you. Thank you. | 01:08:54 | |
| OK, let's go ahead. | 01:08:57 | |
| All right, if there are no more questions for Ehlers, this is. | 01:09:00 | |
| Food for thought. | 01:09:04 | |
| And again. | 01:09:06 | |
| Talk more after. Thank you. | 01:09:08 | |
| Gentlemen. | 01:09:09 | |
| So. | 01:09:11 | |
| Borrowing dollars is one of the alternatives I want to go back to. | 01:09:12 | |
| Just share. | 01:09:18 | |
| From what was. | 01:09:19 | |
| Discussed tonight. | 01:09:20 | |
| OK, here we go. | 01:09:24 | |
| Trouble with the mouse. | 01:09:27 | |
| Maybe it push? | 01:09:32 | |
| Points to or relates to what? | 01:09:34 | |
| What Nathan was just sharing. | 01:09:37 | |
| But when you look at these. | 01:09:39 | |
| This. | 01:09:41 | |
| Arrangement of. | 01:09:42 | |
| Revenues and the percentages. | 01:09:44 | |
| Of the whole that each one is. | 01:09:47 | |
| When we're talking about cutting. | 01:09:50 | |
| We're talking about 22% of the overall. | 01:09:52 | |
| Our overall expense. | 01:09:56 | |
| $0.20 on the dollar is what we're talking about cutting. | 01:09:58 | |
| I know that. | 01:10:01 | |
| We're dealing with a little bit of an increase. | 01:10:03 | |
| If we talk about financing. | 01:10:05 | |
| Through borrowing dollars. | 01:10:08 | |
| But it's. | 01:10:10 | |
| No matter what. | 01:10:11 | |
| We do. | 01:10:12 | |
| We have to do something to cover that gap as. | 01:10:14 | |
| Mentioned. | 01:10:17 | |
| And. | 01:10:18 | |
| We're dealing with the percentage that will go up, but. | 01:10:20 | |
| Marginally. | 01:10:24 | |
| Compared to the other. | 01:10:25 | |
| To the other costs. | 01:10:27 | |
| I would expect. | 01:10:28 | |
| We'll have numbers we can provide more refined, A more refined presentation of what? | 01:10:29 | |
| The cost impact would be. | 01:10:34 | |
| And in later meetings, and I've taken some notes from what's been discussed today to make sure we do that. | 01:10:36 | |
| But to this point I guess. | 01:10:42 | |
| I would just move on to. | 01:10:44 | |
| Going back to. | 01:10:46 | |
| The presentation and moving on to the next part. | 01:10:48 | |
| And really? | 01:10:51 | |
| For the sake of time we've gone through. | 01:10:53 | |
| In the past and discussed. | 01:10:57 | |
| Where we're, where we're pulling dollars from. Maybe I'll just share it so we can see. Just a reminder of where dollars are coming | 01:10:59 | |
| from. | 01:11:02 | |
| To fund our priorities. | 01:11:06 | |
| OK, I'm not going to go through, but you can see the numbers there. | 01:11:07 | |
| And we talked about things that were unfunded. | 01:11:13 | |
| Mentioning again the roads Nathan rounded up. I'm rounding down. But the point is. | 01:11:17 | |
| That between 10 and 11,000,000 is what you're going to be looking at every every year if we continue the course we're on. | 01:11:22 | |
| For road construction and that's. | 01:11:28 | |
| Taking out of the. | 01:11:31 | |
| Mixture any. | 01:11:32 | |
| Savings from. | 01:11:33 | |
| An innovation that comes along or. | 01:11:35 | |
| A really good. | 01:11:38 | |
| Borrowing rate in the future and how that impacts the layers of. | 01:11:40 | |
| Of cost into the borrowing if there if we did one. | 01:11:44 | |
| But again. | 01:11:50 | |
| When we look at. | 01:11:51 | |
| Where we are. | 01:11:52 | |
| Compared to some other. | 01:11:53 | |
| Oh, excuse me. | 01:11:56 | |
| Before that slide. | 01:11:57 | |
| Look at where we are compared to our goals overall. | 01:11:58 | |
| For Dodge County. | 01:12:02 | |
| These are the I'm just. | 01:12:03 | |
| Coming back to the. | 01:12:04 | |
| The piece about. | 01:12:06 | |
| Excuse me? | 01:12:07 | |
| Our strategic plan or the strategic plan that you all worked on and approved? | 01:12:09 | |
| And set up. | 01:12:13 | |
| These are the areas of focus. | 01:12:15 | |
| And as. | 01:12:17 | |
| True to what's been talked about tonight, the highways are a big part of that. | 01:12:18 | |
| The roadways are huge. | 01:12:21 | |
| And we need to take care of them. I will say it was mentioned earlier, why don't we start and I. | 01:12:24 | |
| I know I don't want to listen. | 01:12:30 | |
| Supervisor Sigmund So. | 01:12:31 | |
| Doesn't always mean agreement, it just means under understanding. | 01:12:33 | |
| But I will tell you that. | 01:12:36 | |
| I would love to start. | 01:12:39 | |
| Like that in a budget process, but. | 01:12:41 | |
| It was mentioned I think Supervisor Derr and maybe others but. | 01:12:43 | |
| We don't have necessarily that luxury. | 01:12:47 | |
| Our dollar amount that we have to work with, there's lots of different dollars that have different restrictions. | 01:12:49 | |
| And as I mentioned already. | 01:12:55 | |
| With. | 01:12:57 | |
| Everything relates, so we could say roads, but. | 01:12:59 | |
| Then what we can do about? | 01:13:04 | |
| All these other costs that are tied to taking care of the people and or the other resources that are used to take care of those | 01:13:05 | |
| roads. | 01:13:09 | |
| So that's the pickle. | 01:13:13 | |
| With. | 01:13:14 | |
| With that is there's there's just a little bit more complication than. | 01:13:16 | |
| Then I'm sure it looks like. | 01:13:20 | |
| From from this end. | 01:13:22 | |
| So with that. | 01:13:23 | |
| I've written down a number of things from what's been shared in comments. | 01:13:26 | |
| That I would. I think most of that is. | 01:13:30 | |
| Information I. | 01:13:33 | |
| Can respond to in a communication if if needed. | 01:13:34 | |
| The one thing I will say about. | 01:13:39 | |
| Value and dollars. | 01:13:41 | |
| And is just. | 01:13:44 | |
| Open air for everyone is. | 01:13:46 | |
| How much did a? | 01:13:48 | |
| Bottle of Coca-Cola cost when you were a kid. | 01:13:49 | |
| And. | 01:13:54 | |
| We're not inflating or having trouble with performance or function. | 01:13:55 | |
| Anymore than Coca-Cola is. | 01:13:59 | |
| Today, yeah. | 01:14:01 | |
| But uh. | 01:14:02 | |
| I know that I pay more for a bottle of Coca-Cola today. | 01:14:03 | |
| Than I did with my dad as a little kid walking down the street to the gas station. | 01:14:06 | |
| And it's not because I'm in Wisconsin instead of Michigan. And it's not because Coca-Cola is less efficient. | 01:14:10 | |
| Or needs to cut something? | 01:14:16 | |
| It's because Coca-Cola costs more. | 01:14:18 | |
| That's all I'm going to say about that. | 01:14:21 | |
| So with that. | 01:14:23 | |
| Now we have the budget. | 01:14:25 | |
| And tada the book so. | 01:14:27 | |
| I've shared a bunch of information, I'm happy to answer any questions about that. | 01:14:31 | |
| But if you had questions about specifically the budget document. | 01:14:34 | |
| I know Supervisor Houchin also has. | 01:14:38 | |
| It takes and dedicates time to looking through the specific line item detail of the reports and we've talked and had a good | 01:14:41 | |
| conversation about that. I have that document I believe here available as well. | 01:14:47 | |
| So. | 01:14:53 | |
| Any what other questions do you all have about the budget? Are you going to address the ones that were sent in first or? | 01:14:55 | |
| So I can the only ones that. | 01:15:03 | |
| That I took time to. | 01:15:06 | |
| Address were the ones I sent in that e-mail on Saturday. | 01:15:08 | |
| So are you talking about those, Mr. Chair? OK. | 01:15:12 | |
| I know that. | 01:15:15 | |
| And thank you to those that have had questions and have called and talked with. | 01:15:16 | |
| Finance staff or others to get your answers. | 01:15:19 | |
| And thank you to the Finance and other staff and Human Services and elsewhere for answering those. | 01:15:22 | |
| So yes, how much do we charge private owners for the airport hangars to exist on airport land? | 01:15:28 | |
| I mentioned that finance team is looking into this or will be looking into this. | 01:15:34 | |
| To evaluate rent fees. | 01:15:38 | |
| I wonder if there's if I should turn anytime to Mackenzie or Nathan to talk about that. Do you have anything now that you would be | 01:15:40 | |
| prepared to share? It's OK if you don't. We can continue. | 01:15:45 | |
| Working on this. | 01:15:50 | |
| Nothing. The one thing I. | 01:15:55 | |
| One thing I can share is that the hangar. | 01:15:57 | |
| Contracts are 20. | 01:16:00 | |
| Leases. | 01:16:01 | |
| And so the ability to. | 01:16:02 | |
| To change them is somewhat limited, but moving forward that is something that. | 01:16:05 | |
| That, uh. | 01:16:09 | |
| The support the supervisors could could consider as a or. | 01:16:10 | |
| We can consider as a. | 01:16:14 | |
| A rental fee increase. | 01:16:16 | |
| Yeah. Thank you. | 01:16:18 | |
| Thank you. | 01:16:20 | |
| Supervisor Keel. | 01:16:22 | |
| I was just going to. | 01:16:24 | |
| Say that. | 01:16:26 | |
| The leases we had for airport hangars in my past. | 01:16:27 | |
| Work we. | 01:16:32 | |
| Had an escalator inflation. | 01:16:34 | |
| Amount in for like every five years or something. | 01:16:36 | |
| So I was just saying. | 01:16:40 | |
| To look around and see what others have. | 01:16:42 | |
| Thank you. | 01:16:46 | |
| Supervised game to Sandy. | 01:16:47 | |
| I think we pay $0.11 a square foot. | 01:16:50 | |
| Now it's been that way since 2022. | 01:16:53 | |
| I think we have 44. | 01:16:56 | |
| Leasable lots, I think we leased 40 of them. | 01:16:59 | |
| And it's like $3100 a year and it's like 70. | 01:17:02 | |
| $70 a year. | 01:17:06 | |
| Other other airports are. | 01:17:10 | |
| Waukesha is at $0.27 a square foot. | 01:17:15 | |
| I think Watertown was. | 01:17:19 | |
| Had gone up in there like 13 cents a square foot, but. | 01:17:23 | |
| They all varied and I think they. | 01:17:27 | |
| Figure in like a 3% increase of your. | 01:17:31 | |
| Supervisor Steger. | 01:17:36 | |
| Thank you, Mr. Chairman. | 01:17:38 | |
| 20 year lease on a hangar. | 01:17:41 | |
| I would assume that they do have an escalating. | 01:17:44 | |
| Fee each year or. | 01:17:48 | |
| Increase in cost. | 01:17:51 | |
| According to. | 01:17:52 | |
| Inflation. | 01:17:53 | |
| Or is it a 20 year lease at one set price? | 01:17:55 | |
| I can't speak to that. | 01:18:00 | |
| And I don't know if we have staff that can, but. | 01:18:01 | |
| Brian might be able to answer is gonna say. | 01:18:03 | |
| This is actually. | 01:18:06 | |
| The last. | 01:18:07 | |
| The last? Well, no. | 01:18:08 | |
| We have the public hearing on the 30th. | 01:18:09 | |
| But otherwise, the last time you'll have the privilege here and from our highway commissioner, so. | 01:18:12 | |
| Brian, can you add, thank you insight on the insight on this? Yeah, the the releases were re. | 01:18:16 | |
| Reevaluated in 2022 by the Highway Committee. | 01:18:22 | |
| Rents were reviewed. | 01:18:26 | |
| With like airports. | 01:18:28 | |
| And we were found to what we said it at was a little higher than the average. | 01:18:30 | |
| Hadn't been visited in a while. Some of the differences in hangar lease costs are. | 01:18:34 | |
| What do you offer as an airport? | 01:18:40 | |
| If you compare to Waukesha or Watertown and they have sewer and water service to their hangar lots significant difference from | 01:18:42 | |
| what Juno has to offer. | 01:18:47 | |
| So I think if you want to compare. | 01:18:51 | |
| Lot lease rates. | 01:18:54 | |
| You need to compare to like airports. | 01:18:56 | |
| We're in the ballpark. It can be adjusted. It's a 20 year lease, but. | 01:19:00 | |
| There is an opportunity to adjust rates as necessary. | 01:19:04 | |
| Throughout the course of that 20 years. | 01:19:07 | |
| And I think that can be done, but it shouldn't be done. | 01:19:09 | |
| Arbitrarily, it has to be done with some. | 01:19:12 | |
| A logical, fair approach. | 01:19:15 | |
| And there are more than. | 01:19:17 | |
| 15. | 01:19:20 | |
| Hanger lots available today so we're not saturated with tenants and. | 01:19:21 | |
| And. | 01:19:25 | |
| I think for today it's probably in a good place, but could we revisit it? | 01:19:27 | |
| In a year or two for a. | 01:19:31 | |
| Potential rate increase. | 01:19:32 | |
| At any rate, that's not a big revenue generator. Never will be. | 01:19:34 | |
| They're 3 to $700.00 a lot. | 01:19:38 | |
| I think it's important to understand that the county leases the. | 01:19:43 | |
| The the ground, they don't lease the building. The building is owned by the individual and they're so sold and and exchanged on a | 01:19:46 | |
| regular basis. | 01:19:50 | |
| But it's never going to be a great revenue generator. The egg land generates more. Obviously you visited that month or so ago. | 01:19:55 | |
| I made some adjustments there. | 01:20:03 | |
| There is an opportunity, I think for more growth at the airport with some. | 01:20:05 | |
| Business potential. | 01:20:10 | |
| There's several. | 01:20:12 | |
| People right now talking to me about. | 01:20:13 | |
| Wanting to develop business hangars out there. | 01:20:16 | |
| Could be a different rate. Of course they want sewer and water, that's got to be considered. | 01:20:18 | |
| That's going to take some heavy lifting on someone's part to recognize. | 01:20:22 | |
| What it might take to have sewer and water on some commercial. | 01:20:26 | |
| Hanger lots, maybe in the front of the field instead of the rear of field. | 01:20:29 | |
| I've recently learned that. | 01:20:33 | |
| All the airports in the area are. | 01:20:35 | |
| They're built out. | 01:20:38 | |
| So suddenly Joan was becoming more attractive. | 01:20:39 | |
| You you may see some real growth in your airport. | 01:20:43 | |
| The next 5 to 10 years, if you are fair minded and aggressive, you might actually see. | 01:20:45 | |
| Some some more benefit to having that airfield out there than you have in the past. | 01:20:51 | |
| Thank you. | 01:20:57 | |
| Thank you, Brian. | 01:20:58 | |
| That's it for now. | 01:21:02 | |
| All right. So I'll continue down the just going over some of these questions. So what new positions were added in 2026? | 01:21:05 | |
| I in my. | 01:21:13 | |
| Message directed everybody to the back pages, so the back pages of the of the document you received. | 01:21:15 | |
| And for those that received it, some of you may have received one with some loose pages. | 01:21:21 | |
| So. | 01:21:26 | |
| The loose pages are. | 01:21:27 | |
| We we found a few things and so we made. | 01:21:29 | |
| They're they're not substantial, but they were. | 01:21:32 | |
| Corrections that were made to the documents, so the loose pages are what you have there. | 01:21:35 | |
| And on the back page of that report. | 01:21:39 | |
| The very last page of that report. | 01:21:41 | |
| Is meant to at a table. | 01:21:44 | |
| Show uh. | 01:21:46 | |
| What's been changed? | 01:21:48 | |
| In terms of. | 01:21:49 | |
| And and the challenge? | 01:21:50 | |
| We're still working on making improvements to the kind of report we might be able to pull out of our. | 01:21:53 | |
| UKG. | 01:21:59 | |
| HRI is system. | 01:22:01 | |
| But it's been, it's been sometimes it is sometimes a challenge. | 01:22:04 | |
| So thankfully for finance folks, you've got the Fte's there listed. | 01:22:08 | |
| That doesn't always. | 01:22:14 | |
| Directly reflect positions, but a lot of times it does. | 01:22:15 | |
| But that's the information that shows what we have for positions. So in talking through what the positions are, I'll just just | 01:22:19 | |
| overview. | 01:22:22 | |
| Numbers we had. | 01:22:27 | |
| As I went through and reviewed. | 01:22:29 | |
| And then confirmed with finance. | 01:22:31 | |
| 17.3. | 01:22:34 | |
| New full-time equivalent. | 01:22:36 | |
| Equivalence. | 01:22:39 | |
| In terms of. | 01:22:40 | |
| Of positions. | 01:22:41 | |
| We have reduced. | 01:22:42 | |
| Or eliminated. | 01:22:44 | |
| 20.45 full-time equivalents. | 01:22:45 | |
| And total non pool meaning those that. | 01:22:48 | |
| Are actually filling a position. | 01:22:52 | |
| Whether it be somebody that's working. | 01:22:54 | |
| 10 hours a week or someone that's working full time. | 01:22:56 | |
| But non pool full-time equivalents. | 01:23:00 | |
| Are 929.66 so to the question earlier that number. | 01:23:03 | |
| Or my. | 01:23:08 | |
| Getting a number versus providing an estimate or recalling. | 01:23:09 | |
| A very general number. Sometimes that has changed. | 01:23:14 | |
| But that number does change and fluctuate as people come in or people leave. | 01:23:17 | |
| But the estimated or anticipated budgeted space. | 01:23:20 | |
| Is 9 point. | 01:23:24 | |
| Or 929.66 full-time equivalents. | 01:23:25 | |
| Pool positions are a little bit different. We have a specific set of hours for those positions and. | 01:23:29 | |
| Every department that has pool positions. | 01:23:34 | |
| They can hire. | 01:23:37 | |
| 100 people for. | 01:23:39 | |
| Each one 4.1 hour if they wanted to. It's it's not really relevant for us. | 01:23:42 | |
| Just as long as the. | 01:23:47 | |
| Total hour amount. | 01:23:48 | |
| Stays the same. So we have a rate of paper, those positions, we have the hours, we know that. | 01:23:50 | |
| We need to fill. | 01:23:54 | |
| And then our departments fill those. So that would be. | 01:23:55 | |
| A big one is is court, but there are also in the Sheriff's Office, there are Human Services and health. | 01:23:59 | |
| And and clear. | 01:24:04 | |
| There are positions like that. | 01:24:06 | |
| So. | 01:24:08 | |
| And other places that I'm. | 01:24:09 | |
| Probably that I'm forgetting. | 01:24:10 | |
| But that was the answer to that question. | 01:24:13 | |
| So. | 01:24:15 | |
| Next is. | 01:24:16 | |
| Here we interest. | 01:24:19 | |
| A question was the art of interest, I believe, right? Yes, yes. | 01:24:21 | |
| So the ARPA interest, I apologize. | 01:24:25 | |
| In my. | 01:24:27 | |
| In my document. | 01:24:28 | |
| Finance. They provided me with a number, I just forgot to include it before I sent it out. So the ARPA interest total right now is | 01:24:31 | |
| $1,069,827. | 01:24:36 | |
| If anybody wants to write that down, I can also resend this with that number in it. | 01:24:41 | |
| But again, yes, so it's. | 01:24:46 | |
| 1,000,000. | 01:24:47 | |
| 69,000. | 01:24:50 | |
| 800. | 01:24:53 | |
| $27. | 01:24:55 | |
| So that is the interest that's been earned. | 01:24:58 | |
| On. | 01:25:01 | |
| On ARPA dollars and that interest. | 01:25:02 | |
| Believe many of you know, but just to. | 01:25:04 | |
| Restate if you don't. | 01:25:06 | |
| So those dollars are not tied. | 01:25:08 | |
| To any of the federal regulations associated with the ARPA program. | 01:25:11 | |
| Those dollars are dollars that. | 01:25:15 | |
| As interest earned. | 01:25:17 | |
| Belong to Dodge County. | 01:25:19 | |
| So we have not directly said we're going to use that 1,069,827. | 01:25:23 | |
| It's not right, it's not singled out as a specific, it's in the balance of funds. | 01:25:28 | |
| So. | 01:25:34 | |
| When you look at fund balances and things like that. | 01:25:34 | |
| It's in there, but it's not pulled out or parsed out. | 01:25:37 | |
| So I think and I know in fact a couple supervisors have talked with me. | 01:25:40 | |
| About those dollars and applying those dollars and we could just as easily state with just apply. | 01:25:45 | |
| $1,069,827.00 of. | 01:25:52 | |
| Fund balance. | 01:25:55 | |
| That's what we would essentially be doing, whether we call it the interest or not, that's where those dollars they sit in the | 01:25:57 | |
| overall. | 01:26:00 | |
| Added together bucket. | 01:26:03 | |
| Does that make sense? Am I speaking out of school? | 01:26:05 | |
| Finance. | 01:26:07 | |
| Folks, OK. | 01:26:08 | |
| The next one did we set aside dollars in the Community Development Fund? We did. | 01:26:11 | |
| So we have about. | 01:26:16 | |
| Oh gosh, I want to say it was like 42. | 01:26:17 | |
| 1000. | 01:26:19 | |
| Something. | 01:26:20 | |
| That is remaining we we actually through. | 01:26:22 | |
| The application process and then the work of the advisory. | 01:26:25 | |
| Committee and then the Executive Committee, we've allocated over $1.9 million of the 2 million. | 01:26:30 | |
| To projects. | 01:26:35 | |
| I can get your figures on the number of housing units over all that would be. | 01:26:37 | |
| Coming of the. | 01:26:41 | |
| The proposals. | 01:26:42 | |
| But they're they're very positive. | 01:26:44 | |
| Projects for Dodge County. | 01:26:46 | |
| But we didn't exhaust. | 01:26:49 | |
| Exactly and completely 2 million. So whatever that balances would roll over and then we did plan for a $2,000,000 allocation. | 01:26:50 | |
| So there is $2,000,000 set aside for next year. | 01:26:58 | |
| And then? | 01:27:02 | |
| Where department requests included or rejected in the budget, I've kind of gone through. | 01:27:04 | |
| Thread already so. | 01:27:09 | |
| That was that were the that were. | 01:27:10 | |
| Those were the questions. | 01:27:13 | |
| Any follow up or? | 01:27:15 | |
| Something that. | 01:27:17 | |
| Missed that you? | 01:27:19 | |
| Wanted to know about and maybe you called or sent an e-mail and it hasn't been addressed. | 01:27:21 | |
| We can try to take care of that tonight. | 01:27:26 | |
| Supervisor Sigmund. | 01:27:31 | |
| Thank you. Could you just explain? I think I read about some leftover. | 01:27:33 | |
| Sales tax from 2024 is that. | 01:27:37 | |
| In there what? | 01:27:41 | |
| Could you just explain how that all? | 01:27:42 | |
| Is work work so? | 01:27:44 | |
| Thank you. So that I'm thinking that you're looking at the letter. | 01:27:45 | |
| Rate, Rate that front letter. | 01:27:50 | |
| Yep, so. | 01:27:52 | |
| That. | 01:27:54 | |
| That sales tax fund balance that. | 01:27:56 | |
| I believe should be 2025. | 01:27:58 | |
| And that's just an error on my part. | 01:28:01 | |
| I have it crossed out on here. | 01:28:04 | |
| So what page? | 01:28:06 | |
| I'm looking at page five of the budget document. | 01:28:07 | |
| And it's right in the first paragraph. | 01:28:12 | |
| 2nd to last complete line. | 01:28:15 | |
| And yes, it says the remaining in the 20. | 01:28:17 | |
| For debt payments? | 01:28:20 | |
| And the sentence of the 6.4 million remaining. | 01:28:22 | |
| In the 2024 sales tax fund balance, that's 2020. | 01:28:26 | |
| So thank you. | 01:28:29 | |
| So just to be clear. | 01:28:33 | |
| Just to be clear, it's. | 01:28:36 | |
| What's remaining in 2025 is a 3.9. | 01:28:38 | |
| Yes, that's what we're rejecting. | 01:28:42 | |
| Correct. | 01:28:45 | |
| Thank you. | 01:28:46 | |
| So when we're talking about the 6.457, I think that was. | 01:28:47 | |
| That was to date remaining. | 01:28:51 | |
| Oh, with an expectation, right, that we're going to apply? | 01:28:53 | |
| Additional fund balance, so will be two 2 million at the end. | 01:28:57 | |
| Yes. | 01:29:00 | |
| Thank you. | 01:29:01 | |
| 2.3. | 01:29:02 | |
| Supervisor Teal. | 01:29:04 | |
| Keel. | 01:29:08 | |
| I think a summary. | 01:29:11 | |
| I haven't asked for this. | 01:29:13 | |
| Before but. | 01:29:14 | |
| I think. | 01:29:16 | |
| A summary where you show maybe? | 01:29:18 | |
| Sales tax. | 01:29:21 | |
| Applied in the budget? Something that brings it all together, yes. | 01:29:23 | |
| I can see it. | 01:29:27 | |
| Say on. | 01:29:29 | |
| Pages 12. | 01:29:32 | |
| 13 where you show total revenues, but maybe. | 01:29:34 | |
| Something that shows projects. | 01:29:38 | |
| And what it has applied to. | 01:29:40 | |
| Thank you. Yeah. | 01:29:42 | |
| Both for. | 01:29:44 | |
| Safe for the current year. | 01:29:45 | |
| And for next year? | 01:29:47 | |
| And how many roads? | 01:29:48 | |
| Miles, this is. | 01:29:50 | |
| Anticipated at this point. | 01:29:52 | |
| To cover. | 01:29:55 | |
| I think that would be good and maybe. | 01:29:57 | |
| When you look at highways. | 01:30:00 | |
| Look at some history and see. | 01:30:03 | |
| What have we done for a few years and how did we fund it and how many roads have we done? | 01:30:06 | |
| Give us some history. | 01:30:13 | |
| Of how did you fund it? Sales tax? ARPA. | 01:30:16 | |
| Levy grants. | 01:30:20 | |
| You know, funding local. | 01:30:22 | |
| Chip money. | 01:30:25 | |
| Local Rd. assistance funds, whatever it was, but how? | 01:30:27 | |
| Have we? | 01:30:31 | |
| Progressed over the last. | 01:30:32 | |
| Five years. | 01:30:34 | |
| 10 years, whatever. | 01:30:36 | |
| Is feasible. | 01:30:38 | |
| Might give you. | 01:30:40 | |
| A history to say. | 01:30:42 | |
| Here's what we've done in. | 01:30:44 | |
| We did. | 01:30:46 | |
| 5 miles for. | 01:30:47 | |
| 10 million. | 01:30:50 | |
| Or 5 million and now that 5 miles is going to be 10 million. | 01:30:51 | |
| It just to show the progression. | 01:30:57 | |
| Yeah. Thank you. | 01:30:59 | |
| We can do that and the good news is when we approach the budget this year. | 01:31:02 | |
| We approached it and provided you with. | 01:31:06 | |
| Substantial completion, but not completion. | 01:31:09 | |
| So that we could. | 01:31:12 | |
| Make improvement. So we could probably still add something to this budget for the final. | 01:31:13 | |
| But I appreciate it. | 01:31:17 | |
| Thank you. | 01:31:18 | |
| Go ahead. | 01:31:20 | |
| That's it, That's it. | 01:31:21 | |
| Well, Mr. Chair, if that's it, I do not have. | 01:31:24 | |
| Other. | 01:31:26 | |
| Highlights to. | 01:31:28 | |
| To bring up at this time. | 01:31:29 | |
| I'm looking back at department directors. | 01:31:31 | |
| See if anybody's brains. | 01:31:34 | |
| Gears are turning. They want to share something new. | 01:31:36 | |
| I think anymore specific questions, Supervisor Keel. | 01:31:38 | |
| Her revenue, I just wanted to ask. | 01:31:44 | |
| When you said 500,000 was added to Wimker. | 01:31:48 | |
| To make it what? | 01:31:53 | |
| So 800,000. | 01:31:55 | |
| Ah OK. I can't answer that right now because at one point I believe. | 01:31:58 | |
| 300,000 in previous budget and she's getting out of that one plugged in you're going to. | 01:32:02 | |
| So so last year budgeted. | 01:32:11 | |
| 1.3 So we added or sorry, this year we budgeted 1.3 but we added 500 to be 1.8. | 01:32:14 | |
| We this year we budgeted 500 and now next year it's 1.8. | 01:32:21 | |
| Sorry. | 01:32:26 | |
| 500 last year, 1.8 this year. | 01:32:27 | |
| Yeah, correct. | 01:32:35 | |
| What? What was the? | 01:32:38 | |
| Well, and that's probably also how I. | 01:32:40 | |
| Wrote it and said it. So we can clarify that. So what was submitted by the department's what what was submitted originally by the | 01:32:42 | |
| department was the 1.3. We changed it to 1.8. So as an additional 500,000. So it's the yes, it was the, it was the adding in. | 01:32:50 | |
| Anticipated revenues. | 01:32:58 | |
| That we have. | 01:33:00 | |
| Deliberately not added in in the past. | 01:33:01 | |
| So that we. | 01:33:03 | |
| And if it doesn't show up? | 01:33:05 | |
| We're not out 1.8 million. | 01:33:07 | |
| In terms of revenues, we're out. | 01:33:09 | |
| Less than that, last year we only budgeted 500,000. | 01:33:11 | |
| So if we got. | 01:33:14 | |
| 500,000 Great if we got more win. | 01:33:16 | |
| And if we got less, we were only out 500,000. | 01:33:19 | |
| I guess what's the point of mentioning it, right? | 01:33:22 | |
| Yes, ma'am. | 01:33:26 | |
| Which is also the three-year average. | 01:33:29 | |
| We based it on a historical average. | 01:33:31 | |
| OK. Any other specific questions? | 01:33:36 | |
| All right, Kathy. Supervisor Houchin. | 01:33:44 | |
| Thank you. | 01:33:46 | |
| There's some things as I go through the budget. | 01:33:47 | |
| I have a problem. | 01:33:49 | |
| With borrowing money. | 01:33:51 | |
| For roads at the same time, we're giving away $2,000,000 in grants. | 01:33:54 | |
| To me that doesn't make sense if we don't have the money to give and we've only done it for one year. | 01:33:59 | |
| Given those grants. | 01:34:04 | |
| Maybe we take a little break, see how the. | 01:34:06 | |
| How the investment? | 01:34:09 | |
| Worked. | 01:34:10 | |
| Do we even have benchmarks on those investments? | 01:34:11 | |
| Are there benchmarks? | 01:34:15 | |
| So yes, I, I will say yes, we have built into our contracts. | 01:34:16 | |
| Timelines and requirements. | 01:34:22 | |
| So. | 01:34:23 | |
| When these entities apply, they give us. | 01:34:24 | |
| A projection of. | 01:34:27 | |
| How long they think their their project is going to take and what is going to yield? | 01:34:28 | |
| And we want we hold them to a specific timeline. I believe there may be additional details. I'm looking toward corporation counsel | 01:34:32 | |
| because she's been. | 01:34:35 | |
| An integral part of drafting those. | 01:34:39 | |
| But we told them to it. And if they don't? | 01:34:42 | |
| Come in within the time frame to get reimbursed because they can show us the deliverable. | 01:34:45 | |
| Than those dollars don't get. | 01:34:51 | |
| Distributed. | 01:34:52 | |
| But at the same time, some of our tips are. | 01:34:55 | |
| And they might not payout. | 01:34:59 | |
| We might not see the. | 01:35:01 | |
| The value of that for. | 01:35:03 | |
| 5-10 years. | 01:35:05 | |
| Not yeah. | 01:35:07 | |
| Not in property tax, correct? | 01:35:08 | |
| And so I think. | 01:35:10 | |
| To borrow money when we're getting. | 01:35:14 | |
| I know you, I know it. It always feels good to be a funny away. | 01:35:17 | |
| If we don't have it, we. | 01:35:26 | |
| I see. | 01:35:30 | |
| What you're saying? | 01:35:30 | |
| Our to. | 01:35:38 | |
| Thank you. | 01:35:42 | |
| One thing that I will if I can. | 01:35:43 | |
| Go ahead. | 01:35:46 | |
| Just a couple thoughts because I appreciate Kathy to comment. We've talked about this one already a little bit. | 01:35:47 | |
| And. | 01:35:53 | |
| Yes. | 01:35:53 | |
| With with tax increment financing districts, we're not going to see. | 01:35:54 | |
| That return in property tax value. | 01:35:58 | |
| A base value increase for. | 01:36:01 | |
| Depends on which district, right? But the potential is always 20 or 27 years. That's the the time frame depending on which type of | 01:36:04 | |
| tax increment district it is. | 01:36:09 | |
| But if we get the development in that district. | 01:36:13 | |
| It yields a lot of other fruit. | 01:36:17 | |
| For us. | 01:36:19 | |
| So. | 01:36:20 | |
| The benefit of the people moving in and investing, whether they be people that end up contributing to bodies like this in their. | 01:36:21 | |
| Locale have kids that are going to school. | 01:36:28 | |
| That gets more money from the state for our school districts, so or. | 01:36:31 | |
| From us. From us too, I guess. | 01:36:35 | |
| As residents. But you're growing. You're growing the base of. | 01:36:37 | |
| I guess assets and resources. | 01:36:42 | |
| Even though you're not seeing the specific. | 01:36:44 | |
| Revenue set of property tax over that same time period, it's difficult to measure. | 01:36:47 | |
| That's why property tax is what we measure. | 01:36:53 | |
| But there are other, there are other value adds, excuse me, to the community or to the county as a whole of having it. | 01:36:55 | |
| So I would just want to share that. | 01:37:01 | |
| That thought before. | 01:37:04 | |
| Yeah, before the the opportunity. | 01:37:06 | |
| Goes away. | 01:37:09 | |
| So thank you. | 01:37:10 | |
| Supervisor. | 01:37:10 | |
| I was going to say something similar. This is not giving. | 01:37:12 | |
| This is not going to Saint Vinnie's, this is an investment in our community. | 01:37:15 | |
| And I know one of our supervisors just talked about our stagnating population. | 01:37:20 | |
| You know. | 01:37:24 | |
| I grew up here. | 01:37:25 | |
| And. | 01:37:26 | |
| We are. | 01:37:27 | |
| Within 2000. | 01:37:27 | |
| People City Beaver Dam. | 01:37:29 | |
| Since I. | 01:37:31 | |
| Came here in grade school. | 01:37:32 | |
| So. | 01:37:33 | |
| Yeah, it's stagnated. So when you invest in housing. | 01:37:35 | |
| You attract. | 01:37:39 | |
| Pill from out. | 01:37:41 | |
| I don't know where we're talking about cutting 10% of the workforce. Clearview's got a terrific shortage. | 01:37:43 | |
| Of workers and we're putting in a multi $1,000,000 project. | 01:37:48 | |
| Maybe not horrific, but we have a shortage. | 01:37:52 | |
| And we're putting this multi. | 01:37:54 | |
| $1,000,000 expansion and if we don't even have people right. | 01:37:56 | |
| It's we've got to fill it. | 01:37:59 | |
| Right. And if we can't fill it with staff, then we can't fill it with patients. So like cutting Clearview? | 01:38:02 | |
| Would not be a great idea. | 01:38:07 | |
| But similarly, not investing in the community looks good on paper. | 01:38:09 | |
| But. | 01:38:15 | |
| Wouldn't it be amazing? | 01:38:16 | |
| If when the younger people here are older and they look back and go wow, look at how everything is going so well and businesses | 01:38:18 | |
| are thriving and our population is up. | 01:38:23 | |
| And we did that because we invested in the community. | 01:38:28 | |
| So it's not just a gift. | 01:38:32 | |
| And there's also a huge housing shortage. So if these are housing developments. | 01:38:35 | |
| That's critical. | 01:38:40 | |
| You don't have enough housing. How are we going to grow? | 01:38:41 | |
| The community. | 01:38:44 | |
| Any other comments? | 01:38:50 | |
| I have one more, Mr. Chair, if I could. | 01:38:54 | |
| Just. | 01:38:56 | |
| Wanted to mention. | 01:38:58 | |
| For those of you and. | 01:38:59 | |
| I would appreciate and understand and expect that. | 01:39:01 | |
| Nearly everyone or everyone. | 01:39:04 | |
| Looking hard at what we are doing in terms of operations and how that relates to what we might be. | 01:39:06 | |
| Asking our residents to pay in some other form of. | 01:39:12 | |
| Of added property tax in coming years. | 01:39:15 | |
| We are one thing. | 01:39:20 | |
| That will be significant overtime. | 01:39:22 | |
| We are coaching all of our departments. | 01:39:25 | |
| So that when we are talking about all of the capital, things were not. | 01:39:28 | |
| Debating tonight or discussing tonight? | 01:39:32 | |
| But the the vehicles or. | 01:39:34 | |
| New lighting. | 01:39:37 | |
| In a facility. | 01:39:39 | |
| Air conditioner on top of the building, whatever those things might be. | 01:39:41 | |
| As we. | 01:39:45 | |
| Build those out. | 01:39:46 | |
| We are coaching and requiring proof. | 01:39:48 | |
| Of budgeting for the long term replacement of that item. | 01:39:51 | |
| In the future. | 01:39:55 | |
| So. | 01:39:56 | |
| Understanding just a point about conservative. | 01:39:58 | |
| Budgeting. | 01:40:01 | |
| We're not asked. People aren't coming and asking for something now and then not planning for how they're going to pay for it | 01:40:02 | |
| later. | 01:40:05 | |
| When they have to come ask again. | 01:40:09 | |
| We're we're looking for and requiring folks to set aside dollars and. | 01:40:11 | |
| To the extent. | 01:40:17 | |
| A lot of it this year didn't didn't show up because we still said no to the requests. | 01:40:18 | |
| But in the future. | 01:40:22 | |
| There's. | 01:40:23 | |
| There's other. | 01:40:25 | |
| Value adds that we're working on trying to reduce. | 01:40:26 | |
| Our our overhead cost or at least our. | 01:40:30 | |
| Long term. | 01:40:33 | |
| Surprise impact planning for the future with operations, maintenance and replacement. | 01:40:34 | |
| Thank you. | 01:40:41 | |
| And that is all that I have, Mr. Chair, so. | 01:40:42 | |
| OK. | 01:40:45 | |
| What do we have on the desk tonight? | 01:40:49 | |
| On your desks you have an e-mail. | 01:40:52 | |
| From the county administrator with the questions and you also have an outline of the meetings and the deadlines for budget | 01:40:55 | |
| amendments. | 01:41:00 | |
| Provided by my office as a reminder for you. | 01:41:05 | |
| Thank you. | 01:41:09 | |
| Supervisor Johnson. | 01:41:12 | |
| OK, I make a motion to adjourn to our the next meeting this Thursday, October 30th at 6:00 PM. | 01:41:14 | |
| I have a second by Supervisor Miller. | 01:41:21 | |
| All in favor signify by aye. | 01:41:23 | |
| Opposed. That is carried. | 01:41:26 |